• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Bondin' Jimmy (2-A Mario Bonds UES CRT)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Look at the video for once. When he says create ideal world he obviously means turn this world into one he likes more do you know what media literacy is.
He doesn't give a damn about each world. He's meant to be like a petulant child. He boasts about building the world, and then breaking it. He tells the Bros this multiple times.

Man on The Internet put it best:

"What a wonderful world I make"
"But it's so much more fun to break!"
yeah and somehow three people misinterpreted it.
More than three people. You didn't even play the damn game. Don't get snarky with me.

I can only humor so much from someone who is asking ME for information on a game they never played.
 
He did say he played the game, he just doesn't have a complete memory of the various caveats and specifics.
Where did he say this? Did he beat it? 100%?

And is he knowledgeable enough on it to be talking to me, someone who has done both and researched the game for two years, about misinterpretations?

Ask questions, but BE FOR REAL about talking to me about misinterpretations about a game you, at the very least FORGOT ABOUT...
 
More than three people. You didn't even play the damn game. Don't get snarky with me.

I can only humor so much from someone who is asking ME for information on a game they never played.
Where did he say this? Did he beat it? 100%?

And is he knowledgeable enough on it to be talking to me, someone who has done both and researched the game for two years, about misinterpretations?

Ask questions, but BE FOR REAL about talking to me about misinterpretations about a game you, at the very least FORGOT ABOUT...
@Galactidot, this kind of attitude isn't necessary; I know @Lou_change might be getting on your nerves here, but it doesn't mean you have to get onto him for his knowledge on the game.

Please, keep it civil here; we don't want or need any incidents that happened in the previous threads.
 
I used your scans to relearn and watched other people play it. I did all side quests, got all the plugs, grampy turnips, rare reefs, beat the game, and then deleted the only save slot I used for the game after I saved during the postgame. The only things I think I didn't do was collect all beans and reach 100 points in the ball game.
 
I used your scans to relearn and watched other people play it. I did all side quests, got all the plugs, grampy turnips, rare reefs, beat the game, and then deleted the only save slot I used for the game after I saved during the postgame. The only things I think I didn't do was collect all beans and reach 100 points in the ball game.
Alright. Thank you for answering the question

Why did you delete your save though, that's kinda random 💀

But just... Don't accuse me of misinterpreting the game and lacking media literacy. Please?
 
Alright. Thank you for answering the question

Why did you delete your save though, that's kinda random 💀

But just... Don't accuse me of misinterpreting the game and lacking media literacy. Please?
(I thought you couldn't leave the boat after beating Reclusa which meant there's nothing to really do and the file may as well be softlocked)
Sorry
 
Have the debates over the last 2 pages changed any propositions or stances?
Well, here's my two cents...
Alright, I'm gonna reiterate my replies since I feel like a lot's being slept on...

Within one of Dr. Vulko's notes, it's strongly implied that Connectar, which is the primary energy source of Concordia holds "limitless power", and later states the Bonds of family, friendship and love produce Connectar along with the Uni-Tree. Per the Tiering System FAQ, infinite power of one thing is generally described to be High 3-A. The Bonds are also stated to transcend the world, and everything exists precisely because everything in the world is born from the energy of the Bonds due to one's 'connections' with someone. The entire Super Mario Cosmology is currently 2-A, and affecting one to infinite 4-dimensional spacetime continuums is well within the Tier 2 range. By this logic, it should mean:
  • The Uni-Tree and the Bonds are at the very least High Universe level seeing as how they're producing Concordia with limitless power
  • The Bonds transcending the world and everything in the world existing because of the Bonds places them at Universe level+ to Multiverse level+
The OP is right on Bonds meeting criteria from the Universal Energy Systems...

...and it fits even more criteria which was posted later on in this thread. To correctly reiterate the third qualification in this part the OP listed, as I stated before in my previous post here, the UES page says:

This section of the page clearly tells us visual evidence of amplification isn't considered necessary; just that they have to demonstrate that they can channel their power through their own bodies in a way that quantifiably enhances them or otherwise allows scaling of their supernatural powers through their physicals, and there should be evidence that an increase in power / energy should correspond to a proportional increase in the potency of their physical statistics. The blog and the OP listed a few instances of the Bonds being used to enhance others and allow users to channel that power through their bodies:
All these instances meet that part of the UES standards of the page; furthermore, DDM stated another rule from the page in this reply:

This is proven when the Mario Bros beat Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla because when the Glohm leaves them upon their defeat, they revert back into their base forms and statistics while unconscious; not to mention the Bros are battling them with and WITHOUT the Bonds. With all these indicators combined, this must prove THE BONDS ACT AS A UES; even if it doesn't, the evidence of them acting as a stat amp is so blatant it's hard to ignore and not place on the profiles.

