This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I brought up the Toei Spider-Man thing with you (Ovens) and Zeed back then, so I definitely agree with that and everything else
I always want everyone here to know, regardless of what Takuya scales to, 9-B has always been horrendous downplay smh. This isn't even a bit, put respect on his name
The fact that Persona is outright a canonical spinoff of SMT with several of the same characters, attacks, and concepts appearing time and time again in each entry makes it genuinely baffling when people just go "these are just references with no connections"
Also I agree with the OP
Not a bad idea. I think it makes sense. Although I’m really not sure why LEGO has this sort of verse page rather than just letting there be multiple different pages (ex LEGO Marvel, LEGO DC). It originated from a time where “Nintendo” for a verse page encompassing all of its verses being linked...
Initially, I was shaky on it. But since the MvC collection is putting that game into the collection and art from that game was already in the Official Complete Works, I now believe it is canon to MvC
Side note: I found the Official Game Guide for TCS and its insane, they give a detailed bio to every playable character, variants and all, even including details about the character's status' at the time
I wonder if the underwater pillar or even the giant wall feat (which Jason Courne calculated the AP of) have better results. Not that Class 100 is bad, its a significant step up from the previous LS feat that was calculated
Given that Hal performed one of those feats, we may have an idea of where guys like Superman and Green Lantern scale. Especially helpful info to have given someone like Batman is portrayed as much weaker than them, while also having his lack of “powers” referenced by others
I’m not an expert regarding that, but in that same area where Spider-Man performs the feat, there’s the other Stark Tower letters that should be similar to the “A” in terms of construction. That might help given the state they’re in during this part
-Doc Ock helicopter feat (AP feat. Also an LS feat)
-Spider-Man pulls down Stark Tower's "A" (LS feat)
Potentially huge speed feat, albeit without an official distance to go off of. While travelling to Asgard from Earth through a pathway, there's a brief segment where the characters you play as...
Btw, the 8-C calc just got approved. Not a bad start, but I genuinely don't think 8-C is the cap for the verse given those Ock feats. Of course, I'll see what else I can find
I'd chalk this up more to a case of "the GTAV train is indestructible" and less "Thor's speed is absolutely atrocious". He can still fly faster than the train and react to his own flight speed, has access to lightning, etc.
I don't think using the targeting system on the train is a good basis...
Just came across this calc. An 8-C feat from Spider-Man, nice, nice
Speaking of guys like Spider-Man (as well as Reed and Cap), I'd like to bring up Ock's insane feats here since the aforementioned heroes would scale to these feats:
-First example
-Second example
-Third example
Again, just...
Sorry I keep replying rapidly, but no. We don't have a solid AP value sorted out right now. Same goes for LS. Remember what I brought up in the original thread. We can't just take the first AP and LS feat we calc and slap them onto every page. Not only does scaling clearly exist in the narrative...
Also, what do you mean Mjolnir "can't catch up to a train"? All of the characters who can fly in the original LEGO Marvel game can easily outpace the train, I've done so several times myself while playing
There aren't any characters across all the games that do this. Only Robin was able to survive without his head after Killer Croc removed it with a sewer cap, but thats definitely specific to him only can't just be applied to everybody since we've seen other characters in LEGO games die from...
I disagree strongly. The only abilities shared across the games are Superhuman Physical Characteristics and Construction. Besides that…? Nothing warranting a physiology page. Just not enough
Had a feeling this would be 9-A
Again, just wanna make it clear like I said my list above. High level martial artists and soldiers are considered Expert level. I’m not saying soldiers beat martial artists in most scenarios, stuff like that’s gonna be case by case. I’m only saying that soldiers are gonna have significantly more...
Yes, more training doesn’t always mean you’re more skilled. That’s the point I was making. However, you said soldiers only train for about three weeks while most practitioners train over the course of a year. I was simply bringing up how soldiers don’t train as little as you make them out to...
Like obviously I’m aware that fiction might over exaggerate the capabilities of soldiers from time to time. But I dunno if I would say a guy hitting up the local karate class every week or so is on the same level as soldiers with real life accounts of nearly killing family members on instinct...
I’m aware that not every soldier or military faction is going to be at the same level of skill, and yes, there are cases where maybe a casual practitioner puts in more time. But more times than not, you’re probably gonna favour a soldier’s skills because A) Their training is a lot more difficult...
I’d have to disagree there. The type of fighters I described in Intermediate are meant to have portray those with more skill than your average person, but not a significant degree like highly experienced/proficient martial artists or soldiers. If you think Expert is too high, try to recall that...
That’s an incredibly vague question. Like I said, there are times where General Intelligence and Combat Intelligence have overlapping feats, but if someone with an insanely huge General Intelligence never applies it to their Combat Performance when it comes to those overlapping feats, the answer...
That’s a pretty valid criticism. How about this instead for Extraordinary?
Extraordinary (Combat skill/strategy that manages to eclipse even those with superhuman levels of skill. This degree of proficiency cannot simply result from someone being significantly more skilled than combat geniuses...
Here's what I would suggest. I'm gonna make sort of "comparisons" to the general intelligence ratings highlighted in green excluding anything below the "Below Average" rating since those are fine. I'm gonna link character examples I'm familiar with in areas where it may help. I'm not saying...
Terms like "untrained" and "trained" aren't good examples. There's characters in fiction who canonically have never had a single combat lesson in their life, but are still combat prodigies that can easily wash people ranging from law enforcement to skill-beasts. I know what you're getting at...
Name changes or not, removing skill sections in intelligence sections is certainly not the way to go. Sure, I’m not saying the original purpose of this revision needs to come through. But removing the parts of the pages that go into detail about a character’s fighting level is just a disservice...