1-A question

[Orioreeem]

What kind of context would you need to qualify for 1-A? Would viewing higher spatial dimensions as fiction be enough?

 

[Arceus0x]

What kind of context would you need to qualify for 1-A? Would viewing higher spatial dimensions as fiction be enough?

depending on the context and how well it fits. Viewing the entire concept of dimensions, no matter how many, as fiction would definitely grant you 1-A. Just viewing a dimension (let's say 6th) would just make you 7d

 

[Vietthai96]

What kind of context would you need to qualify for 1-A? Would viewing higher spatial dimensions as fiction be enough?

No, viewing something as fiction is 1 layer of trancendental. 1-A require you to totally transcend and beyond dimension itself, even infinitely stacking layer upon layer of higher dimension on each others still incapable of reaching

 

[Arceus0x]

No, viewing something as fiction is 1 layer of trancendental. 1-A require you to totally transcend and beyond dimension itself, even infinitely stacking layer upon layer of higher dimension on each others still incapable of reaching

That's if you see a certain dimension as fiction. If you see the concept of dimensions as a whole as fiction it would be 1-A.
Like you aren't viewing the 1.3e+567th dimension as fiction, you are viewing all dimensions as a whole as fiction. That would be indeed 1-A

 

[Funnimane]

Viewing the entire concept of dimensions, no matter how many, as fiction would definitely grant you 1-A.

real world is 1-A

 

[Arceus0x]

real world is 1-A

Lmao

 

[Arceus0x]

Anyways it's obvious that viewing sth as fiction is meant to be taken how book characters are fiction to us, just a thought in our vast minds

 

[Ryuhei246]

Konteks seperti apa yang Anda perlukan untuk memenuhi syarat untuk 1-A? Apakah melihat dimensi spasial yang lebih tinggi sebagai fiksi sudah cukup?

to get criteria 1A requires a full transcend of all extensions of a dimension, which means that you want to accumulate as many as any infinite higher dimension it will never cover the realm of 1A

 

[Kowalski]

What kind of context would you need to qualify for 1-A? Would viewing higher spatial dimensions as fiction be enough?

Conceptually transcends nature of "dimension" and being superior to every possible stacking of those dimensions. In short word, 1-A character transcends the concept of dimension as a whole.