I am not going to entirely defend of Kuma's words, however
To ignore what they have been replied to is unjust,
Azerty himself have made provocative comments that has resulted into this situation as well: accusing the opposite side as of treating them as "stupid" and tried the act of antagonizing, claiming they are who are not Instant Death supporters and experts have no right to judge against the case of CRT, which is no different of oppression in and of itself. Even claiming agreement of staff when already have been told the r
etired staff cannot be counted or
add ActualitySpaceMan of them to disagreement.
Azerty continues and claims further that the other side knows nothing at all and just derailing, while is not the case as people have been contributing to the thread with their reasoning instead of agendaposting.
Here,
here,
here and
here are some of those examples that—whether wrong or right—contribute to the thread without disrespect, yet been dismissed without proper reasoning.
Qaw himself also have a comment against the thread,
multiples in fact,
which explains the case. Azerty's comment that is replied by Kuma was for the provocation on Azerty's side, I do not try to justify Kuma's comment and use of disrespectful words, but I believe if any actions should be taken it should be on both sides of the argument, Kuma himself stated his problem with the case later on the next comment that he did not liked Azerty's tone.
It seems this comment is trying to defend Kuma while also presenting yourself as if you are not defending him, and what you said here is also incorrect.
I did not tell anyone that they are not allowed to participate against the topic; on the contrary, I said in the same comment that they can disagree as much as they want, but on the condition that they respect our view and the supporters ↓
“I’m not saying you can’t disagree, but don’t be stubborn and keep saying you weren’t refuted or that nobody responded to you, etc.”
Regarding the retired member, I did not ignore the matter. I have some doubts about it, and I already said that I would contact one of the staff members to discuss the issue. I did not reject it ↓
By the way, I confirmed with a human resources member (specifically @SomebodyData ) and they confirms that we don't count vote from staff that have retired, even if that happened while this CRT was still open, so you should remove Reiner's vote.
Post with 1 views.
imgchest.com
An yeah update the vote tally since spaceman disagreed, so other staff don't misunderstand
Click to expand...
Regarding Reiner, I will go to one of the staff members to ask about this matter myself. As for Spaceman, he objected because you already provided incorrect information, so I will wait for his response now.
It is true regarding ActualitySpaceMan, but that was due to incorrect information from Astral himself. Astral
here admits that it was his mistake. After that, ActualitySpaceMan was no longer used to justify his view again. Also, I personally did not even consider him part of the supporters, and I was asking him to justify his position in more than one comment. Even so, I simply forgot to remove him from the supporters list, but you can verify that I was still asking for his stance up to now ↓
@Elizhaa @Vietthai96 @DarkDragonMedeus
Can you clarify your opinion now after knowing that worlds are universes?
I left for like a few hours. What's going on?
As I told you,
@Oblivion_Of_The_Endless and what is clearly stated in the cosmology, and what I already explained to you, worlds are simply universes in the normal sense.
You already agreed that the Abyss is universe-sized since it is also a world, and worlds are universes. But because of the incorrect things Astral said, you changed your opinion and asked for clarification, and it has now been clarified. So, will I now keep you in the agreeing list, or are there any other issues?
Yes, it is true that he does not know what was discussed in the previous thread or what exists in the cosmology. He himself admitted it here, and he even said he does not remember that discussion. He also did not know that it had already been accepted, yet he still argues and opens long discussions about things that have already been agreed upon, without even knowing what has been accepted. By the way, he personally showed that ↓
This has already been discussed in a previous thread and accepted as universe-sized, so you are now reopening an issue that has already been addressed.
The Demon King novel was removed, and it was thereby accepted that worlds are universes, and it has been reclassified again.
Currently, the world is classified as Low 2-C.
If you disagree with that, you can open another thread instead of derailing this one
- Celestial Foundation: Low 2-C
Click to expand...
Ah, that's my bad for not noticing..
Could you link the thread where it was accepted? I couldn't find it linked anywhere while checking the page's edit history.
It was accepted
in this thread by multiple staff members that TDIUK cannot be used anymore due to the author scraping away the whole story. Consequently, this means that CFs are just normal universes now from ID statements. Thats why it was also concluded in that same thread that CFs would be Low 2-C from now on.
Ah, so my guess was right. Thanks for clarifying.
Also, this is not an insult toward him. I am only stating the truth, and anyone could say the same about me in a normal way, such as saying “you don’t know anything about what was discussed in the previous thread.” That would not be an insult if I genuinely did not know and started going off-topic. Likewise, someone arguing about things that have already been accepted and discussed is, of course, derailing and distracting the topic.
Kuma always crosses his limits, and this is not the first time honestly. So do not try to misrepresent things against me in the wrong way.
vsbattles.com
