• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Amazing Downgraded Circus (TADC Downgrades)

Can we stop discussing Hazbin Hotel? What was or wasn't accepted there is irrelevant.
It is actually relevant. The whole point of the thread is to be consistent with what is currently accepted.
I already said that weapons were created by Cain to harm the humans.
He creates everything, so by the same logic friendly Caine wouldn’t make explosions lethal.
 
we already have creator statements that any harm given to the characters will be responded to in the "most cartoonish way possible." So why do we assume that Caine is actively making the explosions weaker rather than just them being able to take whatever he throws at them
 
also I really am lost on all the hazbin talk, overall just don't agree with the downgrading arguments being used. feels like a lot of cherrypicking for the sake of making the verse weaker
 
Ye I feel like it doesn't take much to be able to upscale Caine from the humans at bare minimum. I don't even see it as unreasonable to upscale him from NPCs
 
Also, Kaufmo has a 9A feat and Ragatha took a beating from him.
She literally got destroyed a hell ton dawg, surviving the attacks is not the same as withstanding.
Ye I feel like it doesn't take much to be able to upscale Caine from the humans at bare minimum
That’s what I’m saying to do? Though that’d be via abilities and size manip, otherwise he should probably he comparable.
 
She literally got destroyed a hell ton dawg, surviving the attacks is not the same as withstanding.

That’s what I’m saying to do? Though that’d be via abilities and size manip, otherwise he should probably he comparable.

So are you no longer arguing for 10-A?
 
She literally got destroyed a hell ton dawg, surviving the attacks is not the same as withstanding.
Ragatha is torn apart when she takes a blow she can't withstand; her body was still intact after taking a beating from a 9A, she just couldn't stand because of the corruption HAX.
That’s what I’m saying to do? Though that’d be via abilities and size manip, otherwise he should probably he comparable.
I already mentioned that the NPCs' statement has support
 
The OP explicitly argued for 10-C (misspoke saying 10-A, sorry) and we've been arguing for much of the thread on reality equalization

But yeah I still think upscale from NPCs seems fine since he created everything in the circus from nothing
 
The OP explicitly argued for 10-C (misspoke saying 10-A, sorry) and we've been arguing for much of the thread on reality equalization
I gave two options, 10-C is just the last one, 9-C is provided before.

There’s a reason why I did separate agree-disagree-neutral for each section yk?
 
The 10-C tier change is utterly ridiculous. Reality Equalization is a thing and its what applies here. Don't know enough about the verse to say anything about the rest but fall damage is a laughably bad argument for a downgrade, given how variable it is in what characters it affects across fiction. That is all.
 
I feel like the anti-feats we see in the show can be chalked up to the fact that this is a cartoony world in which they react to things in a cartoon way. In a cartoon a character can be flattened by a door opening really fast and splattering them to a wall, but it doesn't mean they're door level- their body is just rubbery and mushy. The characters here behave the same way, but we don't rely on the lower-end cartoony showings to determine their capabilities.

As we see throughout the show, those who are more concentrated and focused can pull off more absurd feats- Jax acts as the one most in-tune with cartoony behavior throughout the show due to his motif of "this isn't real," and once she is told to stop acting realistically, Pomni can fire a gun perfectly and even bounce a bullet off multiple walls in an inconceivable way.
 
I feel like the anti-feats we see in the show can be chalked up to the fact that this is a cartoony world in which they react to things in a cartoon way. In a cartoon a character can be flattened by a door opening really fast and splattering them to a wall, but it doesn't mean they're door level- their body is just rubbery and mushy. The characters here behave the same way, but we don't rely on the lower-end cartoony showings to determine their capabilities.
Wouldn't this rather fall into their type 2 immortality territory? These stuff still actually hurt them.
 
It is actually relevant. The whole point of the thread is to be consistent with what is currently accepted.

He creates everything, so by the same logic friendly Caine wouldn’t make explosions lethal.
Are you aware that there is a list of tropes specifically categorized as Acceptable Breaks from Reality? Cause the guns being able to damage the characters(as well as the anti-feats in general) can easily be explained by either the Arbitrary Gun Power trope(Firearms doing different damage than they would in real life for the sake of balance), Artistic License-Physics(The creator of a work of fiction plays with the basic laws of physics in order to make the story better.), and/or the Rule of Funny(The limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief for a given element is directly proportional to its funniness.)
 
Are you aware that there is a list of tropes specifically categorized as Acceptable Breaks from Reality? Cause the guns being able to damage the characters(as well as the anti-feats in general) can easily be explained by either the Arbitrary Gun Power trope(Firearms doing different damage than they would in real life for the sake of balance), Artistic License-Physics(The creator of a work of fiction plays with the basic laws of physics in order to make the story better.), and/or the Rule of Funny(The limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief for a given element is directly proportional to its funniness.)
Why are you using TV Tropes for this? We accept whether or not guns/weapons are considered as anti-feats by either if there's something proving they aren't, or the amount of feats. Some verses have it as anti-feats because they regularly get harmed by it, while not having much higher tier feats, so the higher tier feats would be considered outliers. For other verses, they might have some gun anti-feats, but they would also have a lot of higher tier feats, that the outliers in question would be the guns, not the higher tier feats.
 
