• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Bondin' Jimmy (2-A Mario Bonds UES CRT)

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Galactidot, I'd like to ask you to please be a little more patient and level-headed here, even if you don't mean otherwise. I get you're really passionate about these threads and are frustrated that they're not getting passed (trust me; I myself and a lot of others are, too), but we don't want what happened in the previous threads you made to also happen here. Okay? Thank you.
No. I'm being patient and level-headed as I should be. This has nothing to do with the tread passing, I am rather simply frustrated that I've had to answer this simple question multiple times.

Armor is asking real questions, see how I'm answering them in stride. Lou_change has asked the same question multiple times, received an answer multiple times, and hasn't acknowledged it or looked at the blog for the same answer once, as far as I'm aware.
 
The first one is intended to back up the second one. In isolation (no pun intended), I could see what you mean. But Cozette, the Wattanist Bond Guardian, explicitly says ENERGY of Bonds.
Gotcha, I'd still like to see it though.
Shared MP, maybe, except for some scenarios
Bowser's minions, on the other hand? There's a whole game about it showing a HEAVY opposite. See this whole segment:
I'm not denying it can happen to Goombas and such, I'm questioning whether it's happening in that scene specifically. Bowser's Inside Story is very inconsistent about Bowser's strength, could just be a low end showing for him.
This wouldn't be necessary for such a broad concept. The game even jokes about how broad it is in the case of Wilma and the Extension Corps! Simply holding hands can account for tangible energy.
Well I don't think you've actually shown anything that says it's all friendship/teamwork/whatever and that any use of that is inherently invoking Bonds. It's a universal force of some kind sure, so I don't think it's an unreasonable interpretation, but at the same time if you're trying to upscale Brothership from any other showing of this kind of power of friendship thing you'd probably want clear statements.
I'm a bit confused here, that's not explicit?
Explicit would be if they said "we're using Bonds here". Anyways, that's just a nitpick, don't mind it.
That's because of later context provided by his death.

I saw Lou_Change earlier claim that Glohm existed before Reclusa, only to switch up when I mentioned his death destroying all of it. I think you guys need to pick your version or the games' version before anything else.
I don't really need to align my claims with Lou's, we're not arguing together we both just happen to disagree. But I dunno, "bad guy dies and stuff related to them falls apart" is a pretty common trope, it doesn't really imply conceptual existence (and if it did beating up Reclusa's physical form wouldn't actually do anything to affect the very concept of Glohm itself, but I digress). All of Ganon's Gloom disappears after he's defeated in TotK, Ganondorf's tower crumbles in Ocarina of Time after you take him down, Dracula's castle usually falls to pieces in Castlevania, the planet's core collapses when Sephiroth is defeated in FF7, even Mother Brain flips a dead man's switch on a planetary bomb... obviously this is different but other than "Reclusa had control over Glohm" it doesn't really show much, and we knew that already.
Also, considering Bonds make dimensions, I think it should now be a lot clearer HOW he destroys worlds, yeah?
We had a whole thread going back and forth about this. I still stand by the position that he doesn't really do that.
If your bomb is destroyed or you die, does the other cease to be? Please answer this first.
No but that doesn't change anything. There's a lot more issues to scaling him to all the Glohm than just him being its direct source. He needs to be capable of fully drawing upon its power at a moment's notice in a fight, and everything else in the UES.
I don't recall you giving me that scan proving he does so through the victim's minds. Give me that to counter mine of him making them before they even touch someone's head, and we can settle this one.
Literally every instance of him making the worlds is evidence of such, given he needs to put them in a matrix-style "lotus eater machine" of sorts which screws with their heads. Your arguments against that have basically consisted of trying to prove that Reclusa can freely edit and create dreams which is true... as long as they're in the flowers and he can mess with their brains.

Hell it even looks like a lotus flower, I'm pretty sure that's the visual reference
I'll let DDM deal with this, unless I decide to later.
Sure.
I figured I'd mention it in the blog anyways, for clarification and to show that all points are checked between Bonds and Glohm.
Sure.
 
Last edited:
No. I'm being patient and level-headed as I should be. This has nothing to do with the tread passing, I am rather simply frustrated that I've had to answer this simple question multiple times.

