Your argument actually supports my position more than it refutes it.
P1: Manager Kim states that CQC cannot be copied unless someone knows all of the combat units/stances that make up CQC.
P2: CQC is simply the combination of those combat units/stances used together. Therefore, if someone has already seen all of the required stances, they satisfy Manager Kim's stated requirement.
P3: Daniel witnessed Warren use his combat units during the Minsik fight, and he has also seen Warren use CQC multiple times. Warren's CQC is merely a lesser version of Manager Kim's CQC, meaning the required combat units are fewer or at least no more complex than Manager Kim's.
P3 is entierly based on unsubstantiated assumptions/assertions that you are yet to actually prove
What Daniel witnessed is Warren use the composite version of CQC rather than the individual components(stances) Daniel has seen the techique NOT the stances therfore he does not satisfy propostion 2
As I outlined MK explained that you cannot copy the composite CQC techique (the burst move) without knowing the individual moves(stances) that make up the techique.
Johan was able to copy CQC on his 2nd attempt because he started copying MK's individual stances while fighting him and THEN combined them and copied CQC itself
Daniel has only ever seen Warren perfom the burst move composite techique (CQC) rather than the individual stances
Also you have failed to substantiate or prove why Warren's CQC is inferior or contains less stances compared to MK's, that's a baseless assertion
If I remember correctly MK outright states in 2A that he has taught Warren ALL of his units stances (which is what you need to know in order to perfom CQC), CQC's range/number of circles is more likely an indicator of an individual's speed and the quality of their techique rather than the quanity of their techiques
And even if it were as I said Daniel does NOT satisfy P2 as MK outlined that you CAN'T copy CQC by seeing someone perfom the composite burst move techique you need to see them use the individual stances first and copy all of them which Daniel as far as we are aware has NOT seen
P4: Manager Kim's understanding of Johan's copy ability was incomplete. He initially believed Johan had failed because simply watching CQC itself was insufficient. However, moments later Johan proved him wrong by copying all of Manager Kim's combat units and then performing CQC. This shows Manager Kim did not fully understand the extent or adaptability of Johan's copy ability.
P4 is also wrong. Johan's actions fall in line with and support MK's statement, Johan failed to copy CQC by simply observing MK perform it, he had to copy it in smaller chunks by copying MK's individual stances while fighting him in order to fully copy CQC which satisfies your P2 propstion, Johan copied the individual stances which MK outlined as the requirement and then copied CQC as a result, MK did in fact understand the extent of Johan's copy ability. MK was surpised because he did not consider the possibility of Johan copying the individual stances one at a time and THEN copying CQC
P5: Johan accomplished this while he was nearly blind. Reduced vision inherently reduces one's ability to accurately perceive, memorize, and visualize movements. Despite that disadvantage, he was still able to identify and copy every necessary combat unit before combining them into CQC.
Ok? At best that would just effect the speed and quality of his abbility to copy, but it doesn't prove that he would somehow have a higher chance of brute force copying MK's composite CQC instead of copying the individual stances
C1: Therefore, if a nearly blind Johan could perceive and copy every combat unit from Manager Kim's superior CQC, there is no reason to assume Daniel, who has already witnessed Warren's inferior CQC and his combat units, could not do the same.
I already outlined in this post and my previous post why this is both a flawed and an unsubstantiated conclusion that relies on unsubstantiated baseless assertions that you are yet to prove
Your claim that "Daniel hasn't seen the individual stances" is also unsupported. Manager Kim never said someone has to watch each stance in isolation. His statement is simply that you must know all of the stances. During the Minsik fight, Warren demonstrates his combat units throughout the fight, and CQC itself is literally those combat units chained together. If Daniel copied Warren's martial arts as he normally does, then he would necessarily copy those combat units as well.
Warren's normal martial art is jeet kune do, when he uses his composite CQC that's him using the military martial arts, it isn't until 1A that Warren fused both together and got his own signature CQC (all stated by MK)
Also my claim IS supported because we literally SEE Johan start to copy MK's individual stances in isolation and MK literally comments on that lol
"He is trying to copy my CQC techiques by observing ALL of my stances?!"
As we see a back and fourth of MK using a stance and Johan copying it
MK can't use 2 stances simultaneously since he is not omnipresent so by literal definition Johan is copying MK's stanes individually in a vaccum (to clairfy what I mean by MK can't use 2 stances simultaneously, I am not reffering to him chaining them which is what CQC is I am reffering to him somehow performing 2 moves at once, since you can't both jab and hook someone with your left fist at the same time as that would require your fist to be in 2 places at once simultaneously)
The appeal to Daniel never using CQC is also not evidence that he cannot use it. That is an argument from silence. The series has repeatedly shown Daniel possessing techniques long before actually using them. Kishin Seiken is one example. The absence of usage does not prove the absence of knowledge.