Guns damaging the characters here is not an anti-feat because it was part of an in-universe game in which the characters were given the ability to 'lose lives' based on being shot with a bullet. One can say the guns that were created were simply made to be able to harm them for the sake of the adventure.
 
Why are you using TV Tropes for this? We accept whether or not guns/weapons are considered as anti-feats by either if there's something proving they aren't, or the amount of feats. Some verses have it as anti-feats because they regularly get harmed by it, while not having much higher tier feats, so the higher tier feats would be considered outliers. For other verses, they might have some gun anti-feats, but they would also have a lot of higher tier feats, that the outliers in question would be the guns, not the higher tier feats.
Because OP's entire argument hinges on Caine's creations being limited to the statistics/attributes their real world counterparts have, even though Caine can easily adjust the parameters of his creations according to what he wants for the given adventure. So to me this just reads as an argument of incredulity.
 
Last edited:
Yeah like, Caine can make people vegan and beam memories into their heads, why wouldn't he be able to adjust certain statistics?

Plus we see that getting to zero lives in the gun adventure just sends you to "The Loser Corner," losing the hearts is not indicative of actually having fatal damage but just how close you are to losing.
 
Plus we see that getting to zero lives in the gun adventure just sends you to "The Loser Corner," losing the hearts is not indicative of actually having fatal damage.
Did you not see Kinger falling, Ragatha getting her head blown, or holes in Jax and Pomni's bodies?
 
Did you not see Kinger falling, Ragatha getting her head blown, or holes in Jax and Pomni's bodies?

Why do we assume the guns Caine creates in the circus abide by real-world stats when in the gun pile was also Uzi's railgun? I feel like it's easy to assume he just made the guns to be able to hurt them for the sake of the adventure.
 
Why do we assume the guns Caine creates in the circus abide by real-world stats when in the gun pile was also Uzi's railgun? I feel like it's easy to assume he just made the guns to be able to hurt them for the sake of the adventure.
Then, by the same logic, he could have made all their feats, like explosion, not killing them for the sake of the adventure.

You can't have your cake and eat it.
 
Then, by the same logic, he could have made all their feats, like explosion, not killing them for the sake of the adventure.

You can't have your cake and eat it.
Isn't that just the opposite logic?

"he made guns with the purpose of being able to harm them" vs "he made every single thing in the circus as weak as possible to avoid hurting them"

doesn't it follow Occam's Razor to say that the few times they receive significant damage (which would basically just be "guns that caine created for the 'shooting each other' adventure") would be Caine messing with things, not every other time they have a feat of durability or strength being rigged?

It feels like you have to jump through more hoops to say that all the feats are invalid.
 
I don't see how it makes more sense that the characters are naturally weak and Caine has to make adventures easy on purpose to avoid hurting them, compared to just them being naturally tough and cartoony and being able to take damage.

Feels like a misread of the narrative of the show to think that Caine is going into all his adventures thinking "the humans are very weak and the slightest breeze can harm them so I better make sure to go easy on them and keep everything as weak as possible!"
 
Feels like a misread of the narrative of the show to think that Caine is going into all his adventures thinking "the humans are very weak and the slightest breeze can harm them so I better make sure to go easy on them and keep everything as weak as possible!"
5aqoih.jpg


Literally not what I said at all.
 
"he could have made all their feats, like explosion, not killing them for the sake of the adventure"

"he can do it in the opposite way to make them harm less"

this is literally a thread in which you're attempting to downgrade the cast as low as possible by listing off a bunch of anti-feats and saying "therefore they're actually all weak"

you can't say "you're strawmanning" when I repeat back what your arguments are
 
I'm using a thing called "hyperbole" to point out that it is silly to assume Caine is going through the effort of making everything in the adventures weak enough not to harm them rather than the cast just having natural endurance... which, y'know, already is confirmed since Gooseworx has said nothing can kill them

you're still not responding to the core of my argument and rather cherrypicking select words.
 
"he made guns with the purpose of being able to harm them" vs "he made every single thing in the circus as weak as possible to avoid hurting them"

doesn't it follow Occam's Razor to say that the few times they receive significant damage (which would basically just be "guns that caine created for the 'shooting each other' adventure") would be Caine messing with things, not every other time they have a feat of durability or strength being rigged?
I'm inclined to agree on BatFellow with this.
Not exactly like we treat gun anti-feats as super damning unless you're arguing for some crazy tier. Hell, Hellaverse didn't get downgraded past 9-A for their anti-feats, so it definitely shouldn't be used as an example here.
 
Looking back at those anti-feats I really do struggle to see how any of them are supposed to prove that these characters can't possibly scale that high. Zooble falls from a very small height and appears annoyed, we get a montage of Caine doing stuff to them most of which we don't even see the direct effects of, they appear scared of falling so... guess that automatically means they're threatened by it (irrational fears don't exist!) and the gun thing which is already talked about.

Also I completely overlooked the whole "Caine couldn't program in explosion yields in the game because the data wasn't fed to him" logic... don't really know where to start with that. Not only assumes that Caine's only data was the images we saw but ignores the fact that the Circus also has sound... and gravity... and trucks... and Uzi's railgun from Murder Drones... all things that we didn't see him get fed. How did he program in the formula for gravity witout getting it directly? Almost like we're just supposed to suspend our disbelief and understand this is not meant to be like a realistic computer simulation.
 
Back
Top