The "eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse" part is lacking context; the full statement from Shun is actually this:
Everyone carries some Glohm with them. Dark feelings... Loneliness... Disconnectedness... Reclusa's a monster that turns lonely feelings into energy. And he's been around since long before any of us were born. He hatches from an egg and fills the world with loneliness... When his power is up, he recharges in his egg. If we don't stop him... he'll keep doing that, again, and again.
But this DOESN'T mean Reclusa DOESN'T scale to the Bonds or his dream manipulation; in fact, Reclusa implied he previously broke everyone's connections in many other worlds and all that awaited them was a slow demise. The Glohm is the exact same substance Reclusa used to make the dreams, and it's also the same substance that was used to empower characters like Bowser and Gorumbla, whom Mario and Luigi defeated. The Soli-Tree is basically a warped, evil, dark version of the Uni-Tree; it was formed by Reclusa after he hatched from his egg when he first encountered the Mario Bros, and mind you, this is the exact same egg he recharges in.

Before anybody states Creation Feats need proof that they scale to physicals, I heavily implore you to watch the fights between Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla; they're shown to use techniques like Glohm-infused punches and shell attacks. Are they displaying explicit Tier 2 feats like universe/multiversal destruction or creation during these fights? Of course not, but this is generally how a lot of pages on this wiki operate:
  • Sonic and Son Goku haven't displayed Low Multiverse destruction on a constant everyday regular basis, yet there's at least one or a few instances of them scaling to characters on these tiers or have displayed one or a few instances of things like shaking the Macrocosm.
  • As someone who's worked on both the Hellboy and Spawn franchises/verses, while characters like Liz Sherman or Satan haven't constantly displayed Low 1-C or 7-B feats, they still sit on those tiers because they've performed the feat at least once.
None of these instances I listed are treated as outliers by the wiki, and we shouldn't be doing the same thing to characters like Mario, Luigi, and Reclusa in this thread. (And honestly, Idc if this is whataboutism because that's not the point).
 
Well, here's my two cents...
Yes, I saw that; It was at the start of page 4; That's why I said "2 pages" here on page 5.
So, based on your repeating of that summary, you would not say none of the knowledgeable members have proposed any changes nor changed any stances in the 2 pages of discussion?
 
Yes, I saw that; It was at the start of page 4; That's why I said "2 pages" here on page 5.
So, based on your repeating of that summary, you would not say none of the knowledgeable members have proposed any changes nor changed any stances in the 2 pages of discussion?
Doesn't seem like it.
 
Alright then. Given the widespread agreement & my trust in Darkdragonmedeus's & FinePoint's judgments, I'll tentatively agree with what they have agreed with so far.
Dalesean and I both disagreed with most of what OP is proposing. You're free to take any position you want but "widespread agreement" is not correct, and not something you should base your thread on.
 
Alright, I'm gonna reiterate my replies since I feel like a lot's being slept on...

Within one of Dr. Vulko's notes, it's strongly implied that Connectar, which is the primary energy source of Concordia holds "limitless power", and later states the Bonds of family, friendship and love produce Connectar along with the Uni-Tree. Per the Tiering System FAQ, infinite power of one thing is generally described to be High 3-A. The Bonds are also stated to transcend the world, and everything exists precisely because everything in the world is born from the energy of the Bonds due to one's 'connections' with someone. The entire Super Mario Cosmology is currently 2-A, and affecting one to infinite 4-dimensional spacetime continuums is well within the Tier 2 range. By this logic, it should mean:
  • The Uni-Tree and the Bonds are at the very least High Universe level seeing as how they're producing Concordia with limitless power
  • The Bonds transcending the world and everything in the world existing because of the Bonds places them at Universe level+ to Multiverse level+
The OP is right on Bonds meeting criteria from the Universal Energy Systems...

