• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DbzDB2
Reaction score
1,220

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Posting here instead of on the RVT since I'm not staff.

    I seriously, seriously do not think that calling you a "bozo" after you said he "can't powerscale" is worthy of a permanent ban, even in the face of previous bans. "Bozo" is such a ludicrously tame insult, and it was in response to an insult of your own.
    DbzDB2
    DbzDB2
    You don't know the context. He was saying that Character A can beat Character B, but here's the thing. What he was saying was objectively wrong, in fact, it was ridiculous. I'm not saying this to insult him, but I'm saying it because it's fact. What he said was like saying that Krillin can beat Goku in Dragon Ball. He blatantly proved himself that he cannot powerscale, and I simply pointed that out. That's not an insult. Literally everyone in the thread who saw his argument disagreed with him heavily.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I think it's very difficult to be "objectively wrong" about whether one character can beat another, even if you try to be. I doubt that someone operating in earnest would slip up like that. And if they hadn't, then you're just insulting them.

    But you didn't provide the context for us to look at, so I can't really confirm or deny.

    EDIT: After the context being linked, it looked like you were both providing arguments with well-formed reasons, so it doesn't seem like he's objectively wrong, just has a different interpretation of the material.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top