Armor is asking real questions, see how I'm answering them in stride. Lou_change has asked the same question multiple times, received an answer multiple times, and hasn't acknowledged it or looked at the blog for the same answer once, as far as I'm aware.
I know, but please keep a more open mind here. That's all I ask, thank you.
I don't really need to align my claims with Lou's, we're not arguing together we both just happen to disagree. But I dunno, "bad guy dies and stuff related to them falls apart" is a pretty common trope, it doesn't really imply conceptual existence (and if it did beating up Reclusa's physical form wouldn't actually do anything to affect the very concept of Glohm itself, but I digress). All of Ganon's Gloom disappears after he's defeated in TotK, Ganondorf's tower crumbles in Ocarina of Time after you take him down, Dracula's castle usually falls to pieces in Castlevania, the planet's core collapses when Sephiroth is defeated in FF7, even Mother Brain flips a dead man's switch on a planetary bomb... obviously this is different but other than "Reclusa had control over Glohm" it doesn't really show much, and we knew that already.
Fiction doesn't always use this trope and/or follow its rules. Like I said before, just because a source of something can die or fade away doesn't mean the concept or thing it embodies will go along with it. Creators in fiction and non-fiction will die, yes, but the things they create like a story, product, or concept such as fear, justice, or love outlive them and still continue to exist.

After Hellboy killed Satan with a dagger in Hellboy in Hell, and when Liz Sherman used her full power to eradicate the rest of the Ogdru Jahad and Hem on Earth in the last issue of B.P.R.D.: The Devil You Know, Hell didn't cease to exist and evil still continued to live on in the world. A similar thing like this happened after Spawn #262. Spawn killed and/or defeated Satan, but it didn't erase all of the demons, nor did Hell get wiped from existence. Evil and Hell still existed in these instances, despite both versions of Satan being the embodiment of evil and creator of Hell.

Hypothetically, Reclusa could be the embodiment of evil and also the creator of Hell, but it doesn't mean all evil and Hell would cease to exist after he dies.
 
I grow tired of being insulted so let me explain.

Reclusa being the source of all Glohm is based on him being referred to as the embodiment of Glohm. However we have explicit confirmation that he is not directly responsible for spite bulbs and they are a way to produce glohm so he isn't the source of all of it.

This isn't fundamentally necessary for the scaling however all we really need to prove is he creates and maintains the dream worlds in fact he supposed prepares them himself.

Now I have been hopping in and out of the discussion previously for a bit so just to double check they are confirmed to be sleeping dreams, right? They are referred to as dreams once and are otherwise referred to as fantasies, and as someone's own world, both phrases usually reserved for daydreaming which I don't think creates worlds in Mario. Dream also refers to desires and the scenarios basically always exist to fulfill such desires. Characters consistently talk clearly while inside them unlike normal sleep talking and they also aren't ever referred to as falling asleep from what I seen.

That whole tangent aside dreams he creates a lot of them. However we don't know how many at a time which is kinda important because that's how our rules work. Of course that wouldn't matter if the dreams were actively being substained the blog says it substains stuff but gives no further explanation. It is probably because all of this that definitely implies that's a thing. I don't think that proves the dreams were destroyed only the flowers trapping them. One could argue the fact they left these dreams that they weren't willing to suggests that the dream went with the flower. However they transformed into bond energy which basically serves to connect people which could explain it or the fall and disconnect from the flower forcefully woke them up and the dream still exists. Speaking of which the idea a dream needs to be substained is fundamentally different from pretty much every other dream world in the series making it questionable if they should be treated the same as normal dreams.

That doesn't matter because we have this claim "He is stated to be capable of eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse, furthering him scaling to all of Bonds beyond him being its equal." That link says something a bit different it says he'll do it again and again implying he won't actually destroy all bonds, at least all at once so scaling to the Pure Hearts which also amplify the power of love is questionable he also goes about eradicating bonds in a particular way, trapping people in dreams and leaving the rest to hopelessly suffer this works great because bonds don't automatically protect themselves the members of the bond have to actively try to work for or with the bond at bare minimum which this usually prevents. Also where is he stated to be its equal.
 
Reclusa being the source of all Glohm is based on him being referred to as the embodiment of Glohm. However we have explicit confirmation that he is not directly responsible for spite bulbs and they are a way to produce glohm so he isn't the source of all of it.

