- 12,096
- 4,870
- Thread starter
- #161
bumper
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Per the FAQThats the tricky part about those who are supposed to be 1-A but can't be 1-A due to Anti-feat. I think they can be Low 1-C but i am not sure. I will have to consult other staffs regarding it.
@Planck69 @Qawsedf234 @DontTalkDT @Vietthai96
Your opinion on the thread will be appreciated.
The first practical effect of this fact is that the power of a 1-A character cannot be dispersed so much that it reaches into a lower tier. Since there is no conceivable extension of any lower tier that can yield equality to a 1-A structure, neither can there be any subdivision (Even an infinite subdivision) of 1-A that reduces down into such tiers. Unless, of course, this division is somehow non-quantitative in nature (i.e. The results of the division are not actually numerical "chunks" of the character's power); however, this should be made reasonably clear by statements or through background context.
Secondly, a 1-A level cannot be attained by a process in which the lower level quantitatively "adds up" to itself to break through into the higher one, due to the total lack of structural continuity between the two; the higher level cannot be attained, nor expressed by, any expansions of the lower one, and therefore things from the latter cannot interfere with the former by means of their own lower existences. Put simply: A non-1-A cannot reach the level of 1-A by appealing to another non-1-A
A character cannot lower themselves to not be 1-A. It has to be an avatar or have a clear in-universe background context that would suggest something.However, if the "power source" in question consists in a lower character literally overwhelming a would-be 1-A object with their own abilities and forcibly absorbing it into themselves, then that constitutes an anti-feat, unless the occasion falls under the stipulations above.
He already explained. The Machine created The Auditor and The Machine controls him. The Maker is unbounded by the things The Machine defines completelyPer the FAQ
A character cannot lower themselves to not be 1-A. It has to be an avatar or have a clear in-universe background context that would suggest something.
If someone is affected by a non-1-A object, they themselves would not be 1-A unless there's a reasonable explanation for it.
The only thing I see from the OP is this partHe already explained.
Which are all still anti-feats for a 1-A characterAnd The Maker directly states they can't be affected by The Machine.
It's not until The Machine's redefinition that The Machine becomes powerful enough to potentially affect the maker.
This isn't an anti-feat of The Maker since he objectively does have a reality-fiction transcendence to the series, even to The Machine. It's a feat of The Machine that was previously fiction to The Maker getting strong enough to potentially affect The Maker.
Both have 1-A scaling though, borderline the exact same kind of scaling since they have nearly the same exact feats. A 1-A affecting a 1-A isn't an anti-feat. They both exist on the same plane of existence. The Maker even implies they do, as they say it's contradictory for them to be able to control The Machine without being affected by it.Which are all still anti-feats for a 1-A character
Wait im confused. I thought The Maker was superior and above The Machine? Because the text says The Maker is unbounded by The MachineBoth have 1-A scaling though, borderline the exact same kind of scaling since they have nearly the same exact feats. A 1-A affecting a 1-A isn't an anti-feat. They both exist on the same plane of existence. The Maker even implies they do, as they say it's contradictory for them to be able to control The Machine without being affected by it.
The Auditor being given a snippit of The Machine isn't an anti-feat either, since the game specifies the snippit is still higher dimensional, infinite, and indescribable compared to the beings who have access to it, and only have access to it because the 1-A sent it's stewards to give it to them.
We have a whole cosmology blog in the OP that explains the scaling.
![]()
Madness Combat Cosmology Blog
vsbattles.fandom.com
The maker is unbound from the machine’s system because the maker is above the things the machine defines. (All things exist apart of the machine EXCEPT The maker)Wait im confused. I thought The Maker was superior and above The Machine? Because the text says The Maker is unbounded by The Machine
Truth bombOwnage: 100%
The Maker can’t be higher dimensional than the machine, since even before the madness was messing with the machine the machine could still theoretically affect The Maker (had the maker not just been able to ignore that)Okay, I have a proposition for the 1-A scaling. What if we say The Machine is baseline 1-A and Maker is 1 layer due to not being bounded by The Machine. The Machine should have a rating like this "1-A, can potentially become higher", the "potentially become higher" refers to The Machine absorbing The Maker and it becomes 1 layer into 1-A. Since The Maker implies that The Machine is infected by The Madness, and says that The Machine is getting closer to The Madness and grows stronger, eventually posing an actual threat to The Maker
Yeah but the rating & explanation i'm proposing can potentially clear all contentions/anti-feats for the 1-A scaling. Since The Maker lost it's control over The Machine, and The Maker says something about The Machine's redefinition gets it closer to The MadnessThe Maker can’t be higher dimensional than the machine, since even before the madness was messing with the machine the machine could still theoretically affect The Maker (had the maker not just been able to ignore that)
The Machine itself is blatantly 1-A with its feats, The Maker made said 1-A structure. Maker scales to Machine due to that. (With their own feats) the scaling is just that
You’d need proof from the game that’s how it works.Yeah but the rating & explanation i'm proposing can potentially clear all contentions/anti-feats for the 1-A scaling. Since The Maker lost it's control over The Machine, and The Maker says something about The Machine's redefinition gets it closer to The Madness
I mean The Maker himself says he is unbounded by The Machine (it's the reason why he has Paraconsistent Physiology type 2 on your blog). Then Machine was messed with by The Madness, it then poses a threat to and can absorb The Maker which like would not make sense if Maker was unbounded by The Machine in the first placeYou’d need proof from the game that’s how it works.
I seeMost (if not all) the contentions for 1-A is because I’m a dumbass and said things that aren’t the case for the rating in both this thread and back when I upgraded the auditor.
Bypassing paraconsistent physiology and bypassing a whole layer of 1-A is a big difference.I mean The Maker himself says he is unbounded by The Machine (it's the reason why he has Paraconsistent Physiology type 2 on your blog). Then Machine was messed with by The Madness, it then poses a threat to and can absorb The Maker which like would not make sense if Maker was unbounded by The Machine in the first place
I'm saying The Maker gets Paraconsistent Physiology from being 1 layerBypassing paraconsistent physiology and bypassing a whole layer of 1-A is a big difference.
Yeah, but there isn’t anything in game that says that The Machine is rising up from being seen as fiction to The Maker. Without evidence, there isn’t any way you can say that’s how it works.I'm saying The Maker gets Paraconsistent Physiology from being 1 layer
I will try to work on this argument sometime thenYeah, but there isn’t anything in game that says that The Machine is rising up from being seen as fiction to The Maker. Without evidence, there isn’t any way you can say that’s how it works.