• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

General Godzilla Discussion

Surely Final Wars can get an upgrade then? Based on Keizer being the strongest of the Ghidorah group and the strongest of Godzilla’s enemies, as well as Final Wars Goji being stated to be the strongest Godzilla iirc
 
Seems suspect considering the source for that suggests he first appeared in 1995 which I don't think is ever suggested in the movie itself.
 
Seems suspect considering the source for that suggests he first appeared in 1995 which I don't think is ever suggested in the movie itself.
I think it's definitely referring to Godzilla 2000, since the title literally says "Godzilla 2000: Millennium," making it clear that the entire passage is discussing that version of Godzilla. So the statement about him first appearing in 1995 should also be referring to the Godzilla 2000 version.
 
I think it's definitely referring to Godzilla 2000, since the title literally says "Godzilla 2000: Millennium," making it clear that the entire passage is discussing that version of Godzilla. So the statement about him first appearing in 1995 should also be referring to the Godzilla 2000 version.
Yeah but that's sus, I remember Godzilla appearing for the first time in 1999 in the Millenium version
 
Yeah but that's sus, I remember Godzilla appearing for the first time in 1999 in the Millenium version
No? Humans were already aware of Godzilla's existence before 2000, as Yuji Shinoda had even founded the Godzilla Prediction Network (GPN) to predict Godzilla's landfalls and track his movements. The opening scene of Godzilla 2000 itself shows the GPN tracking Godzilla's movements.
 
No? Humans were already aware of Godzilla's existence before 2000, as Yuji Shinoda had even founded the Godzilla Prediction Network (GPN) to predict Godzilla's landfalls and track his movements. The opening scene of Godzilla 2000 itself shows the GPN tracking Godzilla's movements.
Are you sure? Cause I remember that only in vs Megaguirus
 
Are you sure? Cause I remember that only in vs Megaguirus
Yes, I think Ztes is right, especially since the GPN was specifically created to track and predict Godzilla's landfalls. The opening of Godzilla 2000 even shows them tracking his movements, so it's clear that they already knew about him before the events of the movie.
 
It's weird that Godzilla 2000 is solar system level ONLY based on one source with one vague statement.
It's actually not based on just one source. The blog compiles multiple supplementary sources that support and reinforce the same scaling. The statement you're referring to is only one of several pieces of evidence presented in the blog, so I think the entire collection of sources should be considered before calling the rating vague or unsupported.
 
It's weird that Godzilla 2000 is solar system level ONLY based on one source with one vague statement.
Aside from what Apex mentioned, I don't really think this would be that bad even if it was only one source, since it seems pretty clear to me and it should be taken as seriously as all other guidebook statements. I don't see what makes this any different from other guidebook statements we use.
 
Aside from what Apex mentioned, I don't really think this would be that bad even if it was only one source, since it seems pretty clear to me and it should be taken as seriously as all other guidebook statements. I don't see what makes this any different from other guidebook statements we use.
Exactly. People are acting as if Godzilla 2000 is somehow unique for having its scaling supported by guidebooks, when guidebook statements are regularly used for other Godzilla pages as well. If we're going to accept guidebook material as valid evidence for some incarnations, I don't see why the same standard shouldn't apply to Godzilla 2000.
 
Exactly. People are acting as if Godzilla 2000 is somehow unique for having its scaling supported by guidebooks, when guidebook statements are regularly used for other Godzilla pages as well. If we're going to accept guidebook material as valid evidence for some incarnations, I don't see why the same standard shouldn't apply to Godzilla 2000.
Aside from what Apex mentioned, I don't really think this would be that bad even if it was only one source, since it seems pretty clear to me and it should be taken as seriously as all other guidebook statements. I don't see what makes this any different from other guidebook statements we use.
I agree. It doesn't make sense to single out Godzilla 2000 while accepting similar guidebook statements for other incarnations.
 
Surely Final Wars can get an upgrade then? Based on Keizer being the strongest of the Ghidorah group and the strongest of Godzilla’s enemies, as well as Final Wars Goji being stated to be the strongest Godzilla iirc
You know, you're probably right but this one feels a little more shaky compared to 2000 since that's only like two statements as opposed to the like six completely separate pieces of material talking about 2000 being cracked, though you could back it up with that one G-Fest short showing Monster X fighting Burning Godzilla 2000.
 
Last edited:
God dammit.... I don't like triple posting but I have unfortunate news I just learned. The actress who played Jia in the Monsterverse was killed in a car accident this morning. Rest In Peace.
That's absolutely heartbreaking. Rest in peace. It's such a terrible tragedy, especially for someone so young. My condolences to her family, friends, and everyone who knew her.
 
Horrible news. First time in a while that I felt saddened by the death of an actor or celebrity. Most times it's someone legendary who dies of old age as humans simply do but here, she was just a kid. Sure she was already an adult technically (and surprisingly, time is flying at hyperspeed) but that's even worse, she just reached adulthood, she had her whole life and career in front of her and a car crash took it away. I wish I could send my regards to her family.
 
God dammit.... I don't like triple posting but I have unfortunate news I just learned. The actress who played Jia in the Monsterverse was killed in a car accident this morning. Rest In Peace.
I know, just heard the news. This month has been a ***** in terms of deaths. RIP Kaylee Hottle. It’s genuinely unfair, no one should die at 19.
 
I know, just heard the news. This month has been a ***** in terms of deaths. RIP Kaylee Hottle. It’s genuinely unfair, no one should die at 19.
What do people expect me to say? Should we now not talk about powerscaling for a year or something?

It's been 2 days since the terrible death of Kaylee Hottle so i thought changing the subject to something lighthearted was acceptable.
 