This isn't fundamentally necessary for the scaling however all we really need to prove is he creates and maintains the dream worlds in fact he supposed prepares them himself.
Anyone can be the embodiment of something; that doesn't mean they have to be the sole creator of that one thing. Philemon in the Persona series is an embodiment of humanity's collective good, but that doesn't mean they're the creator of good. That same rule applies to Reclusa; he can be the embodiment of Glohm, but it doesn't mean he has to be the creator of it. It's normal for characters in fiction to be an embodiment of something and also not the creator of it.
That doesn't matter because we have this claim "He is stated to be capable of eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse, furthering him scaling to all of Bonds beyond him being its equal." That link says something a bit different it says he'll do it again and again implying he won't actually destroy all bonds, at least all at once so scaling to the Pure Hearts which also amplify the power of love is questionable he also goes about eradicating bonds in a particular way, trapping people in dreams and leaving the rest to hopelessly suffer this works great because bonds don't automatically protect themselves the members of the bond have to actively try to work for or with the bond at bare minimum which this usually prevents.
The bonds in the blog are the "source of existence" have "infinite power", and hold together not just the land of Concordia, but beyond it. Similarly, the Pure Hearts serve as the counterpart to the Chaos Heart, which was going to destroy all the universes and existence. We scale the two to each other in this instance because they operate on a similar existential level.
This isn't fundamentally necessary for the scaling however all we really need to prove is he creates and maintains the dream worlds in fact he supposed prepares them himself.
If he prepares them himself, then that should mean, in a way, he's technically creating them. Just maybe via something like preparation.
 
Gotcha, I'd still like to see it though.
I'll get on that. Grampy Turnip context?
I'm not denying it can happen to Goombas and such, I'm questioning whether it's happening in that scene specifically. Bowser's Inside Story is very inconsistent about Bowser's strength, could just be a low end showing for him.
Fair
Well I don't think you've actually shown anything that says it's all friendship/teamwork/whatever and that any use of that is inherently invoking Bonds. It's a universal force of some kind sure, so I don't think it's an unreasonable interpretation, but at the same time if you're trying to upscale Brothership from any other showing of this kind ofbut power of friendship thing you'd probably want clear statements.
Not necessarily trying to upscale anything that happens in Brothership other than Reclusa himself for being the "other Legendary" to Bonds, just showing that it comes from the same source, which it certainly does. After all, everything is made of Bonds, and the Bonds of only a few people can create an entire Multiverse.

I'm that sense, Reclusa is impressive for being able to deny these Bonds, don't forget Galaxy and Culex telling us Bonds outscale Time and Space in order to stay connected!
Explicit would be if they said "we're using Bonds here". Anyways, that's just a nitpick, don't mind it.
Kk!
I don't really need to align my claims with Lou's, we're not arguing together we both just happen to disagree. But I dunno, "bad guy dies and stuff related to them falls apart" is a pretty common trope, it doesn't really imply conceptual existence (and if it did beating up Reclusa's physical form wouldn't actually do anything to affect the very concept of Glohm itself, but I digress). All of Ganon's Gloom disappears after he's defeated in TotK, Ganondorf's tower crumbles in Ocarina of Time after you take him down, Dracula's castle usually falls to pieces in Castlevania, the planet's core collapses when Sephiroth is defeated in FF7, even Mother Brain flips a dead man's switch on a planetary bomb... obviously this is different but other than "Reclusa had control over Glohm" it doesn't really show much, and we knew that already.
I know, it's just that Reclusa and everything related to Glohm disappears at the exact same time, in the exact same way
We had a whole thread going back and forth about this. I still stand by the position that he doesn't really do that.
Like, in the end, he would at least prevent them from being created by countering and destroying the infinite energy from Bonds that creates them, which should scale similarly.
No but that doesn't change anything. There's a lot more issues to scaling him to all the Glohm than just him being its direct source. He needs to be capable of fully drawing upon its power at a moment's notice in a fight, and everything else in the UES.
He did so when he created the Soli-tree, he just used the power in a different way


He still uses plenty during the fight, remember that it allows him to do EVERYTHING he does.
Literally every instance of him making the worlds is evidence of such, given he needs to put them in a matrix-style "lotus eater machine" of sorts which screws with their heads. Your arguments against that have basically consisted of trying to prove that Reclusa can freely edit and create dreams which is true... as long as they're in the flowers and he can mess with their brains.
I really think it would be worth me looking further into his "preparation" statement, as that would necessitate them being created at the same time as the Soli-tree, which I've suggested before.
 
