Could this be considered Paraconsistent Physiology?

[Tyrone_Dawson]

The narrative states and I quote "As for regular angels, they are also unique in their existence as every single angel exists but also doesn't exist, they don't exist but also exist, they are nothing but they are still something, same thing goes for us Arc Angels just to a higher degree.


Essentially every single angel is a being that doesn't have a physical form and doesn't exist nor not exist in the first place. Thus every angel is unable to be erased or affected by anything less than an angel,"

Would this be a possible qualification for Paraconsistent Physiology?

 

[I'm_here_to_teach]

The narrative states and I quote "As for regular angels, they are also unique in their existence as every single angel exists but also doesn't exist, they don't exist but also exist, they are nothing but they are still something, same thing goes for us Arc Angels just to a higher degree.


Essentially every single angel is a being that doesn't have a physical form and doesn't exist nor not exist in the first place. Thus every angel is unable to be erased or affected by anything less than an angel,"

Would this be a possible qualification for Paraconsistent Physiology?

Probably not enough but if its doesnt exist in the context of nep, and yet also has existence shown to negate each other ya its being both states at the same time true and false

 

[Tyrone_Dawson]

Probably not enough but if its doesnt exist in the context of nep, and yet also has existence shown to negate each other ya its being both states at the same time true and false

So it would probably only be NEP as a plural existance?

 

[I'm_here_to_teach]

So it would probably only be NEP as a plural existance?

Its probably nep type 3 which i would personally argue ties into pp type 2 since their basically the same thing.

 

[Tyrone_Dawson]

Its probably nep type 3 which i would personally argue ties into pp type 2 since their basically the same thing.

Alright.