• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Does false R>F need significant size?

Mbpoops

Mbpoops

He/Him
Messages
8,474
Reaction score
7,681
As the title says.

If beings in a dimension have false R>F over a lower dimension does the dimension need to be universal/infinite in size to qualify them for higher tiering
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R>F transcendence
Replies
4
Views
746
Reiner04
Reiner04
Helios776
Question about R>F transcendence
Replies
1
Views
824
Ciel_Trinity439
Ciel_Trinity439
Thanganimator
  • Locked
False R>F
2 3
Replies
98
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Hellformer
Regarding significant size of spatial dimensions [Staff opinion needed]
Replies
2
Views
587
KLOL506
KLOL506
Uradial50
The Confusion with R>F and Transcendance?
Replies
4
Views
860
Thanganimator
Thanganimator
Back
Top