• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Murder Drones CRT: Black Hole Calculation Removal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kirua29 said:
Yeah, Low-end vaporisation. Mid-end atomization. High-end subatomic destruction.
Click to expand...
atomization and subatomic destruction r only usable via direct statements tho, I'm not sure we should use such high end methods to calculate these feats
 
AyOgUyS said:
atomization and subatomic destruction r only usable via direct statements tho, I'm not sure we should use such high end methods to calculate these feats
Click to expand...
Yeah, I get what you mean, but the issue is that the result doesn’t really make much sense with vaporization. I also explained that the Null behaves like a form of reality warping, so subatomic destruction should logically be considered. Still, I’d rather see what Mr. Bambu thinks about it.

But I also have another Large Planet level feat in reserve, just in case. And I think I could also prove a Universe level tier, but that would be complicated.
 
Last edited:
I recall something about the solver working on a quantum level? Would that affect this or does subatomic need to be said outright if not ill go looking but ill have to get home first so give me 30 or so minutes
 
Camerontaylor07 said:
I recall something about the solver working on a quantum level? Would that affect this or does subatomic need to be said outright if not ill go looking but ill have to get home first so give me 30 or so minutes
Click to expand...
Can you give your proof please ? and ping mr.bambu

64brz9H.png
 
Last edited:
Kirua29 said:
Can you give your proof please? And ping Mr Bambu
Click to expand...
Apparently, there are 2 I couldn't find the one that was about how the disassemblers' arms worked Again sorry I don't know how to insert things well in this site so I just have to find Reddit posts with the scan

But I realised something the solver has matter manipulation, which it did to an arrow to do that, it'd have to manipulate atoms so that's at least atomic

Furthermore, the solver manipulates stuff on an informational level or at least seems To be this is all the information I have ... that I could find at least

Well and this i just found
I also have never pinged before how do i do that



My phones about to die so if i respond itl be latter
 
Last edited:
Camerontaylor07 said:
Apparently, there are 2 I couldn't find the one that was about how the disassemblers' arms worked Again sorry I don't know how to insert things well in this site so I just have to find Reddit posts with the scan

But I realised something the solver has matter manipulation, which it did to an arrow to do that, it'd have to manipulate atoms so that's at least atomic

Furthermore, the solver manipulates stuff on an informational level or at least seems To be this is all the information I have ... that I could find at least

Well and this i just found
I also have never pinged before how do i do that



My phones about to die so if i respond itl be latter
Click to expand...
Aaah yeah, I see what you mean—you're talking about that, right?
 
Last edited:
Kirua29 said:
And now with the link?
Click to expand...
I have seen it now but no, I remember a Liam post about the disassemblers mentioning it in how their arms work but I cannot find it so I'm dropping it regardless the other quantum mentions directly mentioning the solver with it is something and the information helps the case a bit

As for the image you sent, I assume you're talking about the information part of what I said in which case yes part of it
 
Last edited:
Camerontaylor07 said:
I have seen it now but no, I remember a Liam post about the disassemblers mentioning it in how their arms work but I cannot find it so I'm dropping it regardless the other quantum mentions directly mentioning the solver with it is something and the information helps the case a bit

As for the image you sent, I assume you're talking about the information part of what I said in which case yes part of it
Click to expand...
Ah yes this link
 
Kirua29 said:
So, i finished.

I included both the mid-end and the high-end like I told you, for two reasons. Basically, I argued that the Null acts like a form of reality warping, so we should consider both possibilities. Plus Based on additional information found on the Glitch Inn server (the official Discord server of the studio behind the series), we can see that the Absolute Solver can manipulate mass, matter, and materials. This suggests it operates at a subatomic level, since it alters the very nature of atoms. Is that enough ? Oh, I also forgot about that, but it’s additional evidence for the black hole anyway.

if you want, I can remove them if you disagree, but that would be a bit unfortunate, since I only get Country level for low and mid, and Planet level for high.

“at least Country level” feels weird when they are clearly shown to be higher physically—it wouldn’t really make sense to say physicaly planet level and at least country, possibly higher. It would be more logical for it to be at the same level or higher.

Like you want.

Here : https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kirua29/Destruction_of_Earth

64brz9H.png
Click to expand...
Alright. I note that we do have a 5-B feat already, that just means this isn't an upgrade on that. It's also worth noting that in most cases, any feat where a planet is destroyed is considered, at a minimum, to be higher than the Gravitational Binding Energy of that planet; for Earth, this is exactly baseline 5-B. However, I'm not sure that applies to the weird nature of the Nulls just sort of disappearing stuff on contact, since GBE is more about the damage necessary to rip a planet apart.

