I get your point, but it doesn’t really change the fact that it’s still a King Kong incarnation. Because of that, it’s listed on the King Kong verse page alongside the other versions of the character.
Without crossovers, the King Kong verse peaks at at least Low 7-C to 7-C, likely 6-C; with crossovers, it reaches 2-C.
I get what you mean, but King Kong is a bit different. His versions are usually treated more like different takes on the same character rather than being tied to one strict canon, kind of like Godzilla. Because of that, it’s easier to group them together when talking about the verse.
Actually Disney should peak at T1 here since they own Sora and the rest of the KH original characters.
Toy Story profiles be like:
The one exception for KH shenanigans lmao
So it’s not considered canon just because Kong pulls planes out of nowhere? That feels a bit arbitrary. I also think it’s worth considering the explanation that every incarnation of Godzilla and Kong can be treated as part of their canon, regardless of the creator or the medium they appear in.
Yeah, I agree. Godzilla and Kong have always had over-the-top moments, that’s just part of their characters.
What are you talking about? Godzilla and Kong are clearly the most serious, dark, and edgy characters ever!
I already said it’s up to you:
A significant number of users prefer to keep the Kong verse unified rather than splitting it.
Actually, Castlevania Kong is also a Konami Kong, since Castlevania is a Konami property and these games were made during the period when Konami held the rights to use King Kong in video games.
Is there actual info/scans supporting this? Having a license doesn't necessarily indicate an unified canon.
...??? I don't think you got my point. I didn't say they're the same King Kong; I said that Castlevania Kong is also a Konami Kong. It's like saying Godzilla 2000 is also a Toho Godzilla. There's no canon merging anywhere in there. lol
Y'know, usually this kind of attitude doesn't lead anywhere good for users in this community... xD
ID should be 1-C based on recent changes
I separated the King Kong verse for organizational purposes, as each represents a distinct continuity with its own scaling.
I understand, but what about characters with ‘Varies’ tiers or ‘+’ ratings? If everything is grouped under a single tier (e.g., 9-A), how would those distinctions be represented?
+ Rankings are top of certain tier, I would put those in same tier but as bolded plus. Varies I think I put to lowest first.
I understand the idea, but I’m not sure how the distinctions would actually be represented in practice. If everything is grouped under a single tier like 9-A or 8-C, and so on, how would I properly include ratings like ‘+’ or more complex ones like ‘At least Town level, likely Island level, possibly Universe level’? Those don’t fit cleanly into a single tier listing.
I agree with Apex that, in these cases, the most practical approach is to use a format like [Verse] - [Tier], as it’s unlikely people will consistently create separate titles for every ‘Varies’ tier or ‘+’ rating.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Cocoon is still High 1-C (which is why Scoopsie specified Hi3 and not HSR hehe)