Reclusa being the source of all Glohm is based on him being referred to as the embodiment of Glohm. However we have explicit confirmation that he is not directly responsible for spite bulbs and they are a way to produce glohm so he isn't the source of all of it.
Not just the statement but also his actions, remember that we hear nothing of Glohm being a thing before his egg was found and Zokket was made.

Pretty sure Spite Bulbs were only a thing after he came into the picture too, will need to check that.
This isn't fundamentally necessary for the scaling however all we really need to prove is he creates and maintains the dream worlds in fact he supposed prepares them himself.
Yep
Now I have been hopping in and out of the discussion previously for a bit so just to double check they are confirmed to be sleeping dreams, right? They are referred to as dreams once and are otherwise referred to as fantasies, and as someone's own world, both phrases usually reserved for daydreaming which I don't think creates worlds in Mario. Dream also refers to desires and the scenarios basically always exist to fulfill such desires. Characters consistently talk clearly while inside them unlike normal sleep talking and they also aren't ever referred to as falling asleep from what I seen.
They have the Glohm speech bubble, so it could honestly be the flowers talking, especially considering that we can hear their voices through laughter are digitized and sound nothing like them.
That whole tangent aside dreams he creates a lot of them. However we don't know how many at a time which is kinda important because that's how our rules work. Of course that wouldn't matter if the dreams were actively being substained the blog says it substains stuff but gives no further explanation. It is probably because all of this that definitely implies that's a thing. I don't think that proves the dreams were destroyed only the flowers trapping them. One could argue the fact they left these dreams that they weren't willing to suggests that the dream went with the flower. However they transformed into bond energy which basically serves to connect people which could explain it or the fall and disconnect from the flower forcefully woke them up and the dream still exists. Speaking of which the idea a dream needs to be substained is fundamentally different from pretty much every other dream world in the series making it questionable if they should be treated the same as normal dreams.
If he prepared them as he says, they'd all have been made at the same time, when he made the Soli-tree.
That doesn't matter because we have this claim "He is stated to be capable of eradicating all Bonds from the multiverse, furthering him scaling to all of Bonds beyond him being its equal." That link says something a bit different it says he'll do it again and again implying he won't actually destroy all bonds, at least all at once so scaling to the Pure Hearts which also amplify the power of love is questionable he also goes about eradicating bonds in a particular way, trapping people in dreams and leaving the rest to hopelessly suffer this works great because bonds don't automatically protect themselves the members of the bond have to actively try to work for or with the bond at bare minimum which this usually prevents. Also where is he stated to be its equal.
He doesn't need the flowers. He just does it so he wouldn't have to bother, but he has and can do it himself.

He's it's equal by concept (equal emotion to Bonds displays equal power), statements, and displays of power, in game and in the past.
 
Anyone can be the embodiment of something; that doesn't mean they have to be the sole creator of that one thing. Philemon in the Persona series is an embodiment of humanity's collective good, but that doesn't mean they're the creator of good. That same rule applies to Reclusa; he can be the embodiment of Glohm, but it doesn't mean he has to be the creator of it. It's normal for characters in fiction to be an embodiment of something and also not the creator of it.
It is literally part of the blog's claims if it's wrong it's wrong simple as that such points are irrelevant
This is the relevant claim
The bonds in the blog are the "source of existence" have "infinite power", and hold together not just the land of Concordia, but beyond it. Similarly, the Pure Hearts serve as the counterpart to the Chaos Heart, which was going to destroy all the universes and existence. We scale the two to each other in this instance because they operate on a similar existential level.
Yeah, but he still shouldn't scale to the highest end based on his methodology.
If he prepares them himself, then that should mean, in a way, he's technically creating them. Just maybe via something like preparation.
this isn't me arguing against it yet.
Not just the statement but also his actions, remember that we hear nothing of Glohm being a thing before his egg was found and Zokket was made.
That doesn't seem definitive just not having people mention it.
Pretty sure Spite Bulbs were only a thing after he came into the picture too, will need to check that.
They were seemingly known of before hand also we have a clear explanation for why they transformed because a lack of connectar they had to run on their own energy.
They have the Glohm speech bubble, so it could honestly be the flowers talking, especially considering that we can hear their voices through laughter are digitized and sound nothing like them.
I guess I thought I saw glohm particles around them so I assumed that was it plus they are talking from a first person perspective
If he prepared them as he says, they'd all have been made at the same time, when he made the Soli-tree
Why? The flowers aren't all shown capturing people all at once.
He doesn't need the flowers. He just does it so he wouldn't have to bother, but he has and can do it himself.
I guess this could be explained differently in Japanese but English implies he usually uses the flowers and that quote could just be him being over confident he could of learned about it a plethora of ways and also he gets smoked like that is an important thing that happens.
 
