This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
This is more of a sandbox deletion, but I want this (https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:DemiiPowa/papercut) to be deleted from my sandbox completely and its history.
I did not add it, nor did I request it.
According to the scans, Amelia's world didn't "stop", it outright shows that it was collapsing in on itself (there's more scans in earlier chapters for more context, but we already know the entire reason this was happening was because the entire cosmological structure of her world was unstable)...
According to those guidelines, its fine.
Also the actual site its officially published on (at the time of me typing this comment) states it has 155,000+ views. The standards don't really say a hard number for views, but I figured id just bring that up becase that information just isnt true.
Its not up in the air, and even if that was the case, it still tore the space of hundreds of infinite spaces (it wasnt a singular tear because garnet did not say "a tear"), which qualifies for high 3-A.
At this point, we're just ignoring the feats and trying to apply headcanon where it doesnt exist
Moreover, Its a very ignorant view to dispute evidence simply because of moderator status.
For example, If a character is shown to control water, but a staff says thats fire manipulation, it should not get passed simply because they have a higher status when they've been proven incorrect. (This...
Moreover, you cannot invalidate the potency of an attack that is tearing apart these spaces, to do so would be ignoring the feat completely which is headcanon. Since we have confirmation it is causing physical damage.
To my knowledge, I'm not sure, since every view of homeworld we have, theres really nothing else in frame to compare it to. I don't think it can be calced in any meaningful way which is why we used the baseline
That would be true if Garnet stated "a tear" (singular), instead she said "tear the fabric of his mind". The definition of tear is to "pull or rip (something) apart or to pieces with force." This is different since it means multiple pieces instead of a singular rip in said fabric, unlike what...
Yes, the pocket dimension and the mind are one and the same based on the scans I provided. As for the fabric statement, I was following the dictionary definition of "tear" which was to rip something into pieces, therefore I made the statement I did.
Because the corruption is tearing apart several infinite spaces, these points have already been reiterated, Bill Cipher isn't the exception, we tier hax on site we always have, but I can't find find every single instance on the site when it has over thousands of pages.
Their ability is affected...
So why disagree if you are aware that we tier hax abilities, you're intentionally disagreeing based on personal opinions, which you shouldnt be doing according to the site.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Discussion_Rules
Two staff voted yes, one agreed to tier 5 upgrades while being neutral on High 3-A.
The other staff disagreed with high 3-A Purely on the notion that we dont tier hax (which is not only a lie, but is spreading false information), therefore it wouldn't matter anyways since most supporters agree...
That one staff member is in the minority while most people agree that it makes sense. Are we going to overturn an entire set of votes because one staff member is on the fence about it, meanwhile another one at least agrees with one of the ratings?
Not to mention their argument has already been...
Considering this CRT has been ongoing for approximately 2 weeks, and no more votes/activity has been cast for over 48 hours, the concluding stats should be applied based on the talleys collected.
• Likely 5-C (Caused the destruction of Homeworld, just by emerging)
• High 3-A with Corruption...