- 21,510
- 36,029
Its fine yeah
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Expanding the References for Common Feats page
- Thread starter JPTheGamer
- Start date
- 177,358
- 90,216
Thank you. That can probably be added then.
Is somebody willing to add all of the following feats to our References for Common Feats page in a properly structured manner please? Or are any of them inappropriate?
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7447503
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7466319
Is somebody willing to add all of the following feats to our References for Common Feats page in a properly structured manner please? Or are any of them inappropriate?
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7447503
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7466319
StarShooter80
He/Him- 6,053
- 4,897
Credits to Oiguana2701, this is all by them:
Shaking the sun
I'll be using the same method used in the original shaking the Earth calculation.
Assuming the standard magnitude of 4: (4) + 6.399 + 1.66*log10((2185003/110)((2Ď€)/360)) = 14.615295
Energy: 10^(1.5*(14.615295)+4.8) = 5.28375291e26 Joules, or 126.2847253625067 Petatons. High 6-A
Is this fine? Or are there other better ways to calculate sun shaking feats?
Shaking the sun
I'll be using the same method used in the original shaking the Earth calculation.
Assuming the standard magnitude of 4: (4) + 6.399 + 1.66*log10((2185003/110)((2Ď€)/360)) = 14.615295
Energy: 10^(1.5*(14.615295)+4.8) = 5.28375291e26 Joules, or 126.2847253625067 Petatons. High 6-A
Is this fine? Or are there other better ways to calculate sun shaking feats?
Breadbear83
He/Him- 783
- 489
Theres a little mistake on the reference of common feats with the values it uses, I say them in this short thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/refer...r-snails-when-it-should-have-only-one.188063/
- 2,979
- 1,983
- Thread starter
- #1,526
Aren't they just the low and high ends of a snail?
Breadbear83
He/Him- 783
- 489
From what I see in the calculations page: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Calculations#Slow_Motion_Calculations
Top speed of snails is 0.00275 m/s, going at slow as 0.001625 but it also says "some studies find then around 0.0024 m/s"
Even thought I have seen most people use 0.00275 m/s ends for slow mo calcs, the calculations page gives those 3 possible ends
So maybe those 2 feat references could use the 3 different ends of snail speeds for the calc, or both could use the mid end of snails going at 0.0024 m/s for the results
- 177,358
- 90,216
@DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @Therefir @Damage3245Thank you. That can probably be added then.
Is somebody willing to add all of the following feats to our References for Common Feats page in a properly structured manner please? Or are any of them inappropriate?
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7447503
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7466319
- 177,358
- 90,216
- 2,603
- 5,156
So, I take it that it's completely fine for me to go ahead and add those to the page?Thank you. That can probably be added then.
Is somebody willing to add all of the following feats to our References for Common Feats page in a properly structured manner please? Or are any of them inappropriate?
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7447503
https://vsbattles.com/threads/expanding-the-references-for-common-feats-page.128358/post-7466319
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,412
- 1,418
I think this would be a good addition if evaluated
Covers the GBE of the average moon, both elliptical and non-elliptical. Applicable for when feats/statements are about moons other than earth's
Covers the GBE of the average moon, both elliptical and non-elliptical. Applicable for when feats/statements are about moons other than earth's
- 177,358
- 90,216
Has this been handled already?Yes. It would be really great and appreciated if you do so in a properly structured manner.
- 226
- 51
Doesn't look like anything's been addedHas this been handled already?
- 2,603
- 5,156
I have it prepared here:Has this been handled already?
Are these changes okay?
For this one, I have renamed Miscellaneous Feats to just Miscellaneous.
I have also renamed Creating or destroying a pocket realm to just Pocket Realm Feats.
If the changes are good, I can apply the changes to the actual page.
Here are the changes:
Surprised no one did this one before, but I wish to submit this one:
Common feat: Destroying the Eiffel Tower
vsbattles.fandom.com
Destroying a submarine -> Object Destruction FeatsThere's this one too:
Destroying a submarine
Destroying the Eiffel Tower -> Object Destruction Feats
Covering the World in Clouds -> Weather FeatsWould like to add these please:
Covering the world in clouds
Covering the world in smoke
Covering the World in Smoke -> Miscellaneous
I renamed "Creating or destroying a pocket realm" header to just "Pocket Realm Feats" in the sandbox.Totally forgot I had this so I thought it should be submitted.