I have work soon, so I will explain what we have support for in this thread. But we should stay on topic as ArmorChompy's reasonable request, other upgrade ideas should be saved for later. But I do think we more or less have enough support to basically revise Mario cast to have tier formats similar to the likes of Superman. At the moment, Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-B at peak is what we have enough support for regarding Mario and Luigi. Upgrades for the "Normally" can be proposed in a different thread once this one has been concluded; as I am already aware of the Mario Galaxy ones. Reclusa's interpretations are still considered too vague and mostly range and hax via corruption. UES or not, there isn't evidence of like a 2-A raw destruction feat. Chaos Hearts are actually implied opposite, as in the Power Up is well above the peaks of Mario and Luigi. But Mario and Luigi having more amps compared to when they faced Dreamy Bowser facing Reclusa seems reasonablish.
 
I have work soon, so I will explain what we have support for in this thread. But we should stay on topic as ArmorChompy's reasonable request, other upgrade ideas should be saved for later. But I do think we more or less have enough support to basically revise Mario cast to have tier formats similar to the likes of Superman. At the moment, Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-B at peak is what we have enough support for regarding Mario and Luigi. Upgrades for the "Normally" can be proposed in a different thread once this one has been concluded; as I am already aware of the Mario Galaxy ones. Reclusa's interpretations are still considered too vague and mostly range and hax via corruption. UES or not, there isn't evidence of like a 2-A raw destruction feat. Chaos Hearts are actually implied opposite, as in the Power Up is well above the peaks of Mario and Luigi. But Mario and Luigi having more amps compared to when they faced Dreamy Bowser facing Reclusa seems reasonablish.
That makes sense, also:
No because I don't think the dream stuff scales to him, but if you want to rate him as Low 2-C with an kind of indirect ED at this point I don't really mind.
Reclusa would get low 2-C, or 2-B?
 
That doesn't seem definitive just not having people mention it.
We have to acknowledge the context behind this too. Dangerous force that is based on a virus shows up out of nowhere the moment a mysterious entity pops up, and vanishes after his death
They were seemingly known of before hand also we have a clear explanation for why they transformed because a lack of connectar they had to run on their own energy.
And I'm pretty sure that losing connectar didn't do Jack before Reclusa's egg entered the picture
I guess I thought I saw glohm particles around them so I assumed that was it plus they are talking from a first person perspective
True, but I heavily believe it's simply the flowers broadcasting their thoughts based on the info I gave
Why? The flowers aren't all shown capturing people all at once.
They grow in the Soli-tree, and Reclusa claims he prepared them AFTER they latch on to everyone, implying setup upon creation. There are a few more factors to show this, along with Reclusa requiring the Bros to enter a door-portal upon each "update" to their world.
I guess this could be explained differently in Japanese but English implies he usually uses the flowers and that quote could just be him being over confident he could of learned about it a plethora of ways and also he gets smoked like that is an important thing that happens.
Japanese is prioritized, and he has done this before. He also didn't LEARN about Bonds, he fought against them
 
And I'm pretty sure that losing connectar didn't do Jack before Reclusa's egg entered the picture
I don't think that's true why would Connie know of them otherwise.
They grow in the Soli-tree, and Reclusa claims he prepared them AFTER they latch on to everyone, implying setup upon creation. There are a few more factors to show this, along with Reclusa requiring the Bros to enter a door-portal upon each "update" to their world.
okay I mean sure.
Japanese is prioritized, and he has done this before. He also didn't LEARN about Bonds, he fought against them
In order of claims I know I don't have access to an entire translation of the original text so I am going mostly off the hopefully not completely inaccurate English version of the story, that is not even close to what he actually says that is at most a possible but unproven he also gets defeated. Lastly, not definitive.
 
