• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

I think this is necessary to clear up since this adds some context to my report
This isn't the place to discuss translations for any verse. That is an issue for Content Revision threads or General Discussion threads, not the Rule Violation Report Thread. So can I ask everyone to please stop discussing it here?
It's not even about the discussion; it is just him refusing to acknowledge when told that he is wrong and misleading. He didn't even check the verse page where Slimereader is explicitly stated to be an accepted source... (Nor accepted it when told, and warned about it)
  • Due to the recurring issue of misleading or dishonest machine-translated (edited-MTL) content within this verse (both WN and LN), particularly when used to support major arguments or upgrades, the use of human-edited MTLs is strictly prohibited unless they are verified by one of the official Translation Helpers (TLs) or a user with proven fluency in Japanese. However, exceptions may be made for human-edited MTLs originating from well-regarded and trusted sources that show no signs of intentional misrepresentation or manipulation, such as Slime Reader. This is to ensure accuracy, consistency, and prevent misinterpretation or manipulation of source material. Any future CRTs or profile changes that use unverified human-edited MTLs will be considered invalid and subject to reversal.

So far, all he has done is act like this ever since he came back... And yes, this is only a discussion in the first place since he is just straight up repeating and complaining about the same stuff wherever he goes (and the only thing he does on the site) even when being proven and told otherwise.
 
@PRIDEXEGO Play nice, please. This is what I will call an informal warning, which is me politely asking you to abide by the rules of the wiki without making a big case about it. Whatever you believe about any given verse, you must act cordially towards other users. Them's the rules.
I think it fair to extend the same to @Jepilstiltskin.
Your ranting is useless bro. Take it somewhere else, or... I don't know, create an actual decent CRT about it? You're literally wailing like a baby typing this.
Yes, he can, and it's already on the profile. Try to fuking read 🙏
 
I think it fair to extend the same to @Jepilstiltskin.
Huh? How would you expect me to react to a guy who's repeatedly using the thread as a place to vent (and has done the same thing across multiple threads, for that matter)? I might have overreacted a little, sure, but given the circumstances, I don't think I was really violating any rules.

For what it's worth, my intention was simply to get the guy to leave the thread and stop derailing it. Things only got a bit heated because he didn't seem interested in doing that.
 
Two wrong don't make a right. Just because he act badly to you doesn't mean you have excuse to act badly against him. Of course we understand your feeling and why you acted that way so FinePoint just want to call you out so you could recognize the issues and stop acting badly
I did not even once reply I only reply him once he replied me with this "Your ranting is useless bro.
"Take it somewhere else, or... I don't know, create an actual decent CRT about it? You're literally wailing like a baby typing this."

And still I mention nothing to him. Its only second time he did comment with exact same thing I replied to him. (those comments are deleted)

And I did not lead the thread astry my original comment is who i think will win. It the follow up comments that lead astray that was me explaining what they are using as Win con.
 
Last edited:
Two wrong don't make a right. Just because he act badly to you doesn't mean you have excuse to act badly against him. Of course we understand your feeling and why you acted that way so FinePoint just want to call you out so you could recognize the issues and stop acting badly
This is correct, yes. 🙏
 
Update on the Demon_Lord thing, I am going to adjust his ban to permanent, as he took the time to go to my Discord, accuse me of being complicit with Damage's offsite works (that is, that I am "protecting" him), and threaten me. Just letting the thread know.
 
Jerry59 caused the unfounded deletion of an adequate page that used accepted calcs, proper formatting, and maybe minor problems that could have been touched up with a quick edit at most, it seems like spite to destroy another user's work.
 
Jerry59 caused the unfounded deletion of an adequate page that used accepted calcs, proper formatting, and maybe minor problems that could have been touched up with a quick edit at most, it seems like spite to destroy another user's work.
That hardly seems like a violation to me and more so a misunderstanding at worst.
 
