This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yes, they are. Hiding Calculations is pretty clear cut about how it's still inflationary to use really big superhuman values from entirely different scenes for the sake of numbers. I am fine if said timeframes are directly within the calculated feat, but beyond that, no
Oh yeah, on the topic of the Worldmap being unusable as a metric for how fast the Epoch travels, doesn't one of the endings have you just smash it into Lavos directly?
Granted, it doesn't exactly show any frame of reference as to where the Epoch starts, but it should be at least outside the...
I think the only factor that could make this swing is if Tatsumaki counts as a japanese citizen
Even if the answer was yes that'd just result in Makima getting her to kill herself by accident, so it's not really any more a compelling matchup for it
Might be fair, I will note
obviously that runs into the issue of our fragmentation values inherently being ??? but if it's really not even in the loose shape of a sphere, that should be factored in
(Admittedly Incarnation does do space warping stuff but even if you argue that to an extent that would bypass infinity, Kirito is still more than able to one-shot the guy via being 7-B)
Man it's always funny to be veteran of mildly haxed character spams and see new blood react to this sorta thing
Brings me back to the days of Kirito... (Who Gojo absolutely stomps, don't get ideas)
As Agnaa pointed out earlier, the true gap for a one-shot by the metrics listed for 5x is... 1x. Because placement just does allow you to take someone out of a fight with a single hit even in scenarios where it's an MMA fight against two dudes trained about the same way.
The rigid one-shot gap...
I suppose this is a pretty straightforward "calc group members, use more reasonable values" but I am bumping since this is important in a retroactive sense as well, we should probably revise calcs using this sort of stuff
Type 7 immortality isn't really something you "negate", it's just noting that something can't die because it's already dead. Damaging it until it just doesn't function isn't really a special ability (outside of superhuman AP, but)
Durability negation also needs to have said methods properly...
Maybe I'm just speaking for myself but on that high of an end I just check the c and go off that
Either way I doubt there are that many examples that exactly fit into this kind of gap, and if there are, oh well, shouldn't be too hard to just observe and fix offhand
The funniest thing is that's the physically worst example you could pull out due the sheer length of time we argued that the Doomslayer just doesn't have his weapons actually scale to him due to how high end his physicals were in the 2016 game
Anyways I agree with Armorchompy, I just don't...
I'm pretty sure basically all pages go off the m/s or c count, so I don't think this actually would cause any revision. In that case, I'm totally fine with just fixing a minor error on one of our informational pages.
It has umbral properties but I don't believe it's literally darkness (or if it is, the gang interacts with it like it's a normal object given it can be flash frozen and the explosion actually makes a lasting hole rather than having the flash of light just completely cancel out the entire...
Siberian can't cross infinite distance, it's physics manipulation is based on ignoring force, thus making it so the mass of an opponent has no resistance to be pushed apart (and of course causing it to be flat out immune being hit). This wouldn't do anything to infinity because Siberian doesn't...
No human IRL can accelerate from 0 to 230 kilometers per hour on a dime either. That's what makes things much harder to track and perceive, a spontaneous change you might not necessarily be prepared to process.
In fact in general I think that's the underlying problem, we never account for...
It's not crushing it to paste, it's just for fragmenting it. If we're talking about a sheer brute force gap for one-shots (and of course the idea of one-shotting people is wildly variable based on precision, such as focusing the force into a point that can puncture the skull and penetrate the...
(Admittedly I'm now realizing that my proposition just results in the original calc that the new one sourced from and I just blanked on them not actually calculating the volume in favor of my eyes scrolling over it and going "wait .35 seconds seems off")
This time, the practice I'm trying to demolish is entirely my fault. And I don't think I'll be pulling from any specific examples because it's so absurdly widespread.
Still, allow me to clarify my premise. Using the subsonic reaction timeframe for any feat in which characters are "completely...
Reinforces my statement that it wouldn't have been entirely within the timeframe of a single sword slash, but on the other hand that's like, a single second rather than 5 so it'd still be under my estimate
It was done by a sword slash, that doesn't mean the clouds crossed the entire distance within .35 seconds.
If you have an anime clip, I'd be perfectly fine with you just going off of that dunno why you didn't just do that immediately but eh
Indeed, they do understand it.
Then they proceed to make another calc with the same awry methodology.
And they do it again.
And it repeats until I just muster a passing "no" and "this is horrendous". That's what it means when there's a lack of genuine learning to the mistakes, the same dumb...