I know this is probably a d*mb question but I want to ask anyway.

Is the true form of ultima "it" actually godzilla or considered godzilla? If you have evidence for yes or no could you please give it? This is important for vs debates
 
I know this is probably a d*mb question but I want to ask anyway.

Is the true form of ultima "it" actually godzilla or considered godzilla? If you have evidence for yes or no could you please give it? This is important for vs debates
"It" and Godzilla are used interchangeably throughout the whole book. You can look at the scans for the causality manipulation, Godzilla Amphibia is referred to as "It" throughout the whole thing and explained how they're the same. Godzilla as a name appears once humanity names it and then we hear the name from the 3rd person POV of Pero3 and the POV of the characters. When describing the POV of the Kumongas on the other hand, "It" is consistently used.

If you're asking if "It" looks like Godzilla then idk maybe, I doubt it has a proper comperhensible appearance in the first place since you can't really "look" like anything in a place without time, space and dimensions as a whole, not in the common understanding of it. It does have a body that it can move there.

If you're asking if Godzilla and "It" are the same entity then yes, they are. It is a bit complicated though. "It" split into two and one half became SHIVA. SHIVA is technically the same as IT and shares the wish to be destroyed as that is IT's wish (for SHIVA to be destroyed cause its useless). SHIVA manifested as the thing we saw and the main trunk of this metaphorical tree, "It", created a body for itself in the universe, the body we know as Godzilla. It's thoughts and actions are Godzilla's thoughts and actions.

Here's a quote of "It" manifesting the Godzilla body into the world, the actions it takes are followed by Godzilla.
"It slowly raises its head. Following that movement, a head is born at the place where no head had existed until then. Or rather, from beyond the rift, a head manifests into this world. It also appears as though it suddenly emerged from the ocean floor. It slowly undulates its body. As though it had existed in that way since a far distant past. It extends its body toward the past as seen from the present, thereby establishing its own existence. Rather than coming into being step by step from a small embryo, it generates its own birth by extending its already grown body into the past. And then it begins to sing. Carried by the song, the creatures that fulfill the role of its eyes begin to flow."
 
Last edited:
"It" and Godzilla are used interchangeably throughout the whole book. You can look at the scans for the causality manipulation, Godzilla Amphibia is referred to as "It" throughout the whole thing and explained how they're the same. Godzilla as a name appears once humanity names it and then we hear the name from the 3rd person POV of Pero3 and the POV of the characters. When describing the POV of the Kumongas on the other hand, "It" is consistently used.

If you're asking if "It" looks like Godzilla then idk maybe, I doubt it has a proper comperhensible appearance in the first place since you can't really "look" like anything in a place without time, space and dimensions as a whole, not in the common understanding of it. It does have a body that it can move there.

If you're asking if Godzilla and "It" are the same entity then yes, they are. It is a bit complicated though. "It" split into two and one half became SHIVA. SHIVA is technically the same as IT and shares the wish to be destroyed as that is IT's wish (for SHIVA to be destroyed cause its useless). SHIVA manifested as the thing we saw and the main trunk of this metaphorical tree, "It", created a body for itself in the universe, the body we know as Godzilla. It's thoughts and actions are Godzilla's thoughts and actions.

Here's a quote of "It" manifesting the Godzilla body into the world, the actions it takes are followed by Godzilla.
"It slowly raises its head. Following that movement, a head is born at the place where no head had existed until then. Or rather, from beyond the rift, a head manifests into this world. It also appears as though it suddenly emerged from the ocean floor. It slowly undulates its body. As though it had existed in that way since a far distant past. It extends its body toward the past as seen from the present, thereby establishing its own existence. Rather than coming into being step by step from a small embryo, it generates its own birth by extending its already grown body into the past. And then it begins to sing. Carried by the song, the creatures that fulfill the role of its eyes begin to flow."
Thank you so much!
 
If you're asking if "It" looks like Godzilla then idk maybe, I doubt it has a proper comperhensible appearance in the first place since you can't really "look" like anything in a place without time, space and dimensions as a whole, not in the common understanding of it. It does have a body that it can move there.
I actually made my own art of what I think "It" looks like. I haven't really seen any art of if anywhere online so it was a bit tricky doing it from imagination.
the_evil_it__godzilla_ultima_true_form__by_zillaboy98yt_dm32xu0-pre.jpg
 
I actually made my own art of what I think "It" looks like. I haven't really seen any art of if anywhere online so it was a bit tricky doing it from imagination.
the_evil_it__godzilla_ultima_true_form__by_zillaboy98yt_dm32xu0-pre.jpg
Cool. Thanks for actually doing an attempt at the eldritch thing. If it was me drawing (if I had skills above garbage) I would've tried giving it a flow sort of thing, maybe give it something tree esque at the same time. It's why I chose the Christmas tree nebula in red as a placeholder, it looked cosmic and sorta like Godzilla. Unexpectedly, people seem to have adopted that image as the representation of "It", I keep seeing it everywhere now.
 
If it was me drawing (if I had skills above garbage) I would've tried giving it a flow sort of thing, maybe give it something tree esque at the same time. It's why I chose the Christmas tree nebula in red as a placeholder, it looked cosmic and sorta like Godzilla.
I did actually use a PNG image of a tree roots, they were just edited with an effect and a coloration that matched the main "body" in the middle of it, its the multiple tendrils around the head. It might be hard to see, but yeah those are just heavily edited tree roots.
 
I could be wrong, but dosen't Godzilla Earth tank 2000 nukes in one of the novels?

If so, how much tons of TNT is that?
 
Back
Top