...and it fits even more criteria which was posted later on in this thread. To correctly reiterate the third qualification in this part the OP listed, as I stated before in my previous post here, the UES page says:

This section of the page clearly tells us visual evidence of amplification isn't considered necessary; just that they have to demonstrate that they can channel their power through their own bodies in a way that quantifiably enhances them or otherwise allows scaling of their supernatural powers through their physicals, and there should be evidence that an increase in power / energy should correspond to a proportional increase in the potency of their physical statistics. The blog and the OP listed a few instances of the Bonds being used to enhance others and allow users to channel that power through their bodies:
All these instances meet that part of the UES standards of the page; furthermore, DDM stated another rule from the page in this reply:

This is proven when the Mario Bros beat Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla because when the Glohm leaves them upon their defeat, they revert back into their base forms and statistics while unconscious; not to mention the Bros are battling them with and WITHOUT the Bonds. With all these indicators combined, this must prove THE BONDS ACT AS A UES; even if it doesn't, the evidence of them acting as a stat amp is so blatant it's hard to ignore and not place on the profiles.

The "eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse" part is lacking context; the full statement from Shun is actually this:
Everyone carries some Glohm with them. Dark feelings... Loneliness... Disconnectedness... Reclusa's a monster that turns lonely feelings into energy. And he's been around since long before any of us were born. He hatches from an egg and fills the world with loneliness... When his power is up, he recharges in his egg. If we don't stop him... he'll keep doing that, again, and again.
But this DOESN'T mean Reclusa DOESN'T scale to the Bonds or his dream manipulation; in fact, Reclusa implied he previously broke everyone's connections in many other worlds and all that awaited them was a slow demise. The Glohm is the exact same substance Reclusa used to make the dreams, and it's also the same substance that was used to empower characters like Bowser and Gorumbla, whom Mario and Luigi defeated. The Soli-Tree is basically a warped, evil, dark version of the Uni-Tree; it was formed by Reclusa after he hatched from his egg when he first encountered the Mario Bros, and mind you, this is the exact same egg he recharges in.

Before anybody states Creation Feats need proof that they scale to physicals, I heavily implore you to watch the fights between Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla; they're shown to use techniques like Glohm-infused punches and shell attacks. Are they displaying explicit Tier 2 feats like universe/multiversal destruction or creation during these fights? Of course not, but this is generally how a lot of pages on this wiki operate:
  • Sonic and Son Goku haven't displayed Low Multiverse destruction on a constant everyday regular basis, yet there's at least one or a few instances of them scaling to characters on these tiers or have displayed one or a few instances of things like shaking the Macrocosm.
  • As someone who's worked on both the Hellboy and Spawn franchises/verses, while characters like Liz Sherman or Satan haven't constantly displayed Low 1-C or 7-B feats, they still sit on those tiers because they've performed the feat at least once.
None of these instances I listed are treated as outliers by the wiki, and we shouldn't be doing the same thing to characters like Mario, Luigi, and Reclusa in this thread. (And honestly, Idc if this is whataboutism because that's not the point).
 
Alright then. Given the widespread agreement & my trust in Darkdragonmedeus's & FinePoint's judgments, I'll tentatively agree with what they have agreed with so far.
Okay!
As mentioned at the bottom of the OP, two mods agreed to 2-B, and Armor (and Dalesean) agreed to Low 2-C via ED.
This is exactly where we are ^
Dalesean and I both disagreed with most of what OP is proposing. You're free to take any position you want but "widespread agreement" is not correct, and not something you should base your thread on.
As quoted above, you don't exactly have anything to be disproving, Armor. What SMG3 stated is exactly what happened and is happening. I understand your take that it isn't exactly "widespread" (albeit, it's still with merit, and we are currently at a "tiebreaker" of sorts), but Imaginym also mentioned their trust in DDM and FInepoint's judgements. So there isn't exactly anything going on here that you'd need to contest 😅

Regardless, I'm saying now that as of me writing this, we have three agreements for 2-B and a Bond UES
(and two disagreements, but agreements towards Low 2-C ED/Creation)

Jussst so nobody can come back and later say this was never the case if someone tries to prolong the thread beyond this.

But everything has been discussed, so I'd personally say we could close the thread and apply the changes? Don't want it to last six months again, haha
 
Last edited:
As quoted above, you don't exactly have anything to be disproving, Armor. What SMG3 stated is exactly what happened and is happening. I understand your take that it isn't exactly "widespread" (albeit, it's still with merit, and we are currently at a "tiebreaker" of sorts), but Imaginym also mentioned their trust in DDM and FInepoint's judgements. So there isn't exactly anything going on here that you'd need to contest 😅
It's manipulative wording. Makes it sound like we only agreed to part of the thread rather than rejected its majority.

3-2 is not a ratio of approvals you can use to conclude a thread, I believe it would need to be 4-2 at minimum. And certainly I would like there to be more debate (or time for me to gather more staff willing to read through it) if thread mods are just going to FRA a thread they don't even bother to read through.
 
