- 11,982
- 4,826
- Thread starter
- #2,841
Yeah i can't find anything myself, so while it was a good effort, nothing we can do.I guess superheated particles is not enough evidence for support of sub-atomization
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah i can't find anything myself, so while it was a good effort, nothing we can do.I guess superheated particles is not enough evidence for support of sub-atomization
Cool more High 8-C madness on here. Also, you should try to get Tricky throwing a building accepted, was that calc wrong or just never accepted?Y'know i just realized couldn't everyone get upgraded to Class K via this? That's a pretty blatant Class K feat according to the common feats page.
Also, this calc got accepted.
I thought tricky's calc was always accepted, it just was never put on the profiles since nodody really scaled to it beyond Tricky himself. I'd have to see the calc again.Cool more High 8-C madness on here. Also, you should try to get Tricky throwing a building accepted, was that calc wrong or just never accepted?
Shouldn't Deimos & Sanford scale? They survived the building falling on themI thought tricky's calc was always accepted, it just was never put on the profiles since nodody really scaled to it beyond Tricky himself. I'd have to see the calc again.
They originally did a while ago, but it was removed from profiles as the calc didn't take into account the fact they wouldn't be withstanding all the energy from the building falling onto them and would realistically be a lot lower for the energy they're withstanding.Shouldn't Deimos & Sanford scale? They survived the building falling on them
I see.They originally did a while ago, but it was removed from profiles as the calc didn't take into account the fact they wouldn't be withstanding all the energy from the building falling onto them and would realistically be a lot lower for the energy they're withstanding.
Scrapeface blows up building
Is there any feats for the fodder characters you want calced? Currently doing some to try and crack down on a tier to put Engineers.
I got Class 100 for him lifting the building. now to do the explosion itself.Scrapeface blows up building
Okay redoing it ANOTHER WAY is giving me about Building to City-Block+ levels depending on the route you go for it.I got Class 100 for him lifting the building. now to do the explosion itself.
I have no idea what i'm doing for the actual explosion bit.
Edit: 0.01 ton. That's twice as weak as the thing Scrapeface scales to in the first place. What. I think i did something wrong.
Isn't Early Hank 9-A?So we got 9-B Soldats (They kinda scaled to Early hank due to being at the very least comparable to hofnarr, but it's good supporting evidence) and we have 8-C to 8-B Scrapeface via dying.
yes. Soldats scale to Hofnarr since they're supposed to be advanced soldiers and should be superior to the essentially regular dude who can harm hank and nexus core units.Isn't Early Hank 9-A?
I haven’t even started it yet lol.Will you post the dissonance killing mag agent calc?
Here (10:57), although you should be very generous to interpret this as "millions years worth of combat experience"Does anyone have the scan of sleepwalkers having millions years of experience?
They get their training from "the original s-3lf", a potential Generation 01, hence the millions years of experience.Does anyone have the scan of sleepwalkers having millions years of experience?
Ah. I see. Is there a scan that confirms 1v02p6 is a G01?They get their training from "the original s-3lf", a potential Generation 01, hence the millions years of experience.
Mostly Christoff's line stating he was the "first S-3LF"Ah. I see. Is there a scan that confirms 1v02p6 is a G01?
I remember from some blog that stated Sleepwalkers can process a lifetime worth of memories in an instant, and they calculated that to relativistic. It might not be viable and up for debate, but I'm curious to see the results if someone were to attempt to calc processing millions of years in an instant.Mostly Christoff's line stating he was the "first S-3LF"
I believe he can also upgrade his stats similar to G01s, so it's a safe assumption i'd say.
Didn't the clones who processed a lifetime of memories go insane?I remember from some blog that stated Sleepwalkers can process a lifetime worth of memories in an instant, and they calculated that to relativistic. It might not be viable and up for debate, but I'm curious to see the results if someone were to attempt to calc processing millions of years in an instant.
It wasn't referring to sleepwalkers?Didn't the clones who processed a lifetime of memories go insane?
i don't recall the full statement, but i recall them changing it so that clones would take in the memories over the course of months so they didn't go insane or something.It wasn't referring to sleepwalkers?
Injecting too much of S-3LFs with memory in the short time frame causes subjects to mutate into Abominationsi don't recall the full statement, but i recall them changing it so that clones would take in the memories over the course of months so they didn't go insane or something.
You mean something like a hypertimeline?I think we can easily argue both The Machine and The Maker being Low 1-C even without that 5D Krinkels statement via The Machine containing 3 various space times
I have a blog on Fictional Indexing Wiki with the Prime Code scans, (surprisingly it uses the least amount of wog) also shouldn't it be 1-A?
Okay, I started doing Prime Blade's page. I didn't fully complete its page yet and don't even hope of it being quickly accepted, as it has controversial scaling and abilities, but still)
Sure, I won't be against it.I have a blog on Fictional Indexing Wiki with the Prime Code scans, (surprisingly it uses the least amount of wog) also shouldn't it be 1-A?
It at the very least has R>F over Low 1-C realms, so i don't see how it's entirely avoidable. it's either going to be Low 1-A or straight up 1-A. not exactly avoidable.Sure, I won't be against it.
I'm being honest, 1-A Madness franchise sounds worse and worse the more I thonk about it (at least through R>F)
The only other way is wog. Or using employers and machine defining literal concepts but that's kind of hard to explainWe shouldn't try to use R>F.