• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Destiny: Winnower and Gardener 1-A and Abilities

8,948
989
This thread is a sequel to this one.

Sandbox

This thread can be added to the list of 1-A threads, while the previous one gets listed as rejected. It's primary purpose however, is for the abilities within the sandbox to get evaluated. For the record, these abilities would also apply to the eventual Gardener page for obvious reasons.

For reference, here is the thread in which Light and Darkness got accepted as having Type 5 Acausality and here's the one for Type 2 Nonduality.

Thanks for your time.
 
Last edited:
Always wondered whether or not 1-A was a possibility, but powerscaling Destiny on Vs Battles always intimidated me. Maybe one day I'll make that Titan page sandbox I keep thinking about...

Either way, can't wait to see this unfold when the time comes. The page is nicely done and the quotes you've chosen are perfect. Excellent work.
 
Last edited:
Oh, been a while.

Anyway: As said in the previous thread, 1-A is pretty straightforward all-in-all. The abilities are fine as well, for the most part, but Nonduality seems a bit under-justified. What's with it?

Ah nice. Thanks for the eval.

Nonduality is the one I was least confident about yes. But I'm about to get off the computer, so I'll explain my thought process tomorrow.
 
Oh, been a while.

Anyway: As said in the previous thread, 1-A is pretty straightforward all-in-all. The abilities are fine as well, for the most part, but Nonduality seems a bit under-justified. What's with it?

Okay, so the rules of the game are the basis for everything, all of creation. So either the rules are all dual systems, or dual systems are a manifestation of the rules. Now the new rules, Light and Darkness, were explicitly separated from the rest of the rules, so that they couldn't be compromised. This shows that the Winnower and Gardener can just create new logical systems should they so desire. But they aren't beholden to the rules themselves.
 
1A looks fine. But nonduality 3 and NEP 2??? ND 3 need more specific explanation about truth states while NEP 2 need to be non-existence to begin with, also why CM 1 i think just manipulating the rule are law manipulation alone
 
Back
Top