Last edited:
It's manipulative wording. Makes it sound like we only agreed to part of the thread rather than rejected its majority.

3-2 is not a ratio of approvals you can use to conclude a thread, I believe it would need to be 4-2 at minimum. And certainly I would like there to be more debate (or time for me to gather more staff willing to read through it) if thread mods are just going to FRA a thread they don't even bother to read through.
Low 2-C Environmental Destruction for Reclusa seems fine and I agree with Armorchompy's points overall.
Guess mods here are FRA-ing a thread without even bothering to read the points I listed as well.
Alright, I'm gonna reiterate my replies since I feel like a lot's being slept on...

Within one of Dr. Vulko's notes, it's strongly implied that Connectar, which is the primary energy source of Concordia holds "limitless power", and later states the Bonds of family, friendship and love produce Connectar along with the Uni-Tree. Per the Tiering System FAQ, infinite power of one thing is generally described to be High 3-A. The Bonds are also stated to transcend the world, and everything exists precisely because everything in the world is born from the energy of the Bonds due to one's 'connections' with someone. The entire Super Mario Cosmology is currently 2-A, and affecting one to infinite 4-dimensional spacetime continuums is well within the Tier 2 range. By this logic, it should mean:
  • The Uni-Tree and the Bonds are at the very least High Universe level seeing as how they're producing Concordia with limitless power
  • The Bonds transcending the world and everything in the world existing because of the Bonds places them at Universe level+ to Multiverse level+
The OP is right on Bonds meeting criteria from the Universal Energy Systems...

...and it fits even more criteria which was posted later on in this thread. To correctly reiterate the third qualification in this part the OP listed, as I stated before in my previous post here, the UES page says:

This section of the page clearly tells us visual evidence of amplification isn't considered necessary; just that they have to demonstrate that they can channel their power through their own bodies in a way that quantifiably enhances them or otherwise allows scaling of their supernatural powers through their physicals, and there should be evidence that an increase in power / energy should correspond to a proportional increase in the potency of their physical statistics. The blog and the OP listed a few instances of the Bonds being used to enhance others and allow users to channel that power through their bodies:
All these instances meet that part of the UES standards of the page; furthermore, DDM stated another rule from the page in this reply:

This is proven when the Mario Bros beat Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla because when the Glohm leaves them upon their defeat, they revert back into their base forms and statistics while unconscious; not to mention the Bros are battling them with and WITHOUT the Bonds. With all these indicators combined, this must prove THE BONDS ACT AS A UES; even if it doesn't, the evidence of them acting as a stat amp is so blatant it's hard to ignore and not place on the profiles.

The "eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse" part is lacking context; the full statement from Shun is actually this:
Everyone carries some Glohm with them. Dark feelings... Loneliness... Disconnectedness... Reclusa's a monster that turns lonely feelings into energy. And he's been around since long before any of us were born. He hatches from an egg and fills the world with loneliness... When his power is up, he recharges in his egg. If we don't stop him... he'll keep doing that, again, and again.
But this DOESN'T mean Reclusa DOESN'T scale to the Bonds or his dream manipulation; in fact, Reclusa implied he previously broke everyone's connections in many other worlds and all that awaited them was a slow demise. The Glohm is the exact same substance Reclusa used to make the dreams, and it's also the same substance that was used to empower characters like Bowser and Gorumbla, whom Mario and Luigi defeated. The Soli-Tree is basically a warped, evil, dark version of the Uni-Tree; it was formed by Reclusa after he hatched from his egg when he first encountered the Mario Bros, and mind you, this is the exact same egg he recharges in.

Before anybody states Creation Feats need proof that they scale to physicals, I heavily implore you to watch the fights between Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla; they're shown to use techniques like Glohm-infused punches and shell attacks. Are they displaying explicit Tier 2 feats like universe/multiversal destruction or creation during these fights? Of course not, but this is generally how a lot of pages on this wiki operate:
  • Sonic and Son Goku haven't displayed Low Multiverse destruction on a constant everyday regular basis, yet there's at least one or a few instances of them scaling to characters on these tiers or have displayed one or a few instances of things like shaking the Macrocosm.
  • As someone who's worked on both the Hellboy and Spawn franchises/verses, while characters like Liz Sherman or Satan haven't constantly displayed Low 1-C or 7-B feats, they still sit on those tiers because they've performed the feat at least once.
None of these instances I listed are treated as outliers by the wiki, and we shouldn't be doing the same thing to characters like Mario, Luigi, and Reclusa in this thread. (And honestly, Idc if this is whataboutism because that's not the point).
 