Shaking Pocket Dimensions containing Various Celestial Bodies
While it was made for feats of shaking entire pocket dimensions of limited size, I believe it could also be used for shaking feats in a normal universe that extend to a given distance (ie the moon, the sun, etc).
Then I did this:
Shaking pocket dimensions containing various celestial bodies -> Pocket Realm Feats
In here it states that we can get AP from tearing off heads, but is there a calc for that?
The question of the priority of LS and AP in battles
I had a question about how the LS advantage works and in what cases it allows one to gain the upper hand over a stronger opponent, and in what cases it doesn't. LS usually determined whether one character could immobilize another. However, I recently learned that a 10-Kilton character with LS...vsbattles.com
For the Ripping off heads, it has two sections now: Attack Potency and Lifting Strength.
A page for reference of common feats by Jasonsith
I added this on Miscellaneous, but I am not sure if it's the most appropriate section for it.
- 226
- 51
I think you might have missed this one; this was already agreed to be addedI'm surprised this hasn't been added to the page. Don't know if anyone's already put it forwards, but would putting this calculation on be alright? It's for pulverising a human being.
Worm Calc: Gavel splatters people
It's been accepted for a while and seems simple enough
- 2,603
- 5,156
I renamed the "Crushing Feats" section to "Crushing and Pulverization Feats" and then added the calculation in question:
Would this be an appropriate change?
- 2,603
- 5,156
If there are no further changes to be made here:
Then I can go ahead and apply the sandbox to the actual page now, right?
Then I can go ahead and apply the sandbox to the actual page now, right?
- 2,603
- 5,156
Okay, I have applied the changes.
- 2,979
- 1,983
- Thread starter
- #1,544
Nicely done, Butler.Thank you greatly.
While we're at it, may I suggest we remove any strike-through text as well as the Digging up from the Underground section since it was rejected sometime back?
- 2,979
- 1,983
- Thread starter
- #1,545
Also would like to notify everyone that I borrowed the information from Necrozma's feat of absorbing all the light from the universe and put it into a blog. May I get some evaluations, please?
- 177,358
- 90,216
- 2,603
- 5,156
I can remove the Digging up header, but there are likely still pages linking to that specific section, so please edit those out if you come across them.
As for the strikethrough text, I was already planning to remove first-person pronouns across the page, as well as references like this blog, to reduce the informal tone of the majority of the text.
However, this will not be finished today, or anytime soon, as the page is very large in size.
Oiguana2701
He/Him- 2,509
- 1,598
What should we do for pages that depend on that? Should we just leave the text without the calculation?
- 2,603
- 5,156
I think if we come across any, we can remove the link while keeping the text since they would essentially be defunct, then contact the supporters and knowledgeable members to see if there are any alternative approaches that can be taken.
Or maybe also contact some Calculation Group Members that are possibly willing to help with it?
I am not quite sure.
- 2,603
- 5,156
I have removed that specific section header from the page.
ThePrimalHunter
He/Him- 4,390
- 1,910
This calculation needs approval, but if it works it can be added to the References For Common Feats Page
- 104
- 38
It is too simplified.
Oiguana2701
He/Him- 2,509
- 1,598
Then what should be done instead?
ThePrimalHunter
He/Him- 4,390
- 1,910
How so?
- 104
- 38
There is too little for it to be accurate. You're using tensile strength which is good. But a torso is not a hollow cylinder, but I am not good at biology so I cannot suggest a replacement. You only used muscle tensile strength but forgot skin, bones (the spine), and more.
Force = Area x Tensile strength is wrong. Tensile strength makes sense, it is good to use here, but you are misapplying the idea of tensile strength. Tensile strength experiments are for uniformly, same density, objects, not for such a complex object such as this.
This is a very low number and we need to fix it.
- 2,979
- 1,983
- Thread starter
- #1,557
I suppose we should ping some calculation group members for this.
Ant, would you do the honors, please?Thanks a massive lot for all of your help here, Butler.
Oiguana2701
He/Him- 2,509
- 1,598
Would one of those be better in your opinion?
Neon White: Calculations Any%run
vsbattles.fandom.com
Lee rips a walker in half
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 2,603
- 5,156
That user will not be able to respond to this.Would one of those be better in your opinion?
Neon White: Calculations Any%run
Lee rips a walker in half
Oiguana2701
He/Him- 2,509
- 1,598
Were they banned?
Either way, I think this specific feat (ripping someone in half) needs a whole calc group discussion thread, as I've seen several different calculations with each getting a different result.
Similar threads
