• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

AI slop CRT
I dont think it is AI. There are really these type of Guys. and the Scale also looks like a Discord slop. But the Answers are Pretty sure AI
 
I dont think it is AI. There are really these type of Guys. and the Scale also looks like a Discord slop. But the Answers are Pretty sure AI
he has a replies from chat gpt in the text of the CRT and shit like "killing is actually bad" in itallics in the middle of the thread.
 
@EfeTahir7 Please don't make nonsensical content revisions.

Ignoring the fact that you clearly generated it with AI, it makes absurd statements like that Spider-Man should scale to the infinity stones because he supposedly briefly resisted being turned into dust, and is furthermore an absolute mess with no clear summary.
 
I am not used ai and Even Spider-Man's brief resistance to the rocks puts him at least on that level, and nothing you said is a debunk.
You literally left the initial part of its response in there. "Understood. Here is the text with the corrected style, maintaining all links and the original structure:"

Regardless, we have certain discussion rules which were not followed, for example: "The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page."

You need to read through and understand our policies and make a well-constructed post if you want to be taken seriously.

That includes our Site Rules, our Discussion Rules, and all the stuff in the Welcome Message.
 
@EfeTahir7 Please don't make nonsensical content revisions.

Ignoring the fact that you clearly generated it with AI, it makes absurd statements like that Spider-Man should scale to the infinity stones because he supposedly briefly resisted being turned into dust, and is furthermore an absolute mess with no clear summary.
I haven't used artificial intelligence and Even Spider-Man's brief resistance to the Infinity Stones puts him at least on the level of H1C, and Nothing you said is a refutation ; you just don't want to accept it right now.
 
You literally left the initial part of its response in there. "Understood. Here is the text with the corrected style, maintaining all links and the original structure:"

Regardless, we have certain discussion rules which were not followed, for example: "The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page."

You need to read through and understand our policies and make a well-constructed post if you want to be taken seriously.

That includes our Site Rules, our Discussion Rules, and all the stuff in the Welcome Message.
I only use translation, I never use artificial intelligence.
 
I only use translation, I never use artificial intelligence.
It's not against our rules to use AI regardless, but I'm telling you that your thread was low-quality and not in compliance with our discussion rules.

This thread is not the place to debate it. If you remake your thread in a proper format then I'll be happy to reject it there and explain to you in detail my reasoning.
 
Yapay zekâ kullanımı kurallarımıza aykırı değil, ancak size şunu söylemek istiyorum ki, açtığınız konu düşük kaliteliydi ve tartışma kurallarımıza uymuyordu.

Bu konu başlığı, bu tartışma için uygun bir yer değil. Eğer konu başlığınızı uygun bir formatta yeniden oluşturursanız, orada reddetmekten ve gerekçelerimi ayrıntılı olarak açıklamaktan memnuniyet duyarım.
I didn't actually use AI, I just used translation, and what exactly didn't you like about the discussion I started? Because instead of counter-arguments, people kept writing sarcastic things like "son."
 
Gerçekten yapay zeka kullanmadım, sadece çeviri kullandım ve başlattığım tartışmada tam olarak neyi beğenmediniz? Çünkü karşı argümanlar yerine sürekli "Oğlum" gibi alaycı şeyler yazılıyordu.
It needs to start or end with a summary. You should include which characters are being affected, along with a short explanation why.

In addition, though not technically required, it would help a lot if you reformatted it so that it was easier to read. Right now there's a lot of random bolding and too many line breaks and stuff.

I merely closed it for now, it's not deleted. If you add a summary and clean it up the best you can I'll re-open it.

I'll also tell the people there to be constructive and stop just making fun of you.
 
It needs to start or end with a summary. You should include which characters are being affected, along with a short explanation why.

In addition, though not technically required, it would help a lot if you reformatted it so that it was easier to read. Right now there's a lot of random bolding and too many line breaks and stuff.

I merely closed it for now, it's not deleted. If you add a summary and clean it up the best you can I'll re-open it.

I'll also tell the people there to be constructive and stop just making fun of you.
Ty and I'll do as you say and start a new post
 
Back
Top