- 126
- 9
Now, in Halloween 4, in the scene where Michael Myers and Loomis first meet, Loomis fires a gun, and when the screen changes, Michael Myers is gone.
Currently, Michael Myers' page features my accepted subsonic calculation.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Now I will present arguments to refute these claims.
In the novel Halloween 4, Michael Myers is shot and falls onto the container. This means he didn't directly dodge it.
It also says that Loomis then immediately ran to the table and looked for Michael Myers, but couldn't see him there; we see the same thing in the film.
You might say we don't see any bullet marks on Michael Myers here, but bullet marks don't always need to be clearly visible. The best example of this is what happened in Halloween 4. At the end of Halloween 4, Michael Myers was riddled with bullets.
But in Halloween 5, despite all those bullet marks, there wasn't a single trace of a mark on her dress.
So, it's not necessary for every bullet mark to be visible. In fact, in the Thorn Timeline, we didn't see any clearly visible bullet marks on Michael Myers' body. And in Loomis's shooting, Michael Myers only takes one bullet, and it's not clear where it hit.
Let's assume the novel Halloween 4 is wrong and contradictory.
However, we can't definitively say he dodged in the film. Because if we look at the scene, Loomis is only seen while firing. Before his last shot, the area where Michael Myers was supposed to be is visible, but Michael Myers isn't there.
Since we don't see Michael Myers on stage, we can't definitively say whether he dodged the bullet. He may have moved before being shot, which raises the possibility of aimdodge.
vsbattles.com
So we don't see Michael Myers running away; Michael Myers may have moved while being aimed at or just before being shot.
There are still many possibilities like that, so saying Michael Myers definitely dodged the bullet would only be an appeal to possibility.
www.logicallyfallacious.com
In conclusion, since Michael Myers was shot as stated in the novel, and there isn't enough evidence in the film to prove he dodged the bullet, the film needs to be removed.
Currently, Michael Myers' page features my accepted subsonic calculation.
Michael Myers (Thorn Timeline)
At the young age of six, Michael Myers killed his elder sister Judith and was placed into an institution. Fifteen years later, Michael escapes and returns home on Halloween to stalk and kill a fresh set of victims, focusing his efforts on Laurie Strode. Referred to as "pure evil" by his...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Now I will present arguments to refute these claims.
In the novel Halloween 4, Michael Myers is shot and falls onto the container. This means he didn't directly dodge it.
It also says that Loomis then immediately ran to the table and looked for Michael Myers, but couldn't see him there; we see the same thing in the film.
You might say we don't see any bullet marks on Michael Myers here, but bullet marks don't always need to be clearly visible. The best example of this is what happened in Halloween 4. At the end of Halloween 4, Michael Myers was riddled with bullets.
But in Halloween 5, despite all those bullet marks, there wasn't a single trace of a mark on her dress.
So, it's not necessary for every bullet mark to be visible. In fact, in the Thorn Timeline, we didn't see any clearly visible bullet marks on Michael Myers' body. And in Loomis's shooting, Michael Myers only takes one bullet, and it's not clear where it hit.
Let's assume the novel Halloween 4 is wrong and contradictory.
However, we can't definitively say he dodged in the film. Because if we look at the scene, Loomis is only seen while firing. Before his last shot, the area where Michael Myers was supposed to be is visible, but Michael Myers isn't there.
Since we don't see Michael Myers on stage, we can't definitively say whether he dodged the bullet. He may have moved before being shot, which raises the possibility of aimdodge.
Aim dodging
So the question came up which standard we should apply concerning aim dodging. The OBD, according to their article on it, interprets all reactions to projectiles as aim dodging as long as there is no evidence speaking against it. The question is, if we want to handle it like that again or...
So we don't see Michael Myers running away; Michael Myers may have moved while being aimed at or just before being shot.
There are still many possibilities like that, so saying Michael Myers definitely dodged the bullet would only be an appeal to possibility.
Appeal to Possibility - Logically Fallacious
When a conclusion is assumed not because it is probably true, but because it is possible that it is true, no matter how improbable.
www.logicallyfallacious.com
In conclusion, since Michael Myers was shot as stated in the novel, and there isn't enough evidence in the film to prove he dodged the bullet, the film needs to be removed.
Last edited:
