Question about Omnipotence?

[Tyrone_Dawson]

Could a character who is not necessarily the strongest be granted omnipotence.

The character is immutable, self-existing, omnipresent, omniscient, and “absolute”. However there is a stronger character called The
Absolute who I think qualifies for Teir 0 but the character in question I’m talking about is H1-A+ and basically is omnipotent besides being under The Absolute. Either way is it possible for multiple characters to be Omnipotent?

 

[Quantumnessmechanics]

No.

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

As said above

 

[Hecky2222]

Depends on how it is portrayed.

What you said above isn't mutually exclusive for T0, Type 2 can have same things too. If character above js portrays better requirements for T0 ig you can argue for it.

But smth that js doesn't fit T0 predating Type 2 would be js anti feat.

 

[Tyrone_Dawson]

Depends on how it is portrayed.

What you said above isn't mutually exclusive for T0, Type 2 can have same things too. If character above js portrays better requirements for T0 ig you can argue for it.

But smth that js doesn't fit T0 predating Type 2 would be js anti feat.

No it’s not something predating or stronger than the T0 being but rather a character who is utterly free and immutable while still being confined within the T0 being but not within “existence”.

 

[Tyrone_Dawson]

No it’s not something predating or stronger than the T0 being but rather a character who is utterly free and immutable while still being confined within the T0 being but not within “existence”.

Now that I look back at it, it was a stupid question.

I was under the impression that being immutable and able to do anything in provided it aligns with the 3 laws of thought would be enough to qualify for omnipotence on some level.

 

[DoFliesCallUsWalks]

Is "nigh-omnipotence" more accurate? If it even exists as a qualifier

 

[SuperNova55555]

A verse can have multiple characters that qualify for T0; they would just be downgraded to H1A+