• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

It's not on me to take the descision all alone. I’d appreciate hearing the perspective of a few other staff members as well before moving forward.
Jinx666 said:
So essentially: Move all the info of the BC page to the BB page as its own separate section, change the redirect, and then delete the BC page. Easily compacted
Click to expand...
This was my initial proposal too.
 
BreezeHM said:
May I ask why you want them deleted?
Click to expand...
Deeply sorry for late response, was busy.

Because I'm going to replace them all with better versions with more quality. And I don't want any Content Mods to bear the burden of having to save all the images and then uploading them, and jumble their computer with all those images. It's much better to delete those and I'll readd them myself.

I deeply insist. Actually everything under letter M, P and S
 
Apotheosis69 said:
Deeply sorry for late response, was busy.

Because I'm going to replace them all with better versions with more quality. And I don't want any Content Mods to bear the burden of having to save all the images and then uploading them, and jumble their computer with all those images. It's much better to delete those and I'll readd them myself.

I deeply insist. Actually everything under letter M, P and S
Click to expand...
We can always upload a better version of the image with the same name. All you have to do is request in Image addition req thread with the image.
 
Were any of those images used/linked to in our current wiki pages? If so, they should not have been deleted. 🙏
 
Jinx666 said:


Here are two actual web series characters who dont pass the notability requirements as well as their pages being numerously flawed and incomplete in ways (Like not having the correct tier with their AP). Made in 2022 so not an old profile btw

(Category page too: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Nate's_Mysteries)
Click to expand...
Bump

This verse is actually against the notability requirements guys?
 
Antvasima said:
Were any of those images used/linked to in our current wiki pages? If so, they should not have been deleted. 🙏
Click to expand...
Nah, I've checked all the images before deleting. None of them were linked to any mainspace article. Only some of them were linked to Just sandboxes.
 
Last edited:
Jinx666 said:


Here are two actual web series characters who dont pass the notability requirements as well as their pages being numerously flawed and incomplete in ways (Like not having the correct tier with their AP). Made in 2022 so not an old profile btw

(Category page too: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Nate's_Mysteries)
Click to expand...
Bump x2

Is this controversial or smthn?
 
Jinx666 said:
Bump x3

why is it being ignored??? This is quite literally WAY off the sites' notability rules
Click to expand...
There's no need to be that way. It's probably because the notability requirements still aren't fully decided upon, but yeah, this looks obscure.
  • Total view count of 10.1K
  • Divided among 42 videos, an average of 240.6 views per video
  • 153 subscribers
  • Highest view count on a single video is 1.1K
  • Web search I just did found a bare bones IMDB entry with an Instagram account linked as the official site, and a TikTok that didn't seem to work anymore
Based on what I can tell I'd say this does not satisfy even the most lenient possible notability requirements, but best to see what others think.
 
Random-Helper323 said:
There's no need to be that way. It's probably because the notability requirements still aren't fully decided upon, but yeah, this looks obscure.
  • Total view count of 10.1K
  • Divided among 42 videos, an average of 240.6 views per video
  • 153 subscribers
  • Highest view count on a single video is 1.1K
  • Web search I just did found a bare bones IMDB entry with an Instagram account linked as the official site, and a TikTok that didn't seem to work anymore
Based on what I can tell I'd say this does not satisfy even the most lenient possible notability requirements, but best to see what others think.
Click to expand...
I mean it is when its directly being ignored for days on end. This is beyond just an outdated old page (and even then these pages are far more detailed than the ones i prior report). This is also part of the whole problem i've got, yet CRTs are expected to take years to get fulfilled over mundane self-evident stuff. Heres me actually reporting pages that are against the rules and its obviously not getting read.
The original notability requirements dont even allow these sorts of pages (which the current discussions are about how they arent strict enough) so what exactly is the deal?
 
Ztesrxgdfjcvgkbh said:
Is this bad enough for deletion?
Click to expand...
I've moved it to the user's sandbox due to lacking justifications, scans and references in the P & A. Once that's done they can reupload it.
Jinx666 said:
Click to expand...
I don't see a problem with the profile. It is bare, but the P & A link to a physiology page, it has scans and references, and proper justifications.
 
Rogue_Forge said:
It needs some work but is overall fine

However as a massive fan of Invincible I think it should wait till season 4 calcs are accepted before making Thraggs profile (Just my opinion)
Click to expand...
Pretty sure the entire discussion thread would back you up on that
 
Tahoy49574 said:
Also delete this one while at it. He's only got one appearance and lacks any of the statements and scaling to other characters his Comic counterpart has. Why does it even have a "likely far higher" ?
Click to expand...
This profile has been around for quite some time, though there are a couple problems with it.

  • No scans or references
  • Incorrect use of far higher
  • No Type and justification for Regeneration
  • Stamina lacks a justification
  • Extraordinary Genius lacks a justification.
The only thing keeping this profile from being deleted would be that it links to Invincible for its statistics. So I'm in agreement.
 
BreezeHM said:
The Door Lord definitely needs to go.

As for Nate Williams, it should be fine to stay, as I'm not seeing any major violations.
Click to expand...
...The entire verse itself is from an internet series that has barely cracked 100+ views on youtube, Clearly against the notability requirements.
 
Jinx666 said:
...The entire verse itself is from an internet series that has barely cracked 100+ views on youtube, Clearly against the notability requirements.
Click to expand...
Yeah I did some research around it. Definitely doesn't meet our standards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DarkDragonMedeus
Standardization of Tabber Image Formatting
Replies
12
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Jinx666
'Affiliations' addition (optional) to Character pages
Replies
20
Views
2K
Jinx666
Jinx666
Agnaa
Standard Format - Statistics Section Tabbers
Replies
19
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Just a Random Butler
  • Locked
Proposed Quality of Life Change to the Discussions Template
Replies
31
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Poiesis_Element
Mortal Shell Verse Creation
Replies
20
Views
2K
Poiesis_Element
Poiesis_Element
Back
Top