- 1,339
- 2,506
Erasing the Concept of Eternity ≠ Negation of Immortality type-1Type 1: (Can kill beings that possess eternal life and can erase any concept, and therefore can erase the concept of eternity within the work.)
The former is entails erasure of a concept whereas the implication behind the negation of the latter is ageing someone to death.
So it's not a negation, cool we agree.It’s not that he exceeds their tolerance—no one can survive the injuries he inflicts
Lots of yap without addressing what I said also blatant NLFType 3: (Can kill characters that can regenerate from nothing, and he has done so—they could not regenerate. Likewise, even high-level divine regeneration won’t help, because once Yogiri decides to kill, they will not return. So the level of divine regeneration, whether high or low, does not matter; anyone he kills is finished.)
Type 4: (Clear)
Correct no character should possess "Immortality Negation Type-8" without specifying the limitations and the types of Immortality. I suggest re-reading what I said it really helps especially the bolded sections.Types 8 and 9: (Clear) but you said he cannot negate characters who embody H1A level, haha. I’ve never heard this joke, and I don’t think anyone could understand what you mean here. Therefore, no character should possess Immortality Negation Type 8.
TLDR; Killing someone ≠ Necessarily negating their Immortalities
Negation of Immortality should be followed up with a proper explanation on what it entails - the mechanism behind it and the obvious limitations.
Now I will stop here and wait for staff.
think