Jerry59 caused the unfounded deletion of an adequate page that used accepted calcs, proper formatting, and maybe minor problems that could have been touched up with a quick edit at most, it seems like spite to destroy another user's work.
Your work is still safe in your sandbox. the Powers & Abilities and Speed section did not contain any scans, and the profile lacked references, both of which cannot be fixed with some additional work by random users. Stamina section also uses invalid ratings such as "high". You are expected to publish complete profiles, not ones that are only halfway finished.
 
You are expected to publish complete profiles, not ones that are only halfway finished.
Nah, it was perfectly serviceable for 95% of people who read it, but it's clear nothing will ever be learned from how many users burn out chasing the obtuse and neurotic new interpretations of rules that get made up every month, so I am done trying with this absolute BS.
 
Nah, it was perfectly serviceable for 95% of people who read it, but it's clear nothing will ever be learned from how many users burn out chasing the obtuse and neurotic new interpretations of rules that get made up every month, so I am done trying with this absolute BS.
The page quite literally is piss poor in quality.

"Wall level (Able to completely shatter barrels through physical blows.)" With the link in question directing to the References for Common Feats, but not the feat in question(???). The whole justification has 0 of his feats shown. Same with the rest of the statistics.

Anyone can read it and understand it, but literally nobody will be able to understand where any of the ratings actually come from because you don't use any scans or references. It's not obtuse, it's quite literally basic and proper etiquette.
 
Nah, it was perfectly serviceable for 95% of people who read it, but it's clear nothing will ever be learned from how many users burn out chasing the obtuse and neurotic new interpretations of rules that get made up every month, so I am done trying with this absolute BS.
No, asking for profiles to be complete before being published has been a standard since pretty early on, I'm not sure where you're getting that this is a new interpretation of a rule.

All you have to do is apply some of the criticisms before release and then publish it again once you're done. (y)
 
Scans are not a hard requirement, but our rules do absolutely require references. If the page had no references, users are in a position where they cannot reliably source them themselves (barring some familiarity) and, even if they can, it's a very time consuming process to find everything referenced in the profile, especially if it also lacked scans (which are really nice to have, just not a matter of deletion if it lacks them).

This is not a rule violation, but it also doesn't mean your profile sucks or whatever. Just publish it with references.
 

Reporting Shion who randomly started insulting me for just saying a character used all his abilities and because he never used specific things of said abilities "I am a filthy larper" "low low low" etc

 
I did call you a larper, because you are one. And low low low isn't an insult, its a song lyric. I never personally insulted you, only your points which were simply wrong and you know it. Let me guess that made you mad and you needed to get back to me?
 
I did call you a larper, because you are one. And low low low isn't an insult, its a song lyric. I never personally insulted you, only your points which were simply wrong.
"I never personally insulted you"

"I did call you a larper because you are one"

Ignoring that you are expecting me to have the same standards about using "all" his powers, acting disrespecful instead of explaining your opinion from the beginning and also literally saying "but he mastered blood abilities so he should have those" when he never use them in the series which is literally your opinion

Yeah, I don't want to read anything from you again if this is your attitude beginning any conversation

Edit: "That made you mad"
You can count the times I have been here asking for a report with your fingers, if you literally ruined my patience in less than 5 minutes which is unusual then I am sorry but I am not gonna bottle up my feelings

If this is not reportable, then at least someone tell me how or make me be able to not see his messages again, I don't want to deal with him anymore

Final Edit: I did it myself, ignore this message, bye Shion
 
Last edited:
"I never personally insulted you"

"I did call you a larper because you are one"
Larper is an insult to you?? Its literally just saying you are talking about something you didn't read, which is just true. Who even thinks Live Action Roleplayer is an insult, seriously??

Rest of your comment is straight up powerscaling, this has nothing to do with the rules. Yes I believe you were completely wrong when you said he used his entire arsenal and after I listed like a bunch of examples you simply responded by saying they don't count as arsenal parts, claiming I am a liar and then calling me a clown for it. Additionally he DOES show he can use explosive blood, so you are once again wrong. I know its hard to accept when you are wrong, but it is an important skill everyone must learn.