Last edited:
It's manipulative wording. Makes it sound like we only agreed to part of the thread rather than rejected its majority.

3-2 is not a ratio of approvals you can use to conclude a thread, I believe it would need to be 4-2 at minimum. And certainly I would like there to be more debate (or time for me to gather more staff willing to read through it) if thread mods are just going to FRA a thread they don't even bother to read through.
Okay. I understand where you're coming from.

Albeit, from here on out, I'd implore you to at least acknowledge that from here on out, any more time the thread stays in play is not on me or my fault, and it should not be closed for such reasons.

Also, Thread Mods FRA'ing threads they aren't willing to read through is a constant issue on any side of any discussion. If I see someone actually list the points that they agree with, I trust that they aren't doing so.
Low 2-C Environmental Destruction for Reclusa seems fine and I agree with Armorchompy's points overall.
So I do believe this is a such example if you're implying Imaginym's is as well (unless you made that statement randomly). I do have a tangible reason to believe this is simply an attempt to drag out the thread and then put the blame on me (or to get Mario opponents to FRA the thread, as you suggested is possible.)

But yes, more debate time? I will allow it (obviously, as I must). But from here on out, don't pretend any additional time is fault of my own as with last time.

And in the time you requested, we should make sure we have truly read all points rather than leaving certain ones out to rot by framing new and/or unaddressed (especially unaddressed, as I see many of those already) points as repeats, as you have admitted to previously.

It'd be nice to start with this, if you're suggesting there is more to discuss (this hasn't been discussed yet, not doing this again!):
JPTheGamer said:
Alright, I'm gonna reiterate my replies since I feel like a lot's being slept on...

Within one of Dr. Vulko's notes, it's strongly implied that Connectar, which is the primary energy source of Concordia holds "limitless power", and later states the Bonds of family, friendship and love produce Connectar along with the Uni-Tree. Per the Tiering System FAQ, infinite power of one thing is generally described to be High 3-A. The Bonds are also stated to transcend the world, and everything exists precisely because everything in the world is born from the energy of the Bonds due to one's 'connections' with someone. The entire Super Mario Cosmology is currently 2-A, and affecting one to infinite 4-dimensional spacetime continuums is well within the Tier 2 range. By this logic, it should mean:

    • The Uni-Tree and the Bonds are at the very least High Universe level seeing as how they're producing Concordia with limitless power
    • The Bonds transcending the world and everything in the world existing because of the Bonds places them at Universe level+ to Multiverse level+
The OP is right on Bonds meeting criteria from the Universal Energy Systems...

...and it fits even more criteria which was posted later on in this thread. To correctly reiterate the third qualification in this part the OP listed, as I stated before in my previous post here, the UES page says:

This section of the page clearly tells us visual evidence of amplification isn't considered necessary; just that they have to demonstrate that they can channel their power through their own bodies in a way that quantifiably enhances them or otherwise allows scaling of their supernatural powers through their physicals, and there should be evidence that an increase in power / energy should correspond to a proportional increase in the potency of their physical statistics. The blog and the OP listed a few instances of the Bonds being used to enhance others and allow users to channel that power through their bodies:

All these instances meet that part of the UES standards of the page; furthermore, DDM stated another rule from the page in this reply:

This is proven when the Mario Bros beat Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla because when the Glohm leaves them upon their defeat, they revert back into their base forms and statistics while unconscious; not to mention the Bros are battling them with and WITHOUT the Bonds. With all these indicators combined, this must prove THE BONDS ACT AS A UES; even if it doesn't, the evidence of them acting as a stat amp is so blatant it's hard to ignore and not place on the profiles.

The "eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse" part is lacking context; the full statement from Shun is actually this:

Everyone carries some Glohm with them. Dark feelings... Loneliness... Disconnectedness... Reclusa's a monster that turns lonely feelings into energy. And he's been around since long before any of us were born. He hatches from an egg and fills the world with loneliness... When his power is up, he recharges in his egg. If we don't stop him... he'll keep doing that, again, and again.
But this DOESN'T mean Reclusa DOESN'T scale to the Bonds or his dream manipulation; in fact, Reclusa implied he previously broke everyone's connections in many other worlds and all that awaited them was a slow demise. The Glohm is the exact same substance Reclusa used to make the dreams, and it's also the same substance that was used to empower characters like Bowser and Gorumbla, whom Mario and Luigi defeated. The Soli-Tree is basically a warped, evil, dark version of the Uni-Tree; it was formed by Reclusa after he hatched from his egg when he first encountered the Mario Bros, and mind you, this is the exact same egg he recharges in.

