is this enough for immeasurable speed ? there is 5-D volume. You freely move only on Flat layer axis of 5-D.

moving on 3D space means you move on flat layer of 4-D space volume.

Now There is 5-D volume. You freely move on Flat layer axis of 5-D which means you able move freely on 4-D space volume. So is this enough for immeasurable speed ?

If I remember correctly, this is just higher-dimensional movement, not immeasurable speed. I'm sure it explained somewhere regarding immeasurable speed.

i am little bit confused because moving freely on 4-D space volume means you move to past present future seamlessly.

Short answer: No
Long answer: See here

Bobsican said:

Short answer: No
Long answer: See here

Click to expand...

ok i just read it, and found this :

They can qualify for Immeasurable Speed, however, if the regular dimension of time appears like a spatial dimension from their higher dimensional perspective. That is to say, that it can freely be traversed both forward and backwards, allowing them to access any point in it and move unbound by the notions of time inherent to the lower space. An example of this are the Bulk Beings from Interstellar. However, characters who are merely larger than a timeline in terms of spatial size or occupy more spatial dimensions than the spacetime of a timeline as a whole do not qualify as having Immeasurable speed for the same reason. Characters whose size occupies the time dimension itself, however, can be ranked as being (nigh-)omnipresent throughout time. They wouldn't qualify for Immeasurable, as they can't move through time, on the grounds that they already occupying all of time.

That doesn't really change the validity of the premise unless there's context as to claim that a temporary axis is being treated as something to freely travel, over simply being bigger than a universe.

Physics wise, you're wrong. A 4D spatial volume is purely spatial geometry, it has nothing to do with time travel.

In terms of standards here, no. That by itself is just higher-dimensional movement, not a speed feat as stated by MSahla.

Lilixa said:

moving on 3D space means you move on flat layer of 4-D space volume.

Now There is 5-D volume. You freely move on Flat layer axis of 5-D which means you able move freely on 4-D space volume. So is this enough for immeasurable speed ?

Click to expand...

That's not enough, because when you're talking about dimensions in terms of like spatial dimensions, at best you'd only get Infinite Speed and that's assuming said 5-D volume extends into infinite dimensions.

The only way that you'd get Immeasurable Speed, is if you talk about dimensions in terms of like temporal dimensions, then yes freely moving on the 2nd temporal dimension that's 5-D since regular time as a temporal dimension itself is 4-D. That'd warrant Immeasurable Speed since simply put: Immeasurable Speed is movement unbound by the linear flow of time, you can accomplish this by freely moving in the second temporal dimension that's 5-D since it would work as an imaginary time axis. And yes, imaginary time is actually a thing.

is the guy that capable move on 3rd temporal dimension faster and greater than the guy that moves only 2nd temporal dimension? or i missing something here.

Lilixa said:

is the guy that capable move on 3rd temporal dimension faster and greater than the guy that moves only 2nd temporal dimension? or i missing something here.

Click to expand...

Yes, that's how higher temporal dimensions work