This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I think the existing standards pretty clearly don't allow for this to be 2-A, otherwise the distinction between 2-C, 2-B, and 2-A which is based on the amount of universes would become meaningless.
Yes, but the space that contains them simply being "infinite" isn't 2-A. It would need to either contain an infinite amount of universes or there would need to be a direct indication that it could contain an infinite amount. There isn't any and the OP isn't even alleging that there is, aside...
Superimposing text on a scan isn't merely a different translation. You should either be posting the raws and providing a translation, or posting the official English version of the scan. Ovens is right to point out that there is a very big issue passing off a scan with a dubious translation...
We have specific tiers based on the amount of universes. Infinite size is just Low 2-C. Containing 2-1000 universes is 2-C, anything finite above 1000 is 2-B and infinite universes 2-A.
So I don't see how we would reach the conclusion of 2-A based on the phrase word "many". I'm not sure it's...
I will note, crucially, that his argument for 2-A is that the structure is Low 1-C. There isn't any evidence of it containing an infinite amount of universes. The premise of the upgrade is kind of farcical in that regard.
OP is not arguing that it is stated within the verse that the DW contains...
Agreed on Dimensional Travel and Immersion, there's really just no basis for assuming literally anyone can do what Charlotte can do, and even for Charlotte it should be specified that this is a very specific circumstance. The situation with the painting acting as a wall for Dracula's magic...
Yeah, based on this description I am skeptical that the Root qualifies. Many of these issues overlap with some of the issues with Tier 0, but for different reasons.
@Ultima_Reality Your thoughts?
It was a translation issue. The current immeasurable justification is based on Argosax having "instantaneous movement" but it's literally just teleportation.
Why would this pass when you are freely admitting that the premise of the upgrade is just not true, and what you're actually arguing for is Low 1-C, which has been rejected?
I am fairly resistant to the idea that the phrase "that body of darkness" is sufficient to regard Mundus as being the void itself, given the litany of other descriptions during this fight scene that suggests the opposite, in addition to the inherently unintuitive nature of that idea
I mean, I don't mind tackling both, it's just that it'll likely turn into a debacle. But I can make the case pretty easily. Dante's profile suggests that he has Immeasurable speed from dodging attacks from an Omnipresent Mundus:
Crucially, however, the description of the attacks and the dodging...
That would be better suited to a QnA thread, not a CRT.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/yikes-i-suppose-even-fuji-may-cry-after-looking-at-this-upgrade-crt.168769/
I don't know what you're trying to communicate.
It's not something that can be visualized. Frankly I think the concept is basically incoherent, but some verses do use it. Regardless, that literally is what the tiering requirement is for scaling multiple temporal dimensions.
It's a distinction without a difference. This was discussed at...
So your theory is that Argosax can teleport and has immeasurable speed? Not that the "instant movement" ability refers to teleportation, which we can confirm with the other scan that phonetically calls it "teleporting?"
Frankly I think this is an incredibly strained argument and I don't take it...
I'll add, I am skeptical of that reasoning. Absent more specific information, I wouldn't assume the attacks are anything more than physical manifestations within the realm that are being dodged, rather than some bizarre "dodging" of the realm itself. However, that can be hashed out in a separate...
More importantly, the situation here seems overwhelmingly clear. Not only is teleporting not immeasurable speed, but the upgrade was never approved in the first place.
It was applied in October of 2023, citing this thread which doesn't directly address speed, but in some of the replies they talk about the Argosax feat being brought up in the general thread, which seems to refer to the one you pointed out, so it does seem like it was applied without actually...
For a hyper timeline to be relevant for tiering, it's concept of past/future must be orthogonal from the typical time axis. It can't just be a "bigger" or "separate" time axis, it needs to be directionally distinct, which is a very abstract concept that you can't just stumble your way into by...
I don't think the phrase "quick movement" is incompatible with teleportation, FWIW.
I'm leaning towards agreeing with the thread, but I am open to better evidence of actual infinite or immeasurable speed.
Low 2-C is a single 4-D structure. 2-C is multiple (2 - 1000).
Can you use scans? I don't know what evidence you're referring to.
I don't know what you believe I am admitting to. Was it not already clear that I disagreed?
That was the subject of discussion in his last thread. It was...
Can you be specific?
I already explained this. It's normal to refer to 2-A structures as "infinite" despite them having a 5-D axis which is not infinite, and there's no evidence that the Demon World's 5-D axis is infinite.
Okay, your stance on the matter is noted. I don't share it.
That's not...
Okay, I am more than happy to review them. Where are they?
The Demon World being called infinite "on its own" does not necessarily refer to its 5-D axis. That was one of the main arguments of the earlier thread.
That argument was hashed out extensively in this thread. Also the Darkness was...