This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
That sounds like a good place to start.
So with that, we have the radius a gas cloud will reach in a certain amount of time.
I'm thinking of something sort of like alternating those formulas, in lieu of a proper continuous solution including both. Taking a certain resolution (say, 0.01...
Okay, to make this as simple as I can.
Does the field of physics have any way at all to simulate what a cloud of gas would look like after 1 million years due to the effects of gravity?
If not, then I guess we just can't do it. But I am 99.9999% certain that we can.
We wouldn't be looking for the GPE, we'd be looking for the effect gravity contributes.
We'd essentially be iteratively checking solutions, scaling up and down the compression applied, while keeping the gravitational portion functioning as we know it should, until we end up with a 1 second...
How about a one second timeframe, with the force applied by the character being constant (but the gravity, accordingly, evolving exponentially)?
I'd think that one second would be way too quick for gravity to be the full story.
I believe, and believe that a section of the FAQ explains, that we do treat such structures as being above baseline.
Our only options, in cases where fiction does this, is either to assume that the infinite structure said to be stronger, is stronger than other baseline infinite structures in...
I intend it to be similar to now, but instead of having the calculations under collapsibles, directly link to those calcs on separate pages. I also intend to remove the headers for each individual calc on the main page, to really force people to link the sub-pages rather than the section on the...
I'm not actually too fussed if we don't revise other creation feats as well.
If we're going by the creation = destruction route, that's just impossible for black holes, so we need another way to estimate things. I think it's fine if that ends up being lower.
Revising other creation feats in a...
I'm kinda torn on that. It seems like a lotta work, and I'm not sure if invested members who know a good amount about our standards do actually neglect the Knowledgeable Members List.
But still, it's something that can be done gradually, and by any user, so I don't mind it too much either.
I hope this album gets the idea across.
Using the dedicated search page, the first results are those with the search term in the page title. After that, are results with the search term in the subpage title. And after that, are results with the term in the page's text.
From looking at other...
I think it's fine, since the start would always be the same (i.e. "References for Common Feats"), we can essentially ignore everything after the #.
In that search bar, you won't see sub-pages pop up when searching for the sub-page name, you'll only see them if you search for the main page...
As I said, I think that would be easily manageable through bots, as it'd be a consistent pattern that only needs one character to be changed.
I just realised I could check this functionality on other wikis; it seems like searching for a page which has subpages functions like this.
It is highly relevant!!!!
Why do you now say that the top layer to an infinitely large hierarchy is uncountably infinite? Our old page explicitly rejected that.
Well actually, if the hierarchy involves all possible permutations of an infinitely large hierarchy, it'd be uncountably infinite...
I'll edit your draft accordingly.
I don't think "levels of infinity" implies that in context, but I also don't think it's the best wording.
As discussed off-site, I think "Higher-dimensional spaces that are uncountably infinitely superior" is a solid place to land at. Still, I won't apply...
This is the funniest outcome. Please find more of these.
This feels like it shouldn't be the answer, since Type 2 BDE and QS are separate things (hence why the former, by default, gets Low 1-A, while the latter gets 1-A).
I agree with this change. We need an ability for being able to meaningfully interact with elemental intangibility, and the same ability you get for interacting with other kinds of intangibility is the best fit.
idk what you mean by "company's name", Tllm was trying to appeal through the "bigger companies" exception.
fwiw, I think something like this could be a way people read that, but probably isn't what was intended.
Tllm's most interesting point, when bringing this up to me on Discord, was that Happy Tree Friends, another show of theirs, aired on TV.
But so far I haven't been told any further details.
Two staff agreed with one part of the OP, and those staff haven't commented in ages, and a large amount of staff have commented since disagreeing with that part too.
High 3-A is a special case since it's still technically an amount of joules. 1m x 1m x infinite m would be High 3-A, but 1m x...
Well, to give a quick summary....
There's generally a few camps of regeneration mechanisms in fiction:
Regeneration to point of acquisition. Only works if a character was circumcised after becoming a vampire.
Regeneration to personal mental ideal. Could work, depending on whether the character...
This attitude, of thinking people let anti-feats slide for verses they like, is exactly the issue.
I'm not Deagon ofc, but I'd say I care more about anti-feats for verses I like, since I'm more invested in them getting indexed properly. I make writeups like this and this and this out of love.
Didn't expect that to be controversial, even he agreed with it xd
All evaluating staff for these high-tier things land within a certain range of not being completely insane. Out of the ~15 regular evaluating staff for high tiers we've had over the last ~7 years, I think he's in the 20%...
It doesn't get colder as a byproduct, the heat just, at one point, becomes unable to be emitted, and is just considered a part of the mass/energy of the black hole, contributing to its size.
The temperature would vary, but at some point, I worry about this being an isolated demand for rigor...
That doesn't tell you anything about the matter used to form it. An extremely hot piece of mass going into a black hole wouldn't make the temperature at its event horizon warmer. If anything, it'd make it colder (as it'd add more to its mass, and larger black holes are "colder").
The basis for...
I reckon I may as well post updates as I go through these. Only covering one page since that's all I have the time for right now.
Tiering System Changes
Low 2-C now has this in its definition, "That is to say, they can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures...
Refer to the message I sent immediately after the last time you asked this, just yesterday:
Especially since, as far as I can tell, only two people so far (Everything12, Deagonx) have actually read those massive, vitally-important pages. I don't think we'd typically accept significant rewording...