I don't think that's true why would Connie know of them otherwise.
She was put into power after Cozette went missing (and became Zokket)

So she's essentially THE Bond researcher
In order of claims I know I don't have access to an entire translation of the original text so I am going mostly off the hopefully not completely inaccurate English version of the story, that is not even close to what he actually says that is at most a possible but unproven he also gets defeated. Lastly, not definitive.
This is the first and only time Bonds have, would, and could ever defeat him. I'm saying
that he's fought against Bonds, has won hundreds of times before, and this is all from the Japanese script
 
It is literally part of the blog's claims if it's wrong it's wrong simple as that such points are irrelevant

Yeah, but he still shouldn't scale to the highest end based on his methodology.

this isn't me arguing against it yet.
The Bonds have infinite power, and infinite power of one thing on the FAQ page puts that thing at High 3-A. The Bonds hold the Super Mario Cosmology together, which is 2-A. Reclusa preparing the worlds with the Glohm is him, in a way, creating the worlds. He is feeding on the "lonely feelings" of Concordia, refining them into Glohm. The Soli-Tree was made by Reclusa with the Glohm, and he merges with that same tree to become Weeping Reclusa. He is battling against the Mario Bros both with the Glohm, and when he dies, he deeply affects the substance. Furthermore, it's stated that he would destroy these Bonds again and again, meaning he has the capability to destroy the Bonds.

The UES part of the page states:
In order to qualify for a Universal Energy System and do scaling according to it, a character or the system they are using needs to fulfill all criteria for a Non-physical Energy System. Additionally, they have to demonstrate that they can channel their power through their own bodies in a way that quantifiably enhances them or otherwise allows scaling of their supernatural powers through their physicals. Hence there should be evidence that an increase in power / energy should correspond to a proportional increase in the potency of their physical statistics. In the rare case that it is relevant for scaling the reverse should also be demonstrated: That a feat of non-empowered physical strength applies to the amount of supernatural power. Visual evidence of amplification is not considered necessary.

Ergo, the Glohm and Reclusa should scale to the Bonds, which are at the very least Low 2-C to at most 2-A.
 
Last edited:
Again that is not actually said in the text you provided.
Okay, fought against Bonds is this scan, win is the fact that he's still evidently alive during the games events

Recall that Bonds exist in every dimension

And

"The power of Bonds? Feels like that rings a bell..."
"Ohhh, of course. Yes, yes, I'm veeery scared."
 
He dies after that we don't even know how he learned about it
He does die after that, but I'd honestly go far as to assume he knows these things
Confirmed from experience
Maybe with the seeming night omnipotence he uses to prepare dreams and know everything about his opponents
 
Can anyone explain what's been concluded and the arguments for and against? All I know about this verse is the basic outline, so please try to put it in a way that can be understood.
 
Can anyone explain what's been concluded and the arguments for and against? All I know about this verse is the basic outline, so please try to put it in a way that can be understood.
Basically, we're arguing for 2-A Bonds which hold the Mario Bros cosmology together and are stated to have infinite power (which should be High 3-A) and scaling the Glohm and Reclusa to it, seeing as how the Mario Bros used them to defeat him.
 