So all of this is to say that they're remaining 5-B, at least.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
At this point, we're waiting for the possibility of a hasty calc from @Kirua29. That's it. Because the thread is rapidly degrading, the temptation exists to simply conclude it, apply the calc that is currently done, and let a later thread handle whatever calc is produced from Kirua.
Click to expand...
Since we're going in the direction of calculating other feats for MD,

I request someone to please evaluate this
 
Last edited:
I'll say here what I said offsite:

I might get to this calc. The subject has sort of drawn on unnecessarily, and this calc is not related at all to the OP. It is also a bending calc, which are famously low-regulation at the moment, tend to give high results, and can often lead to issues. Given that this CRT has already eaten a disproportionate amount of my time lately (and very much wanted to eat more than it already has), I am hesitant to get into it. If I disagree, would I then have an accused agenda against Murder Drones, even acknowledging how problematic these sorts of feats tend to be? It is a time dump and risk I am slow to be willing to take.

My interest now is in getting the current discussion done. With no better feats having arrived, I now propose someone familiar with the verse begin removing the Null black hole feats from pages, replacing them with the approved 5-B calc on all who scale. Are there any issues related to this subject that need ironing out?
 
Mr. Bambu said:
I'll say here what I said offsite:

I might get to this calc. The subject has sort of drawn on unnecessarily, and this calc is not related at all to the OP. It is also a bending calc, which are famously low-regulation at the moment, tend to give high results, and can often lead to issues. Given that this CRT has already eaten a disproportionate amount of my time lately (and very much wanted to eat more than it already has), I am hesitant to get into it. If I disagree, would I then have an accused agenda against Murder Drones, even acknowledging how problematic these sorts of feats tend to be? It is a time dump and risk I am slow to be willing to take.

My interest now is in getting the current discussion done. With no better feats having arrived, I now propose someone familiar with the verse begin removing the Null black hole feats from pages, replacing them with the approved 5-B calc on all who scale. Are there any issues related to this subject that need ironing out?
Click to expand...
You talk about my calc ? https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kirua29/Destruction_of_Earth If that’s the case, you forgot to say in the comments that you approved it. If you’re talking about something else, I didn’t understand. I can implement the changes once I've received your response.

And sorry for taking up so much of your time.
 
Last edited:
Kirua29 said:
You talk about my calc? https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kirua29/Destruction_of_Earth If that’s the case, you forgot to say in the comments that you approved it. If you’re talking about something else, I didn’t understand. I can implement the changes once I've received your response.

And sorry for taking up so much of your time.
Click to expand...
From my understanding, he's not sure if he wants to look at your calc or not and views it as irrelevant to this thread he just wants this thread done and the changes applied by a knowledgeable member at least i think thats what he meant
 
Camerontaylor07 said:
From my understanding, he's not sure if he wants to look at your calc or not and views it as irrelevant to this thread he just wants this thread done and the changes applied by a knowledgeable member at least i think thats what he meant
Click to expand...
Mr. Bambu said:
replacing them with the approved 5-B calc
Click to expand...
I think he talk about my calc. the only 5-b calc is mine.
 
Last edited:
The format would be "Planet level" or "At least Planet level", followed by just "higher".
 
Mr. Bambu said:
The format would be "Planet level" or "At least Planet level", followed by just "higher".
Click to expand...
Ok but higher with what ? I can't just put "higher" without specifying anything, can I ? And in AP, what do I put for the higher?
 
Kirua29 said:
Ok but higher with what ? I can't just put "higher" without specifying anything, can I ? And in AP, what do I put for the higher?
Click to expand...
As already pointed out, that is exactly how it works. "[You can add "at least/likely/possibly" here if necessary] Planet level (justifications), [you can add "likely/possibly" here if necessary] higher [you can add "via ___" here, if its via a specific technique or ability or what have you] (justifications)"
 
Mr. Bambu said:
As already pointed out, that is exactly how it works. "[You can add "at least/likely/possibly" here if necessary] Planet level (justifications), [you can add "likely/possibly" here if necessary] higher [you can add "via ___" here, if its via a specific technique or ability or what have you] (justifications)"
Click to expand...
I think everything is good now ? And I also removed the black hole creation ability.

72d9pzV.png

Jfay4IG.png

mi8X0Ab.png

HpJOSR6.png


And thank you for the help, because this is one of the rare times I make big changes to a profile; usually it's more about small changes.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Bambu said:
As already pointed out, that is exactly how it works. "[You can add "at least/likely/possibly" here if necessary] Planet level (justifications), [you can add "likely/possibly" here if necessary] higher [you can add "via ___" here, if its via a specific technique or ability or what have you] (justifications)"
Click to expand...
Since the changes were applied, this should be closed right?

Also tryna fr understand how tf I didn't get notified despite having previously messaged here
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Soul80
  • Locked
Murder Drones CRT: hax addition(Accepted)
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Soul80
Soul80
Psychomaster35
  • Locked
Murder Drones: NULL The Downplay
2 3
Replies
85
Views
6K
Mythic381
Mythic381
RealDuker98
  • Locked
Murder Drones CRT: Upgrades
Replies
14
Views
4K
RealDuker98
RealDuker98
Kirua29
Murder drones CRT: major revisions
6 7 8
Replies
286
Views
11K
Mythic381
Mythic381
Buraqibear
JJK's black Hole calc problem
Replies
21
Views
3K
Buraqibear
Buraqibear
Back
Top