- 8,745
- 3,210
Atp nuke the entire UES page and make a new one.Acausality type 3 for the entire path of erudition btw
I really wanna touch the ues page but man this verse (and staff) needs a break![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Atp nuke the entire UES page and make a new one.Acausality type 3 for the entire path of erudition btw
I really wanna touch the ues page but man this verse (and staff) needs a break![]()
Honestly this us the only time id agree with deleting a page for this verse and rewriting itAtp nuke the entire UES and make a new one.
Agree with Aca10 UES
Acausality type 3 for the entire path of erudition btw
I really wanna touch the ues page but man this verse (and staff) needs a break![]()
Well because its applied correctly thereI don't understand why some of you are calling the use of precedence as "whataboutism"? It only doesn't work if it's applied wrongly there too.
Doesn't seem like it.Well because its applied correctly there
Are you joking? It's quite literally the same thing based on the justifications unless there's more to it?Frankly the tensura useage is actually the definition of the ability while lygus is just larping multilocation
Edit: reading pookie scoop's comment since it didn't load before; if they aren't scattered across 2C distance and exist under the same time axis, they can't be Aca3 even if they're each independent. But I'm not involving myself with cosmology so y'all solve it amongst yourself
You can use other verses to apply a precedent.SO let me get this straight, instead of actually arguing for the ability, the support has been through the entire thread of arguing with Tensura instead... Peak..
I have said this dozens of times, don't use other verses as arguments for your own.
The funny part is that the ones that do only do it if they have no better/good arguments themself, and most of the time they don't even understand the verse/situation itself...You can use other verses to apply a precedent.
Does that mean it would be Aca 3 if the clones were sent to a different timeline?
If those are 2-C spscetimes ig but even then lygus doesnt replace himself with them they’re just clones all doing their own thingDoes that mean it would be Aca 3 if the clones were sent to a different timeline?
Then Zandar fits without question.If those are 2-C spscetimes ig but even then lygus doesnt replace himself with them they’re just clones all doing their own thing
The text specifically claims that they were sent across different timelines with the goal of killing Nous. There's no doubt that they exist across different axis's. The text also says that they communicate with each other and they share the one goal of destroying Nous. This clearly means that if Lygus failed, another fragment would show up to finish the job.“2-C galaxies”![]()
For some reason this reminds me of the Simon vs Anti-Spiral fight...“2-C galaxies”![]()
@Cipher72 are you gonna take that slander?For some reason this reminds me of the Simon vs Anti-Spiral fight...
Nether has some weird obsession with wanting what other verses have, and you get gems like this andthis.
Anyways, I remember being baffled after seeing the justification for it, so I agree with removing it.


It was you who kept pestering the supporters about Wuthering Waves and Genshin Impact having Plot Manipulation but Honkai isn't so both of these verses > Honkai (despite them being negative-diffed by the Aeons LOL)
You were the one who's pushing for Plot Manipulation anyway, and you BLAMED ME for making that thread after I made it myself despite you being the one PUSHING for it
"Oh yeah look guys Genshin has non-combat applicable Plot Manipulation and Conceptual Manipulation Type 2, they solo Honkai!!"
Guess what happened when Castorice made Khaslana vs 4 Shades and 5 Sinners? You never noticed me about the Q&A, literally all you told me was that "why didn't you get it accepted first for like Reality Warping, Subjective Reality and Dream Manipulation before going for Plot Manipulation?" nothing about this MENTIONED the Q&AThing is, I made a Q&A and from the replies I noticed it wasnt going to qualify, you proceed to make the thread on your own despite that.
I have been joking about this for a while, and I only keep doing it bc you always fall for it lol. Anyways, lets not derail this thread
This basically, it's clearly 2-C given it mentions various space-times and I don't see how anyone would just strawman this part offThe text specifically claims that they were sent across different timelines with the goal of killing Nous. There's no doubt that they exist across different axis's. The text also says that they communicate with each other and they share the one goal of destroying Nous. This clearly means that if Lygus failed, another fragment would show up to finish the job.
There's no thread here.
What does that even mean?Anything but arguing why for lygus and 2C gslaxuesk
Nether has some weird obsession with wanting what other verses have, and you get gems like this andthis.
Anyways, I remember being baffled after seeing the justification for it, so I agree with removing it.
It was you who kept pestering the supporters about Wuthering Waves and Genshin Impact having Plot Manipulation but Honkai isn't so both of these verses > Honkai (despite them being negative-diffed by the Aeons)
You were the one who's pushing for Plot Manipulation anyway, and you BLAMED ME for making that thread after I made it myself despite you being the one PUSHING for it
"Oh yeah look guys Genshin has non-combat applicable Plot Manipulation and Conceptual Manipulation Type 2, they solo Honkai!!"
![]()
Shiro is actually a hypocrite man, I wouldn't even bring up Wuthering Waves and Genshin Impact having Plot Manipulation or not if it wasn't you who told me that they had one in which you used that as an attempt to ragebait that they solo Honkai (when they don't, really)
Who had the idea first in mind to make them have Plot Manipulation through Project Stigma? No shit, that was you, if it were me I'd push it through a different argument (that being the Honkai Salvation Log and Elation stuff)
Thing is, I made a Q&A and from the replies I noticed it wasnt going to qualify, you proceed to make the thread on your own despite that.
I have been joking about this for a while, and I only keep doing it bc you always fall for it lol. Anyways, lets not derail this thread
Guess what happened when Castorice made Khaslana vs 4 Shades and 5 Sinners? You never noticed me about the Q&A, literally all you told me was that "why didn't you get it accepted first for like Reality Warping, Subjective Reality and Dream Manipulation before going for Plot Manipulation?" nothing about this MENTIONED the Q&A
Surprisingly the nep thread didnt go this bad because certain people werent thereLost an argument -> Derailing thread
Avg Hoyo thread
Nobody but OP and supporters are losing the argument however. There's clear cut evidence and justifications on top of an existing precedentLost an argument -> Derailing thread
Avg Hoyo thread
There is the precedent that was mentioned in this thread too. Unless you believe that that one should go too then?Lygus's nine vessels are manifestations of a single consciousness rather than independent temporal or alternate-universe versions of himself. So yeah it needs to go.
Again, you just fully ignored what Twilight said, Lygus is a "single consciousness", while the tensura examples, are multiple egos, thus capable of thinking and acting independently from each other.There is the precedent that was mentioned in this thread too. Unless you believe that that one should go too then?
Hardly. I assume you are a tourist, no offense but each clone has its own free will which is why Lycurgus was able to sever his connection to Zandar and the other clones and become his own individual after his defeat.Again, you just fully ignored what Twilight said, Lygus is a "single consciousness", while the tensura examples, are multiple egos, thus capable of thinking and acting independently from each other.
Mate, every single verse has its own context, so let's stop with this whataboutismThere is the precedent that was mentioned in this thread too. Unless you believe that that one should go too then?
Whataboutism isn't comparing precedents.Mate, every single verse has its own context, so let's stop with this whataboutism
I didn't really want to argue over this but
Assuming what boops said, the fact that the "space time" refer to galaxies is already a disqualifier since Aca3 requires 2C distance or the other self being under a different time axis that isn't effected by the destruction of the original one (so that the destruction of one doesn't effect the other).
I won't explain how tensura ais different cuz this is NOT A TENSURA THREAD. If you want to know about that then go to Tensura's general discussion and ask it![]()