• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Honkai: Star Rail Discussion Thread

yaoi guang
IMG-8018.jpg
 
Oh yea @Mbpoops when you make the thread to remove possibly High 1-C, I can write you a section on this myself



Its been on the loading screen all along brochacho ✌️
The terminology realspace in the game and physical plane (where is what the Aeons scale to) are used differently per the images below actually:
7042b73c7aab203141d9569d0377f3ab-2.jpg

WQve-MOM.jpg

And considering that one Sirin databook where they explained in Second Eruption that Real Space is strictly 3 dimensional of space and 1 dimensional of time, which would mean again the "higher-dimensional" stuff here is either 5-D or 11-D as it strictly cannot be 4 dimensional and arguing Real Space in HI3 and HSR are different just because HSR mentioned 3-dimensional is not something I would choose generally LOL, I mean dude even if it's the Sea of Quanta, it cannot be 3-D or 4-D when we have a literal statement about this. But yeah my question is that would we trust The Enigmata? Considering that note could've been made by anyone (History Fictionologist)
 
The terminology realspace in the game and physical plane (where is what the Aeons scale to) are used differently per the images below actually:
How?

And considering that one Sirin databook where they explained in Second Eruption that Real Space is strictly 3 dimensional of space and 1 dimensional of time, which would mean again the "higher-dimensional" stuff here is either 5-D or 11-D as it strictly cannot be 4 dimensional and arguing Real Space in HI3 and HSR are different just because HSR mentioned 3-dimensional is not something I would choose generally LOL
Who the **** is saying realspace is different inbetween games what.
 
Jesus christ man, how are you so far back? This was resolved threads ago
Which thread cause I'd like to disagree with that, the fact they used different terms on explaining realspace and physical plane implies the former is not the totality unlike the latter
 
The terminology realspace in the game and physical plane (where is what the Aeons scale to) are used differently per the images below actually:
7042b73c7aab203141d9569d0377f3ab-2.jpg

WQve-MOM.jpg
thats just... blatantly incorrect...

in your screenshots march literally says the physical plane and entire universe in the same paragraph meaning she is refering to the universe

the scans that nova sent directly refer to real space (3D space) as the universe

they both mean universe along with the word "reality"
And considering that one Sirin databook where they explained in Second Eruption that Real Space is strictly 3 dimensional of space and 1 dimensional of time, which would mean again the "higher-dimensional" stuff here is either 5-D or 11-D as it strictly cannot be 4 dimensional and arguing Real Space in HI3 and HSR are different just because HSR mentioned 3-dimensional is not something I would choose generally LOL, I mean dude even if it's the Sea of Quanta, it cannot be 3-D or 4-D when we have a literal statement about this. But yeah my question is that would we trust The Enigmata? Considering that note could've been made by anyone (History Fictionologist)
what the hell are you talking about?

most people only refer to the space aspect when talking about higher dimensional spaces so obviously when we include time its gonna be 4-D but the universe SPATIALLY is 3D.

the stuff here can very well be 4 dimensional in space, however we know the text is directly refering to the SoQ which is 11 dimensional lol
 
Which thread cause I'd like to disagree with that, the fact they used different terms on explaining realspace and physical plane implies the former is not the totality unlike the latter
Actually. Open a thread on this so you can be embarrassed there, I'm not bothering with it here.
 
Why is dahlia’s profile talked about like it’s this mythical thing that’s always slightly out of reach how long has it been worked on for?😭
enryu left a bit after the cosmology got nuked and cas wanted me to finish the dahlia im just not a big fan of her so im not motivated to do it, cas said he'd do it but then forced himself to do 8 threads so he doesnt have to work on it
 
usually, at least from what ive seen/read, scientists only refer to the spatial aspects and not the temporal when talking about higher dimensions compared to ours i could be wrong though cause i know some refer to the temporality but eh
 
Actually. Open a thread on this so you can be embarrassed there, I'm not bothering with it here.
Yeah so it was never established they were the same thing, good lord.
thats just... blatantly incorrect...

in your screenshots march literally says the physical plane and entire universe in the same paragraph meaning she is refering to the universe

the scans that nova sent directly refer to real space (3D space) as the universe

they both mean universe along with the word "reality"

what the hell are you talking about?

most people only refer to the space aspect when talking about higher dimensional spaces so obviously when we include time its gonna be 4-D but the universe SPATIALLY is 3D.

the stuff here can very well be 4 dimensional in space, however we know the text is directly refering to the SoQ which is 11 dimensional lol
Yeah but that doesn't mean it's capped to 3 dimensional when we explicitly knows that it includes time, and by default 2-A structures. Like I thought we all agreed High 1-C is through the scans Weaver sent that Aeons could rupture the imaginary or something like that, which is kinda the reason why Sirin's also High 1-C according to Viet, idk how yall thought destroying the universe is possibly High 1-C
 
Yeah so it was never established they were the same thing, good lord.

Yeah but that doesn't mean it's capped to 3 dimensional
no one is capping it at 3D the scan just doesnt reference the universe's temporal dimension
when we explicitly knows that it includes time, and by default 2-A structures.
it is the 2-A structure it doesnt contain 2-A structures
Like I thought we all agreed High 1-C is through the scans Weaver sent that Aeons could rupture the imaginary or something like that, which is kinda the reason why Sirin's also High 1-C according to Viet, idk how yall thought destroying the universe is possibly High 1-C
no... we actually almost lost H1-C for the entire verse because of those scans weaver sent... go read the thread everyone was contending him... and for the sirin stuff we know vietthai is just being lenient most people here know that possibly high 1-C makes no sense with the cosmology
 
no one is capping it at 3D the scan just doesnt reference the universe's temporal dimension

it is the 2-A structure it doesnt contain 2-A structures

no... we actually almost lost H1-C for the entire verse because of those scans weaver sent... go read the thread everyone was contending him... and for the sirin stuff we know vietthai is just being lenient most people here know that possibly high 1-C makes no sense with the cosmology
Yeah so my point is that I thought shit was established that the physical plane is 2-A, and Aeons are possibly High 1-C cause they're capable of rupturing the imaginary and not through destroying the physical plane
 
Yeah so my point is that I thought shit was established that the physical plane is 2-A, and Aeons are possibly High 1-C cause they're capabe of rupturing the imaginary and not through destroying the physical plane
no not at all lol aeons are only possibly because weaver posited that the universe is the same imaginary tree as Hi3 which is just blatantly wrong but oh well
 
no not at all lol aeons are only possibly because weaver posited that the universe is the same imaginary tree as Hi3 which is just blatantly wrong but oh well
Is it possible to just change the justifications cause Aeons are capable of rupturing the imaginary?
 
no because thats not a high 1-C feat we went over this in the staff crt. unless you want base welt to be high 1-C because he did the exact same thing with the soq
How's that not a High 1-C feat when we have Viet agreeing to Sirin being High 1-C
 
btw since like IE and HE are blatantly the same thing (SW literally sayys "this is honkai") what do we think the heiarchy is?

emanator/herrscher - herrscher level (prolly gotta rename it atp also this one varies drastically IMO)
stellaron mfs, cornerstone, possilby masked fools - high level
coreflames/pathstriders - low level
everyone else is baseline
 
someone told me she wasnt an emanator with the arbor cause she wasnt in her real body. either way this just straight up nukes any emantor chainscale lol especially with fu hua soloing evanescia
i said this and then nova did too... the point was that it wasnt her real body housing her emanator powers since she says "body stolen on a whim".
 
Back
Top