Before anybody states Creation Feats need proof that they scale to physicals, I heavily implore you to watch the fights between Glohm Bowser and Glohm Gorumbla; they're shown to use techniques like Glohm-infused punches and shell attacks. Are they displaying explicit Tier 2 feats like universe/multiversal destruction or creation during these fights? Of course not, but this is generally how a lot of pages on this wiki operate:

    • Sonic and Son Goku haven't displayed Low Multiverse destruction on a constant everyday regular basis, yet there's at least one or a few instances of them scaling to characters on these tiers or have displayed one or a few instances of things like shaking the Macrocosm.
    • As someone who's worked on both the Hellboy and Spawn franchises/verses, while characters like Liz Sherman or Satan haven't constantly displayed Low 1-C or 7-B feats, they still sit on those tiers because they've performed the feat at least once.
None of these instances I listed are treated as outliers by the wiki, and we shouldn't be doing the same thing to characters like Mario, Luigi, and Reclusa in this thread. (And honestly, Idc if this is whataboutism because that's not the point).
 
Last edited:
I haven’t been keeping tabs on this thread all that much, so can someone remind me what were the main arguments against bonds being a UES again?
 
I haven’t been keeping tabs on this thread all that much, so can someone remind me what were the main arguments against bonds being a UES again?
I'm honestly not sure if there have been any, I don't think the opposition has addressed that yet. If any of them are reading this, I request they put up a summary of opposition and reasoning as we have been doing thus far.

They're free to correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Albeit, from here on out, I'd implore you to at least acknowledge that from here on out, any more time the thread stays in play is not on me or my fault, and it should not be closed for such reasons.
I didn't imply that. In previous threads that was the case, in this one I have seen no issues with your behavior, you're good.
Also, Thread Mods FRA'ing threads they aren't willing to read through is a constant issue on any side of any discussion. If I see someone actually list the points that they agree with, I trust that they aren't doing so.

So I do believe this is a such example if you're implying Imaginym's is as well (unless you made that statement randomly).
Maybe it is, I can't verify how much Maverick read through. But I didn't claim that Imaginym's vote should be discarded (and do not have the authority to do so), and Maverick's isn't any less valid. And while I've asked a few staff members to look at the thread they weren't one.
But yes, more debate time? I will allow it (obviously, as I must).
Could you quote your last post that was done in response to my points? There's been a bit of discussion since but I don't think it was super relevant to our discussion specifically.
 
I didn't imply that. In previous threads that was the case, in this one I have seen no issues with your behavior, you're good.
I'll take your word for it~

But regardless though, acknowledge my intention this time is certainly quite the opposite of whatever you think it was last time. I am not prolonging this thread.
Maybe it is, I can't verify how much Maverick read through. But I didn't claim that Imaginym's vote should be discarded (and do not have the authority to do so), and Maverick's isn't any less valid. And while I've asked a few staff members to look at the thread they weren't one.
Alright
Could you quote your last post that was done in response to my points? There's been a bit of discussion since but I don't think it was super relevant to our discussion specifically.
You probably want something from me, but I did clarify that @JPTheGamer said it best.


Everything I had/have to say should be somewhere in my blog or in this post.

Other things of potential interest:

Bond Feat from Dream Team scaling directly to the Dream Stone rather than Dreamy Bowser:

Uncle Radish (Grampy Turnip) full statement, as you requested
 
Last edited:
Vote Tally also once again focuses on upgrading Reclusa, even though the actual priority was supposed to be Mario & Luigi. Again, I may agree with some or even most things, but I see the opposition's point that various Mario supporters have a bad habit of not getting their priorities straight. There is only one vote tally that lists Reclusa related upgrades as opposed to the listed bullet changes. Not to mention, the listed bullet changes still list things contended or outright rejected and replaced with secondary proposals.

