This has to be one of the worst responses I've ever gotten in my life...
Baryon Mode still has its own danger sense which could detect projectiles even a combination of an enhanced sage mode and kcm2 couldn't with extreme precision.
Where is "enhanced precognition" listed in the profile for the Baryon Mode key?
Nowhere.
So we're done here.
You don't get to invent abilities mid-debate that aren't catalogued on the profile we're working from.
End of STORY. Baryon Mode doesn't have danger sense.
If it's not on the page, it doesn't exist for the purposes of this matchup. That's the most basic rule of VS debating and you just casually threw it out because you needed a lifeline.
Next.
Kid Naruto anti-feats brought up for hokage Naruto is crazy.
I already addressed this. It was
Karo who brought up Kid Naruto, not me. I was pointing out the absurdity of
their argument. The fact that you responded to me as if I made that argument tells me you didn't actually read my post carefully. Which explains a lot about the quality of your responses.
Kcm1 Naruto throws hands with Itachi and keeps up with him with no difficulty.
KCM1 Naruto
outstats Itachi. You just proved my point for me. Naruto keeping up with a slower opponent is not a skill feat. That is a
stat feat. Thank you for demonstrating exactly the problem with your argumentation, you're consistently repackaging power advantages as technical skill and hoping nobody notices.
Then with sage mode Naruto eventually manages to precog-pinpoint Obito who not only has sharingan precog but also his own sage mode on top of it.
"Eventually." Your word, not mine. After extended combat, with Sage Mode active, against an opponent whose primary advantage is
intangibility, not raw combat skill. And Sage Mode is
not available in this matchup, which you conveniently keep glossing over every single time you bring up Sage-enhanced feats. Stop citing tools Naruto doesn't have access to.
We also see Kinshiki can keep up with Sasuke's sharingan precog and Momoshiki can do so 2v1. And yet Naruto could throw hands on par with Momoshiki.
This is a
power scaling chain, not a skill argument. You're saying:
- Kinshiki kept up with Sasuke's Sharingan
- Momoshiki absorbed Kinshiki
- Naruto matched Momoshiki
That's
three layers of transitive stat scaling dressed up as a skill feat. None of that tells us anything about Naruto's actual martial technique, his analytical mid-fight adaptation, or his ability to read and counter a fighting style he's never seen. By your own logic, every character who outstats a Sharingan user is a martial arts genius. That's not how this works.
Also, it's
REALLY PRECIOUS how you keep asking for feats and ignoring statements while at the same time citing, "Naruto kept up with guy that had this".
If the Sharingan user didn't use his precog effectively and was countered by a freaking kick to the face, that's either a blitz, or the Sharingan user is a terrible fighter.
"Keeping up" with someone that has a certain skill is MEANINGLESS if the method used isn't particular impressive.
Cool but potential does not equal skill.
You quoted one sentence and responded to it in complete isolation, which I already called out as an
extremely dishonest debating practice. The Kamehameha replication is not a standalone claim, it is
evidence of his learning speed and combat IQ, which is then supported by every subsequent feat in the chain. The fact that Goku
fulfills that potential by forcing Roshi to his absolute limit, then defeating Tao Pai Pai, then dismantling Tenshinhan with surgical precision, that is the argument. You don't get to snipe one brick out of a wall and declare the wall doesn't exist.
Don't just throw the word "literal" around when your scan does in fact NOT say that literally.
The title "God of Martial Arts" being bestowed at the Tenka'ichi Budōkai,
the premier martial arts tournament in the world, on a man described as a master of
every known martial arts style in existence is, by any reasonable reading, a claim of absolute supremacy over human martial arts. The word "literal" is rhetorical emphasis, not a citation error. You know this. You're nitpicking punctuation because you have no substantive counter to the actual claim.
And by the way,
you said you read that far into Dragon Ball. Did you?
No, cause did you
really?
Because someone who actually read it wouldn't dismiss the Tenka'ichi Budōkai framing as "unimpressive in context." The tournament is explicitly presented as the pinnacle of martial arts in that world. That's not my interpretation. That's the text.
Not impressive without showing impressive Roshi feats from that point in the story.
Being
superior to every martial artist in the world is the feat. You don't need a secondary source to validate a statement that is itself a statement of absolute supremacy. If someone is explicitly called the best in the world at something, the burden is on
you to prove that's an empty title, not on me to re-prove the obvious.
Furthermore, Goku matching and pushing Roshi to his limit
at relative stats means the delta came entirely from technical skill. You haven't engaged with this once. You just keep saying "not impressive" as if saying it enough times makes it true. It doesn't. Use your words.
Pretty standard martial arts stuff ngl.