I have work soon, so I will explain what we have support for in this thread. But we should stay on topic as ArmorChompy's reasonable request, other upgrade ideas should be saved for later. But I do think we more or less have enough support to basically revise Mario cast to have tier formats similar to the likes of Superman. At the moment, Varies based on Bonds, High 6-A normally, up to 2-B at peak is what we have enough support for regarding Mario and Luigi. Upgrades for the "Normally" can be proposed in a different thread once this one has been concluded; as I am already aware of the Mario Galaxy ones. Reclusa's interpretations are still considered too vague and mostly range and hax via corruption. UES or not, there isn't evidence of like a 2-A raw destruction feat. Chaos Hearts are actually implied opposite, as in the Power Up is well above the peaks of Mario and Luigi. But Mario and Luigi having more amps compared to when they faced Dreamy Bowser facing Reclusa seems reasonablish.
This is for another thread as you said but honestly Mario & Luigi's max tier together shouldn't scale to their standalnoe max, they're just stronger when together.
I'll get on that. Grampy Turnip context?
Yes
Not necessarily trying to upscale anything that happens in Brothership other than Reclusa himself for being the "other Legendary" to Bonds, just showing that it comes from the same source, which it certainly does. After all, everything is made of Bonds, and the Bonds of only a few people can create an entire Multiverse.
I disagree with just assuming Reclusa can upscale from the Pure Hearts. We don't know which method they were made with, even if you say it's Bonds that doesn't mean they're just using that baseline of power rather than some other mechanism unknown to us.
I'm that sense, Reclusa is impressive for being able to deny these Bonds, don't forget Galaxy and Culex telling us Bonds outscale Time and Space in order to stay connected!
This isn't really quantifiable, it's range if anything.
I know, it's just that Reclusa and everything related to Glohm disappears at the exact same time, in the exact same way
That doesn't really change things, you can't directly draw a link between that and UES scaling regardless of how it's portrayed to happen.
Like, in the end, he would at least prevent them from being created.
This also isn't stated anywhere. You're assuming a lot of specifics about the nature of the multiverse, Reclusa's knowledge of that nature and his ability to affect it.
He did so when he created the Soli-tree, he just used the power in a different way
Which means there is no implication he can do that in a fight.

I'm sorry if it seems I'm stonewalling but truly I don't think there is much consistent information here. You need pretty solid proof of scaling to validate a huge upgrade and things such as "Reclusa upscales from the Pure Hearts" or "Reclusa can counteract tier 2 Bond effects" are already conjecture, when you put it together with questionable UES scaling I can't really approve this.
He still uses plenty during the fight, remember that it allows him to do EVERYTHING he does.
"Plenty" is infinities less than a tier 2 feat (which again I don't agree is even happening), it's like saying a character can scale to a tier 5 power source because he used it to break down a door.
I really think it would be worth me looking further into his "preparation" statement, as that would necessitate them being created at the same time as the Soli-tree, which I've suggested before.
If you want.
 
I think Bonds being 2-A is cool, but right now I’m not sure about Reclusa and Gholm, as well as the Bros, being able to scale to 2-A. I want to wait for more points to be concluded before deciding.
What if we gave the Mario Bros a 2-A Bonds key and Reclusa a 2-A Weeping Reclusa key?
 
This is for another thread as you said but honestly Mario & Luigi's max tier together shouldn't scale to their standalnoe max, they're just stronger when together.
I don't think the Bros. scale to ALL THE BONDS that make up the verse, but rather enough to counter Reclusa's destruction and power, which is at least 2-C.
I'll get to it.
I disagree with just assuming Reclusa can upscale from the Pure Hearts. We don't know which method they were made with, even if you say it's Bonds that doesn't mean they're just using that baseline of power rather than some other mechanism unknown to us.
The Pure Hearts are concentrations of Bonds,
This isn't really quantifiable, it's range if anything.
Okay.
That doesn't really change things, you can't directly draw a link between that and UES scaling regardless of how it's portrayed to happen.
I guess so? The point is that he sustains Glohm. Just wondering, do you agree or disagree with that, and why?
This also isn't stated anywhere. You're assuming a lot of specifics about the nature of the multiverse, Reclusa's knowledge of that nature and his ability to affect it.
Well we know that Bonds create the multiverse, so him destroying them would inevitably destroy a power source capable of making worlds, so it doesn't matter whether or not he really knows that. What's important is that Bonds are the source of everything, including dimensions and dream worlds, and he's capable of suppressing such power.

Keep in mind Cozette was speaking in the context of the Bonds of one universe creating a multiverse by spreading out.
Hence why Bonds are 2-A. Reclusa is notably the only character capable of completely erasing Bonds.
The Culex and Galaxy statements are there to remind us that Bonds bypass Space and Time to stay together.
Which means there is no implication he can do that in a fight.

I'm sorry if it seems I'm stonewalling but truly I don't think there is much consistent information here. You need pretty solid proof of scaling to validate a huge upgrade and things such as "Reclusa upscales from the Pure Hearts" or "Reclusa can counteract tier 2 Bond effects" are already conjecture, when you put it together with questionable UES scaling I can't really approve this.
I mean, he does fight them with the Soli-tree in an unwinnable battle, the Bros. need to enter inside it to avoid fighting Weeping Reclusa. So he did use Soli-tree in a fight, which is a battle you're actively encouraged to avoid.