Now we are filling the thread with useless banter, off I go
 

Reporting Shion who randomly started insulting me for just saying a character used all his abilities and because he never used specific things of said abilities "I am a filthy larper" "low low low" etc
Larper is an insult to you?? Its literally just saying you are talking about something you didn't read, which is just true. Who even thinks Live Action Roleplayer is an insult, seriously??
I'm certain you know that the recent slang definition, and the one you were using here, refers to someone being a poser, not to mention you explicitly added the qualifier 'filthy' to it.

That's not the worst as far as insults go, but you are indeed insulting them and your tone in general is extremely passive aggressive.
 
do I even need to say something lol. Ok so quick edit, OP again breaking the same rules he was told not to break for the 3TH TIME, I think we need to actually take messures now, the 3 warnings werent enough for him, he still doing the same things he got warned for. So yeah pls check this

 
Last edited:
do I even need to say something lol. Ok so quick edit, OP again breaking the same rules he was told not to break for the 3TH TIME, I think we need to actually take messures now, the 3 warnings werent enough for him, he still doing the same things he got warned for. So yeah pls check this

How did I violate the rules? Can you clarify this matter?

This person comes here every second to report me, even without me doing anything, in order to get me banned, even for things I wouldn’t do in the first place.
 
How did I violate the rules? Can you clarify this matter?

This person comes here every second to report me, even without me doing anything, in order to get me banned, even for things I wouldn’t do in the first place.
Its mainly the simple site rules of 3 moderators approval being needed. If you have 1 disagreement then its not an issue unless its 2 disagreement in which case you need 4 approval to out veto the opposition.

Also saying staff not knowing the work is abit disrespectful as it calls into question their evaluation abilities. Its up to the supporters to fully explain their stance if the staff member does not understand your point.
 
your in purpose omiting 2 staff disagreements because you think they know less than you, thats literal vote manipulation
I did not manipulate the votes. What I said does not mean that I was going to ignore the votes; that is simply your assumption and is not supported by any evidence. Also, I did not expect that you would come and report me because of that comment. I happened to pass by here by coincidence and saw you reporting me.

The thread ended well, the revisions were applied, and no problems occurred at all.

Its mainly the simple site rules of 3 moderators approval being needed. If you have 1 disagreement then its not an issue unless its 2 disagreement in which case you need 4 approval to out veto the opposition.

Also saying staff not knowing the work is abit disrespectful as it calls into question their evaluation abilities. Its up to the supporters to fully explain their stance if the staff member does not understand your point.
I am not questioning his ability to evaluate or his expertise at all. I only said that he is not very familiar with this series, and that is not diminishing his ability to evaluate in any way. I also explained the matter to him myself. I know that the responsibility of explaining falls on the supporters, and I did that, and the discussion ended well. You just like creating problems over things that did not happen.

 
I think Hecky is usually cheeky with some comments but this is really not being called "Rude" here

I can understand if people are more prone to this and mistaking this as rule violation if the topic is exhausting them however he has not directly insulted your intelligence or capability to debate here nor was he directly hostile in that thread
 
It's a "Smooth brain" emoji. Which is basically the equivalent of saying the word "Stupid." But it's hard to tell if he's calling the argument stupid or the person stupid; it's not really a violation if it's the former but it is rude if it's the latter. But it would be better if he clairified.

Edit: Looks like he already did, I think Hecky is fine.
 
Reporting @Azertyhuuh for coming into a Kuro vs Goku matchup, only to completely and utterly side track the decision with Yogiri whining and claiming how Yogiri would have destroyed Kuro back in 2023...


And yes, he has done this before and was warned about it, but was not punched "since he would not repeat it"....
 
Reporting @Azertyhuuh for coming into a Kuro vs Goku matchup, only to completely and utterly side track the decision with Yogiri whining and claiming how Yogiri would have destroyed Kuro back in 2023...


And yes, he has done this before and was warned about it, but was not punched "since he would not repeat it"....
This is a character battle discussion thread, not a content review thread. I was not aware that versus battles were considered official as well.

Also, the moderator could have simply deleted the comment, and I do not see any need for you to report me here.
 
Back
Top