This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Because the beastheads is for devouring humans. This isn't evidence of demons having broad resistances to anything the Beastheads do. This was already covered in the first thread. I've already explained why this reasoning is flawed.
No. I'm not creating some massive unreadable thread just to...
There's not an indication that the Beastheads can do this, the phrase "bound your fate" isn't necessarily magical. Further, the beastheads are a device for converting humans into magical energy and replenishing demons. They are a tool for demons to use. They aren't a competitor.
I'm iffy on this. The evidence for the "Heavens" referring to the entirety of space is not terrible, but it is not great. The context is so limited that all we can really say is that it is something beyond Earth in space. For instance, if there were a scan that added more context and clarified...
A concession is defined as "admitting that the other person as right." I do not think you are right, rather, this thread is simply not about that subject. Do not misrepresent my position in this way.
Aside from that, I am going to be removing my comments and other earlier comments squabbling...
I don't see how Crimson Chin scales to the TV Show Pumpkinator. All he really does is hit the Pumpkinator, he never significantly damages it. The planet explosion resulted in Pumpkinator breaking down into the four individual Jack-o-Bots which Crimson Chin never accomplishes. The only reason...
Because there's not sufficient evidence of it. It's also moot, even if we did assume this refers to Fate Manipulation, there's no evidence of Demons being resistant to it.
I can't say that I agree based on these scans, but the OP didn't do a great job communicating this.
I've combed over the information in Azur Lane about shipgirls and wisdom cubes, and it seems more that wisdom cubes are energy sources that contain data for the shipgirls that acts as a kind of...
It's sufficient to point out that there are other explanations than what is being shown. We don't just assume that the proposed interpretation is correct by default without evidence and then demand that anyone opposing it must provide evidence for their interpretation.
Elixir, it is literally in the scan. "Both of us survived, albeit as primitive protoplasmic entities." It's in the same text bubble.
This is not what the scan seems to say. If he would've quickly dissipated into the immaterial without his strong will, that would suggest he was never immaterial...
Protoplasm isn't essence.
If Mogul says "Without my strong will and multiple power rings, I would've dissipated into the immaterial," that would seem to suggest he did have a physical form.
This is a shit ton of scans, but none of them say the chaos emerald was "fused to his soul essence." I...
Many of the resistances on the Demon Physiology page are by virtue of the negative effects the Demon World has on humans, where the fact that demons are unaffected by it is purported to be a resistance. However, not all of these are logical.
The majority of this comes from Beastheads, which...
This is silly. Threads can't be applied until 48 hours regardless. There's nothing wrong with saying "as written, this justification is clearly insufficient. I agree with its removal unless a sufficient justification can be provided to replace it" which is essentially what those who voted said...
The justifications are supposed to have the full context. I'm not opposed to hearing an explanation with better scans that might replace (and sufficiently justify) the ability, but as is I also am going to agree with the removal. If nothing else, supporters can make another thread down the line...
Of course, but you wanting to ask them questions doesn't mean that I am not free to close the thread, which was universally rejected.
Big difference between being 0-8 and being 5-8, and big difference between closing a thread after two days and two weeks.
I am currently informing you that I...
They are both constantly inundated with questions, the point was to simplify the discussion in such a way that they could clear up any remaining ambiguity that you were holding on to in one fell swoop. If you wanted certain questions added, you should have specified that beforehand.
Does...
What would have Abstract Existence due to this? If I am understanding this correctly, they just use the abstract information in humanity's collective consciousness as a blueprint to create things. However, the physical instances created by the cube wouldn't have AE-2 nor would they be thought of...
The people that wrote the standards said the argument doesn't qualify, and they explained pretty well why they don't. Anything they didn't already say is covered sufficiently by the FAQ. The whole point of laying out the argument the way that I did and getting your agreement on it prior to...
Sorry, are you using the word "concede" to mean "stopped arguing?"
As I said in my first response:
Instead you're saying "before I proceed" and preparing to make arguments against them, too, instead of conceding.
You hadn't yet began your argument, but you indicated that the purpose of your...
I addressed it in my first response. Further it was not a call to "shut down meaningful discussion." The discussion had already happened, the votes were clear. No one, not even Glass or Planck, agreed with adding an extra spatial dimension. It was a call to see if we could resolve the...
The spatial premise is in the OP, it wasn't brought up later. And yes, votes decide the outcome of a thread.
You can discuss and argue with DT and Ultima, but the only reason I kept the thread open to call them was based on your indication that you'd consider their view definitive. If you'd...
I would've been within my rights to close the thread without calling them due to the vote already being decisive enough.
I called them to the thread after ironing out the details based on you indicating that you would concede if they were both in agreement that the reasoning used was wrong...
That would be better suited for QnA or asking them privately. At this point the thread has reached its conclusion and, as predicted, neither of the people that wrote the FAQ agree with the reasoning used. The staff disagreement here is overwhelming and it's been weeks since this started. I'll be...
Me being a fan of something is the usual reason I want to downgrade it. It's embarrassing to check out a character you like and find it's been turned into some absurd caricature of itself.
I'm a big fan of DC, I'm also a big fan of Type-Moon and Re:Zero.
Antifeats rarely are what drive a downgrade. Most often it's that the reasoning for the upgrade was bad or the evidence doesn't actually say what it's made out to say in the profiles.
It is wild to me that anyone thinks this.
Right, by this metric "ultra-strict" can basically be used to describe anyone who does not blindly rubber stamp any and all upgrades.
Sorry, I forgot to follow up on this. I've adjusted this to reflect your suggested changes.
@DontTalkDT @Ultima_Reality. There's a question about the FAQ, as well as DontTalkDT's position. I want this to be quick and painless, no need to read through scans or the threads, it's been boiled down...
The point is that she gives him the same warning twice in different contexts (that if he dies his shade is doomed for eternity). The fact that she gives him this warning for losing to the Warrior of Destiny is not remotely enough information to conclude that his spear does anything to souls...