Keep in mind all of this is while Reclusa is controlling all the dreams of his victims through the Soli-tree's flowers.
"Plenty" is infinities less than a tier 2 feat (which again I don't agree is even happening), it's like saying a character can scale to a tier 5 power source because he used it to break down a door.
I see what you're saying here.
If you want.
K
 
My thought was Low 2-C because the dreams are made individually, he can just do it a bunch.
Just wondering, would Low 2-C, possibly 2-B work, depending on what I get from looking into the Japanese context of the preparation statement?

I'd be happy with 2-C though, as that's the minimum of what he's shown to do in the game ^^ Thank you!
 
I essentially agree with DDM here.

The staff thread on UES isn't technically concluded, but in that discussion I also leaned more towards the side of being less strict.

Still, if something major changes there with our standards I'll obviously have to re-evaluate my opinion here and anyone is welcome to let me know if that's the case.
 
I would presume that it would be that the Mario Cosmology is 2-A; although I don't know if that is still the case on this wiki.
It would be that. Bonds as a whole blatantly scale to the cosmology, but every Bond user does not. I was scaling Reclusa to it as Bonds come from people, Glohm comes from him.

Strongest Bond user (the cosmology) vs strongest Glohm user Reclusa that are implied to be equal forces, loneliness power and togetherness power.
 
It would be that. Bonds as a whole blatantly scale to the cosmology, but every Bond user does not. I was scaling Reclusa to it as Bonds come from people, Glohm comes from him.

Strongest Bond user (the cosmology) vs strongest Glohm user Reclusa that are implied to be equal forces, loneliness power and togetherness power.
Oh, unrelated to this topic exactly, but I feel I should bring up that Peach and Starlow used Bonds to bust the Dream Stone into bits. Don't forget that Dreamy Luigi beat it's spirit up earlier with Bonds (Bros attack + Luiginoids + the nature of Dreamy Luigi revealed in Dream's Deep. In a tutorial battle nonetheless

(Wow Dream Team really was kinda crazy, huh?)
 
2-A can be justified since the Mushroom Kingdom’s wishes in PM64 could empower the Star Spirits to overcome the Star Rod after it was empowered to surpass them

And since star power/wish power would be included in this as a UES, you could scale 2-A (Dream Depot) to the Star Spirits who created it with that UES < Star Rod < Star Spirits w/ Mushroom Kingdom’s bond-power, so a whole kingdom’s bond-energy can make a 2-A thing more powerful which would mean it’s not finite relative to it

Reclusa would at minimum scale to a whole kingdom’s worth of bond-power, Dreamy Bowser potentially as well
 
2-A can be justified since the Mushroom Kingdom’s wishes in PM64 could empower the Star Spirits to overcome the Star Rod after it was empowered to surpass them

And since star power/wish power would be included in this as a UES, you could scale 2-A (Dream Depot) to the Star Spirits who created it with that UES < Star Rod < Star Spirits w/ Mushroom Kingdom’s bond-power, so a whole kingdom’s bond-energy can make a 2-A thing more powerful which would mean it’s not finite relative to it
This, too, is true
 
Oh, unrelated to this topic exactly, but I feel I should bring up that Peach and Starlow used Bonds to bust the Dream Stone into bits. Don't forget that Dreamy Luigi beat it's spirit up earlier with Bonds (Bros attack + Luiginoids + the nature of Dreamy Luigi revealed in Dream's Deep. In a tutorial battle nonetheless

(Wow Dream Team really was kinda crazy, huh?)
Dream Stone doesn’t need 2-B durability or whatever to be 2-B in utilizing a UES
 
2-A can be justified since the Mushroom Kingdom’s wishes in PM64 could empower the Star Spirits to overcome the Star Rod after it was empowered to surpass them

And since star power/wish power would be included in this as a UES, you could scale 2-A (Dream Depot) to the Star Spirits who created it with that UES < Star Rod < Star Spirits w/ Mushroom Kingdom’s bond-power, so a whole kingdom’s bond-energy can make a 2-A thing more powerful which would mean it’s not finite relative to it

Reclusa would at minimum scale to a whole kingdom’s worth of bond-power, Dreamy Bowser potentially as well
the split hasn't been undone the paper world still isn't the normal universe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top