• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. Ugarik

    Hey

    Hey
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  2. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    The formula becomes unusable when its derivitive goes negative. It happens a bit earlier
  3. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    No, it uses density of hydrogen at normal pressure and temperature which is okay. My point is that at some point the gap between the final and the initial volume of hybrogen starts shrinking.
  4. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    I'm sorry but this formula simply doesn't work as a remplacement for black hole creation. It calculates work from change of volume. The problem is that initial volume is calculated from mass and density while final one uses schwarzschild radius. The bigger gap between those two the more work it...
  5. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    Nevermind. I figured it out
  6. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    Well yes, this is litteraly what I said. Yeah, I messed that one up I admit E = -V1 ∫V2(K*V^-γ)*dV I don't get this part at all
  7. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    There is probably something wrong with the formula. I left a reply in your blog
  8. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    So in conclusion we need formula for adiobatic compression of hydrogen that takes gravity into account?
  9. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?
  10. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    I agree with Clover about the AP part. Moreover even if the assume that outliers can occur frequently as long as they are of a similar nature it would be very difficult to make up a consistend rule to exclude them from powerscaling
  11. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    Hydrogen H2 is a two atomic gas to its internal energy is: E = 3/2nRT In adiobatic process temperature ratio is T2/T1 = (V1/V2)^(R/C) so T2 = T1*(V1/V2)^(R/C) E = 3/2nR*T1*(V1/V2)^(R/C) From the calc above: V2 = 8πMG/c^2 and V1 = M/ρH2 E = 3/2nR*T1*((M/ρ)/(8πMG/c^2))^(R/C) E =...
  12. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    The formula is correct but I'm not sure if it's reasonable to assume isothermal compression. Adiabatic seems to make much more sense to me
  13. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    Like I said before a valid LS feat in my opinion should be performed continuously. I don't think I have much more to add to this. This is only a mater of how many people agree with me. As it has been pointed out already striking a baseball would output an absolutely huge amount of force. This...
  14. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    About lifting strength. I suggest we add a new rule. Something along the lines "A valid lifting strength feat should be performed for a duration of at least several seconds" Just because a character can launch a football to space or punch a dent in a sheet of metal doesn't mean he can exort...
  15. Ugarik

    I don't think this can be calculated

    I don't think this can be calculated
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  16. Ugarik

    Classroom Of The Elite - Speed calc replacement

    72 m/s can probably work but I would like to hear opinion of other cg members
  17. Ugarik

    Why do we limit compressive strength to pulverisation?

    Nobody knows why
  18. Ugarik

    Classroom Of The Elite - Speed calc replacement

    Okay that makes sense. But is it reaconable to assume 110 degree movement with straight arm? Is it realy the shortest path to block that kick?
  19. Ugarik

    Classroom Of The Elite - Speed calc replacement

    Isn't 60 mph the maximum speed of the kick? It takes time for a leg to accelerate to that spreed. Shouldn't the results be halved?
  20. Ugarik

    Evaluate a thread? It's a powerscaling thread. The calcs have already been accepted

    Evaluate a thread? It's a powerscaling thread. The calcs have already been accepted
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  21. Ugarik

    There is no way to calculate it. A bar wouldn't deform in such way in real world. It would...

    There is no way to calculate it. A bar wouldn't deform in such way in real world. It would always form sharp angles
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  22. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    The hinges act as support points. The fact that the rod is longer doesn't affect the result
  23. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    Positive and negative torques acting on the rod are equal in magnitude as long as the rod is static. So it doesn't mater if we chose those that act in clockwise or counter-clockwise direction.
  24. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    In that case we can define bending moment M as counter-clockwise torque at that point. M = N1*x+N2*(y+z). Force F is not in the equation since it acts in the opposite direction. In statics sum of all forces acting on the rod has to be zero, otherwise it would accelerate in the direction of...
  25. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    Yes. Negative and posive torque components do counteract. In fact they are equal in magnitude and thefore make net-torque zero. But it doesn't mean the rod it not under bending load. It just means that it's not rotating as the result of all those forces. The bending moment calculated from...
  26. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    Okay so in this case we have two forces aplied in the opposite directions y distance appart from each other like in the picture below: Since both F1 and F2 are aplied by a single hand they have to be equal due to Newton's third law. In order to find the bending moment M we have to figure...
  27. Ugarik

    Chainsaw Man LS Upgrade

    How is this an LS feat. Haven't we agreed not to calcute LS from stricking?
  28. Ugarik

    Expanding the References for Common Feats page

    Pretty sure mantle is solid. Also gravitational field g should go down the deeper you go according to Gauss' law.
  29. Ugarik

    This is not about complexity either. I don't find my method any more compicated since it only...

    This is not about complexity either. I don't find my method any more compicated since it only uses different values and take into account the level of fragmentanion. But doing that would require us to revise tens of thousands of profiles and pages and nobody wants to do that.
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  30. Ugarik

    I do have a lot to add about this but I don't really see a point since it's clearly not about...

    I do have a lot to add about this but I don't really see a point since it's clearly not about accuracy.
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  31. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    Yes, unfortunately this formula only works for bending long poles or flat sheets across their entire length. I have absolutely no idea or how to calcute a randomly shaped dent on a flat sheet
  32. Ugarik

    Hasn't it been evaluated already?

    Hasn't it been evaluated already?
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  33. Ugarik

    Shoot. But I don't promise i'll make it

    Shoot. But I don't promise i'll make it
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  34. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    In this context moment of inertia means this. It is used to calculate elastic section modulus. The mass moment of inertia is calculated in a very similar way hence the same name. In fact if we multiply area moment of inertia by density we will get mass moment of inertia where neutral axis turns...
  35. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    This V bending calculator uses the method I've shown above. It assumes rectangular cross section, fully plactic deformation, and 3-point bending (case 3 in the picture above). It also uses ultimate tensile strength instead of yeild strength to get the highest result posible. Yeild strength is...
  36. Ugarik

    Indentation Calcs

    Since the whole thing was never resolved I'm going to explain bending formula. I am not going to cover the math explaining how it works (Although I can do it in case further explanation is required) but I am going to make a quick guide. If the bending deformation is plastic the first thing we...
  37. Ugarik

    Is this thread still relevant? https://vsbattles.com/threads/indentation-calcs.159931/ I'm...

    Is this thread still relevant? https://vsbattles.com/threads/indentation-calcs.159931/ I'm probably the first user to use this method for bending metal and I believe I have a really good understaning on how it actually works
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post
  38. Ugarik

    I accepted the calc but it most graphic editors you can directly measure area of pretty much...

    I accepted the calc but it most graphic editors you can directly measure area of pretty much any arbitrary shape using selection tool
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  39. Ugarik

    Everything else in the second part looks fine

    Everything else in the second part looks fine
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  40. Ugarik

    In this secific case KE is calculated differently. KE = 0.4πρ(R^5-r^5)/t^2 where ρ is density of...

    In this secific case KE is calculated differently. KE = 0.4πρ(R^5-r^5)/t^2 where ρ is density of the planet. R and r are radii of the planet before and after the contraction. I derived this formula with DontTalkTD a while ago.
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
Back
Top