These are what the current changes in the OP lists, and I will list what has been done since then in bubbles.
  • Reclusa scales to 2-A. (Rejected, but replaced with 2-B proposals and/or Low 2-C environmental destruction as a proposed replacement)
  • Mario and Luigi scale to 2-A when using the full power of Bonds to match him. (2-A rejected, but been replaced with 2-B based on Dreamy Bowser scaling)
  • Characters who previously scaled to only the Pure Hearts now also scale to Bonds, and so do their parallel non-paper counterparts. (Still agreed Pure Hearts are the pinnacle and thus no agreed downscaling)
  • Bonds are established as a UES, and binding force of the verse. (UES part is still split, but proposals for Variable Tier justifications or an akin similar to Hulk's "Angrier he gets, the stronger he gets" but based on bonds, connections, and people thinking of each other is used to justify amps)
Here's what the OP should be changed to on the list of "Changes", or you could just cross out the rejected outright stuff.
  • Bonds are an official verse wide amp that could qualify as a UES, but at the very least justifies variable tiers and potential amps for many characters especially Mario & Luigi
  • Mario and Luigi get base tiers updated to Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-B when united at their peaks
    • Furthermore, footnotes that they cannot reach the tier on their own and require being together to achieve it.
  • Reclusa scales from 2-Bbased on the idea that Mario & Luigi are using bonds at peak that exceeded when they fought Dreamy Bowser
    • If this does not work, Low 2-C environmental destruction for Reclusa could still be valid
The idea of Power of Bonds performing a 2-A stabilization feat was once again something thrown in the middle of the thread as opposed to something that was thoroughly analyzed before the thread's creation or elaborated upon in the OP, which is another thing the opposition keeps complaining about. And at best, it should be saved for its own thread instead of arguing here. But will get into the Vote Tally.

Agree: DarkDragonMedeus (With Bonds being a UES, Mario Bros having variable tiers and united peak up to 2-B, Reclusa being 2-B), FinePoint (Same as DarkDragonMedeus), Imaginym (Same as DarkDragonMedeus)

Disagree: Armorchompy (With UES and 2-B Reclusa, but agreement for Low 2-C Creation/ED for Reclusa), Maverick (same as chompy), Dalesean (same as chompy)


Cannot determine the rest. iirc, ArmorChompy at least agreed with a variable tier justification and that 2-B is something Mario and Luigi can only reach when they fight together and shouldn't be assumed accessible in one on one fights. But he is welcome to comment again to clarify, and both Maverick and Dalesean said they agree with ArmorChompy, but they may also clarify.
 
Vote Tally also once again focuses on upgrading Reclusa, even though the actual priority was supposed to be Mario & Luigi. Again, I may agree with some or even most things, but I see the opposition's point that various Mario supporters have a bad habit of not getting their priorities straight. There is only one vote tally that lists Reclusa related upgrades as opposed to the listed bullet changes. Not to mention, the listed bullet changes still list things contended or outright rejected and replaced with secondary proposals.

These are what the current changes in the OP lists, and I will list what has been done since then in bubbles.
  • Reclusa scales to 2-A. (Rejected, but replaced with 2-B proposals and/or Low 2-C environmental destruction as a proposed replacement)
  • Mario and Luigi scale to 2-A when using the full power of Bonds to match him. (2-A rejected, but been replaced with 2-B based on Dreamy Bowser scaling)
  • Characters who previously scaled to only the Pure Hearts now also scale to Bonds, and so do their parallel non-paper counterparts. (Still agreed Pure Hearts are the pinnacle and thus no agreed downscaling)
  • Bonds are established as a UES, and binding force of the verse. (UES part is still split, but proposals for Variable Tier justifications or an akin similar to Hulk's "Angrier he gets, the stronger he gets" but based on bonds, connections, and people thinking of each other is used to justify amps)
Here's what the OP should be changed to on the list of "Changes", or you could just cross out the rejected outright stuff.
  • Bonds are an official verse wide amp that could qualify as a UES, but at the very least justifies variable tiers and potential amps for many characters especially Mario & Luigi
  • Mario and Luigi get base tiers updated to Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-Bwhen united at their peaks
    • Furthermore, footnotes that they cannot reach the tier on their own and require being together to achieve it.
  • Reclusa scales from 2-Bbased on the idea that Mario & Luigi are using bonds at peak that exceeded when they fought Dreamy Bowser
    • If this does not work, Low 2-C environmental destruction for Reclusa could still be valid
The idea of Power of Bonds performing a 2-A stabilization feat was once again something thrown in the middle of the thread as opposed to something that was thoroughly analyzed before the thread's creation or elaborated upon in the OP, which is another thing the opposition keeps complaining about. And at best, it should be saved for its own thread instead of arguing here. But will get into the Vote Tally.

