(5 L - 0 M - 0 D) Law of transitive relation holds? Lucario vs Machamp

[Jasonsith]

This is Machamp vs Lucario, 7-A versions; none had access to TMS/HMS or mega evolution.

Inspired by the two matches that Lucario > Garou and Garou > Machamp


Lucario - 5 - GyroNutz, GlaceonGamez471, Ionliosite, Starter Pack, The real cal howard

Machamp - 0

Ditto - 0

 

[GyroNutz]

Probably. Machamp relies on stone edge to attack from afar, which Lucario greatly resists, whereas Lucario has a much more varied ranged movepool which Machamp literally cannot avoid due to homing attacks and Machamp's own no-guard ability, several reliable stat amps (Machamp has bulk up but they aren't as effective as Lucario's agility, swords dance etc) and sealing as a last resort. If Machamp gets in CQC range, no-guard screws over Lucario's mind reading and 2x boosted dynamic punches screw over Lucario in general, but Lucario probably will have enough stat amps by that point to finish Machamp off.

Although I feel like Machamp is more of a challenge to Lucario than Garou was, Lucario still wins more times than not.

 

[GlaceonGamez471]

Lucario FRA

 

[Jasonsith]

Counted

 

[Ionliosite]

Lucario FRA

 

[Jasonsith]

Counting

And... Machamp fares better against Lucario than Garou does... Should a redux be made...

 

[GyroNutz]

Nah, unlike Garou, Machamp is able to take advantage of Lucario's weakness.

 

[Starter_Pack]

Lucario FRA.

 

[Jasonsith]

Counted

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

Luke FRA

 

[Jasonsith]

Poor Machamp

2 to go