Let me restate exactly what happened so you can't summarize it into oblivion:
- Goku preemptively grabbed Roshi's glasses before the Solar Flare was even executed, not as a reaction, but as a prediction of Tenshinhan's intent
- He read through the Zanzōken in real time and identified it as a bluff while moving at combat speed
- He recognized mid-fight that a Kamehameha would be an energy inefficient play in that specific moment and repurposed it as a propulsion tool to create a different attack vector
- All of this happened at equal stats, meaning every single advantage came from intelligence and technique alone
"Standard stuff." That's your response. You are either being deliberately obtuse or you genuinely cannot recognize what you're looking at.
Naruto predicted Kakuzu's prediction.
This is your best Naruto skill feat and I'll give it genuine credit, it
is good misdirection. But notice what you're doing: you're holding up
one highlight moment as representative of Naruto's general combat IQ, while systematically dismissing an
entire documented history of Goku's technical development across multiple arcs and multiple opponents. That is not a consistent standard of evidence. Either both sides cite specific moments as representative or neither does.
And even granting the Kakuzu feat fully, Goku didn't just predict one layer of prediction. He repurposed the Kamehameha, invented a new martial style mid-fight, preemptively countered a technique before it was used, and did all of this against opponents explicitly described as his peers or superiors in skill. The depth and
consistency of his analytical application across completely different opponents, styles, and scenarios dwarfs a single clever clone trick.
Naruto attacked Kaguya once and immediately had completely analyzed her fighting style.
No. He did not. I'm going to say this plainly:
Naruto did not analyze Kaguya's fighting style and develop a counter.
He came up with a distraction plan. That is
literally what happened. You described it as "completely analyzing her fighting style and how to counter it", that is a fabrication. You inflated a basic misdirection tactic into something it demonstrably was not, and you did it in a debate about analytical prediction. The irony is almost poetic.
That's not a martial art feat but an energy manipulation feat.
Goku learning to suppress his
entire life signature to absolute zero, no heat, no sound, no ki, no breathing detectable, at God-tier power levels, through dedicated mastery under the tutelage of beings above Kami-sama, is being compared by you to... academy children not making footstep sounds.
I want you to sit with that.
You compared the complete erasure of a divine energy signature to children learning to walk quietly.
That is the quality of argument you just submitted.
Frog Kata was described to be flawless in defense AND offense. So sub-PA Naruto level stuff here.
Goku's guard being impenetrable is established
independently of power scaling. An impenetrable guard means no openings, that is a technical mastery descriptor, not a power level descriptor. You can't dismiss a
technique quality statement by citing a power tier. These are different categories. Frog Kata being "flawless" is also a description that exists within Naruto's power context. Goku's impenetrable guard exists within his. You cannot casually cross-reference them as equivalent without arguing why they're comparable in scope, which you haven't done.
The only difference is he used touch instead of sight. Hell it might even be worse.
You genuinely tried to argue that sensing attacks through
microscopic air current shifts is
worse than visual prediction.
Think about what you just said.
Visual prediction requires a visible tell. Air current sensing requires detecting
the physical displacement caused by motion at combat speeds, pressure waves, directional flow, velocity gradient, and processing all of that into an accurate read of angle, speed, and trajectory.
Without seeing anything.
That is a higher-order sensory feat than visual reaction time. Not lower. The fact that you tried to spin it as a downplay tells me you recognized it was a problem for your argument and just hoped the framing would stick.
It didn't.
This is vaguely impressive but without actual feats to show how it changes his combat it doesn't amount to much.
King Kai, ranked
above Kami-sama in martial arts mastery, staking his reputation on Goku's potential, predicting he would become the greatest warrior in the
universe, and being
correct... "doesn't amount to much."
A prophecy made by a being of that caliber,
fulfilled canonically, is exactly the kind of statement that establishes Goku's ceiling. You want feats to show how training changed his combat? The entire remainder of the Z saga
is those feats. You don't get to demand more evidence for a premise that the entire rest of the story confirms.
Also base BoS Sasuke could take down 1000 shinobi. So Naruto edges out in numbers.
You just used this exact logic "
100 Z Warriors can't compare to his power" to dismiss my Piccolo feat as a power statement rather than a skill feat.
And then
in the same response you cited Sasuke defeating 1000 shinobi as a comparative numbers argument.
You applied one standard to Goku and the opposite standard to Naruto in
consecutive sentences.
Anyway if you want me to I can break Naruto's skill down for you.
Yes. Please do. Because so far your entire counter-argument has consisted of:
- "Not impressive" with no supporting reasoning
- One Kakuzu feat
- Power scaling chains mislabeled as skill feats
- A double standard applied selectively to whatever benefits Naruto
- A fabricated description of the Kaguya fight
- Comparing divine Ki suppression to children walking quietly
- Arguing that touch-based prediction is worse than visual prediction
Break it down. I'm right here. I have sources, I have patience, and I have already demonstrated that every single technical category favors Goku with
documented, cited evidence.
Your move. Have an actual point. I love how you ignored the fact Goku can also double his stats anyway to overwhelm Naruto, lmao.