Agree: DarkDragonMedeus (With Bonds being a UES, Mario Bros having variable tiers and united peak up to 2-B, Reclusa being 2-B), FinePoint (Same as DarkDragonMedeus), Imaginym (Same as DarkDragonMedeus)

Disagree: Armorchompy (With UES and 2-B Reclusa, but agreement for Low 2-C Creation/ED for Reclusa), Maverick (same as chompy), Dalesean (same as chompy)


Cannot determine the rest. iirc, ArmorChompy at least agreed with a variable tier justification and that 2-B is something Mario and Luigi can only reach when they fight together and shouldn't be assumed accessible in one on one fights. But he is welcome to comment again to clarify, and both Maverick and Dalesean said they agree with ArmorChompy, but they may also clarify.
Want me to change it to what you suggested?
 
Vote Tally also once again focuses on upgrading Reclusa, even though the actual priority was supposed to be Mario & Luigi. Again, I may agree with some or even most things, but I see the opposition's point that various Mario supporters have a bad habit of not getting their priorities straight. There is only one vote tally that lists Reclusa related upgrades as opposed to the listed bullet changes. Not to mention, the listed bullet changes still list things contended or outright rejected and replaced with secondary proposals.

These are what the current changes in the OP lists, and I will list what has been done since then in bubbles.
  • Reclusa scales to 2-A. (Rejected, but replaced with 2-B proposals and/or Low 2-C environmental destruction as a proposed replacement)
  • Mario and Luigi scale to 2-A when using the full power of Bonds to match him. (2-A rejected, but been replaced with 2-B based on Dreamy Bowser scaling)
  • Characters who previously scaled to only the Pure Hearts now also scale to Bonds, and so do their parallel non-paper counterparts. (Still agreed Pure Hearts are the pinnacle and thus no agreed downscaling)
  • Bonds are established as a UES, and binding force of the verse. (UES part is still split, but proposals for Variable Tier justifications or an akin similar to Hulk's "Angrier he gets, the stronger he gets" but based on bonds, connections, and people thinking of each other is used to justify amps)
Here's what the OP should be changed to on the list of "Changes", or you could just cross out the rejected outright stuff.
  • Bonds are an official verse wide amp that could qualify as a UES, but at the very least justifies variable tiers and potential amps for many characters especially Mario & Luigi
  • Mario and Luigi get base tiers updated to Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-Bwhen united at their peaks
    • Furthermore, footnotes that they cannot reach the tier on their own and require being together to achieve it.
  • Reclusa scales from 2-Bbased on the idea that Mario & Luigi are using bonds at peak that exceeded when they fought Dreamy Bowser
    • If this does not work, Low 2-C environmental destruction for Reclusa could still be valid
The idea of Power of Bonds performing a 2-A stabilization feat was once again something thrown in the middle of the thread as opposed to something that was thoroughly analyzed before the thread's creation or elaborated upon in the OP, which is another thing the opposition keeps complaining about. And at best, it should be saved for its own thread instead of arguing here. But will get into the Vote Tally.

Agree: DarkDragonMedeus (With Bonds being a UES, Mario Bros having variable tiers and united peak up to 2-B, Reclusa being 2-B), FinePoint (Same as DarkDragonMedeus), Imaginym (Same as DarkDragonMedeus)

Disagree: Armorchompy (With UES and 2-B Reclusa, but agreement for Low 2-C Creation/ED for Reclusa), Maverick (same as chompy), Dalesean (same as chompy)


Cannot determine the rest. iirc, ArmorChompy at least agreed with a variable tier justification and that 2-B is something Mario and Luigi can only reach when they fight together and shouldn't be assumed accessible in one on one fights. But he is welcome to comment again to clarify, and both Maverick and Dalesean said they agree with ArmorChompy, but they may also clarify.
Yeah, this should be a great compromise.
 
I'll take your word for it~

But regardless though, acknowledge my intention this time is certainly quite the opposite of whatever you think it was last time. I am not prolonging this thread.

Alright

You probably want something from me, but I did clarify that @JPTheGamer said it best.


Everything I had/have to say should be somewhere in my blog or in this post.

Other things of potential interest:

Bond Feat from Dream Team scaling directly to the Dream Stone rather than Dreamy Bowser:

Uncle Radish (Grampy Turnip) full statement, as you requested
Right, Armorchompy, please take a look at this~
 

Yeah I can agree to the compromise pushed by DDM.

I would note that the Dreamy Bowser scaling is meh, it'd be better to scale to the Zeekeeper since that's got the most amount of evidence, but they're both 2-B so it's a minor nitpick at best
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top