2-B / 2-A Revision?

[Fllflourine]

It's come to my attention that out of the 2-A profiles that I have viewed so far, there are only two 2-As that can destroy only a finite number, at least to my knowledge: Mobster Kingpi and Omega Flowey.

Because of this, I propose changing the requirement for 2-B from "1001 to 10^500" to "Any finite number of Universal Continuums greater than 1000" and regular 2-A to simply "Infinite Universal Continuums".

 

[Promestein]

2-B ends where it does for a reason, which is because 10^500 space-time continuums is the amount theorized to exist in our multiverse. I believe this has been brought up before.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

i support this completely

the 10^500 is an arbitrary number for number of 11-D configurations a universe can have (that number can be different if we set certain parameters differently)

and there is no limit to the number of universes which have the same configuration

the configuration apparently sets the amount of dark energy "gas" there can be in a universe per its given volume

so yeah the 10^500 is completely arbitrary

changin 2-B upper limit to any finite number makes more sense

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

I'd tend to agree.

So little characters have finite 2-A, it doesn't seem necessary to me. Especially since this seems to sometimes causes confusion, such as having Flowey fight other 2-As.

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

As Promestein said it's been brought up before and denied, as such I don't think it's a good idea to continue this discussion.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

As Promestein said it's been brought up before and denied, as such I don't think it's a good idea to continue this discussion.

but were the points that i have brought up now brought up before?

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Not from what I can see no, not nearly as many. Interestingly Antvasima considered it when there was a possibility of confusion between the tiers. In which case I suppose, considering mismatches have been rampant, he may take this into consideration?

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

I was thinking that the finite 2-A characters should've been rated as Low 2-A or High 2-B from the get go. Really no reason to lump them in with characters who can affect infinite timelines.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

well i think it is only logical to make a slight alteration to the 2-B range as of now

 

[Fllflourine]

@TMR Do you have a link to it (the previous thread anyway) or is it in the Discussion Rules?

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

Here, Lord Kavpeny and Antvasima disagree with the notion of its alteration.

I think there's a rule that you're not supposed to question the tiering system as well, but there are exceptions (exceptions being staff members, that is).

 

[Fllflourine]

So if it is already covered then, I guess this thread could be closed?

 

[TheMightyRegulator]

I think that's best, yes.