I already outlined that Daniel not using kishin seiken makes sense as the move is highly conditional and can only be used if certain criteria are met, Daniel simply never had the opportunity to use kishin seiken before
Also an argument from sillence is only fallacious if there is a clear provable reason why the author decided to omit Daniel using CQC which he supposedly knows which YOU have NOT outlined
You can't simply keep spamming 'argument from sillence' as a get out of jail free card whenever people call out the fact that what you are arguing for has never been stated, implied, shown, or explained.
This would also count as a fallacy fallacy, which is essentially the claim that a point is wrong because a fallacy was comitted, if I said 'the sky is blue because you are an idiot' that would be an ad hominem because I attacked your character instead of proving my claim, HOWEVER despite my usage of a fallacy my claim IS still in fact true, the sky is in fact blue.
You keep spamming "argument from sillence" and "absence of proof is not proof of absence" as a get out jail free card, without ever addressing WHY there is an absence of proof in the first place
You have failed to address WHY despite Daniel supposedly knowing CQC, we have 0 statements of him using CQC, 0 portrayals of his using CQC, 0 implications or explanations that Daniel knows CQC
The reason your 'argument from sillence' does NOT apply here is because there is no logical explanation for the absence of Daniel using CQC despite there being dozens of scenarios in which Daniel using CQC would have made perfectly valid sense
And don't bring up 'but Daniel had Kishin Seiken in HFBD and he didn't use it!' because the story gave us actual retroactive narrative justification as to why there was an absence of proof prior to Daniel's first use of kishin seiken, because its a conditional move that Daniel can only use under very specific circumstances
CQC is NOT a conditional move that can only be used under certain circumstances, Warren spams it all the god damm time under every circumstance
Drop the debate-bro act, stop spamming fallacies and actually stop and think for a second, just because there is no 'proof of absence' does NOT mean that there is NO absence or that you don't have to address WHY there is a 'absence of proof' for your claim ESPECIALLY when it LOGICALLY contradicts the story's narrative
You're essentially claiming that Daniel KNOWS CQC but chose to and continues to choose, to NEVER use, it including dozens of situations where using it would logically make sense and where NOT using it would be a logical contraction, without actually justifying WHY Daniel WOULDN'T use it if he supposedly knew it
You are also claiming that Daniel KNOWS CQC but for some reason the author chose to NEVER tell or show or hint or portray or explain to us that Daniel knows CQC despite the fact that Daniel knowing CQC would be a pretty big deal, without again justifying why the author would chose to NEVER show or tell us that Daniel knows CQC
Spamming 'but argument from sillence!' is NOT some be all end all proof you need to still actually substantiate your claims in a way that makes sense within the confines of the narrative. If Daniel knows CQC but has chosen to never use it you need to provide an actual satisfying explanation as to WHY he has chosen to NEVER use it under any circumstances including life or death fights where his life and the lives of his loved ones are on the line.
And finally this would also fall under under Rusell's teapot, being unable to concretely disprove Daniel having CQC due to lack of proof of absence does NOT mean the claim is true
A claim is NOT true simply because it can't be disproven
I can just as easily say Daniel doesn't have CQC because PTJ told me in a super secret interview between me and him and then spam 'but there is no proof of absence!' because you have no way to prove that it DIDN'T happen but you don't NEED to prove it didn't happen because I haven't actually substantiated the claim
ALL of this applies to your argument of Gun knowing CQC as well which is what cat and Pyro have been trying to tell you
Finally, your interpretation relies on assuming Daniel never copied Warren's combat units despite witnessing them. The manga never states that. On the contrary, your own premise is that CQC is nothing more than the combination of individual combat units. If Daniel has seen those combat units, then by Manager Kim's own condition, he fulfills the requirement to know CQC.
Lookism also never states that Daniel HAS copied Warren's combat units stances that's just another Russell's teapot you keep asserting as a fact while spamming 'argument from sillence' simply because there is no proof of the contratory
And I already explained up above that seeing the composite move and seeing the individual stances is different and that Daniel has only seen Warren perform the composite burst version which MK explained CAN'T simply be copied ans thus Daniel does not fufill your P2
If you're gonna aggressively 'debate bro' me while simultaneously constantly accusing me of bad faith arguing, at least learn how to actually debate
Idk if anyone has ever told you this
But if you have to rely on spamming fallacies while having an overly aggresive and accustory debating style that just means you aren't skilled at debating, because a good debater doesn't need to rely on fallacies