Anti feat for qualitive superiority

[Impartial_Euler]

I may have misunderstood this so correct me if I'm wrong.
So here goes, for a qualitative superior entity, it is considered an anti feat for them to enter a realm or world that is at least a quality inferior relative to themselves. Because they're irreducible to them and stuff.
My question is, why exactly is this considered an anti feat?
My perspective and conflict with this antifeat, is because Hax exists.
My analogy, dream hax and immersion for instance. An entity with certain abilities can enter an illusion/fiction equivalent realms without their parameters being reduced.
Of course if such an entity is shown to have their parameters reduced then I definitely agree on it being an anti feat.
And it may be a stretch or going off a tangent to say this, but I see it saying an entity moving in stopped time is an anti feat to time being stopped at all.

 

[Lycoris4812]

My question is, why exactly is this considered an anti feat?

Because they would immediately destroy such a space.

Magic the Gathering, a Wallet gathering game. (Part 1)

It's time to R-R-R-R-R-R-R-REVISIONNNNNNNNNN. It's been long enough. People have seen my livetweeting about my research and I've done enough to solidify for Part 1: The Planes. Strap in and strap on, we're about to get technical. This is more or less a copy-paste job of my MTG blog, so if you...

vsbattles.com

 

[Impartial_Euler]

Because they would immediately destroy such a space.

Magic the Gathering, a Wallet gathering game. (Part 1)

It's time to R-R-R-R-R-R-R-REVISIONNNNNNNNNN. It's been long enough. People have seen my livetweeting about my research and I've done enough to solidify for Part 1: The Planes. Strap in and strap on, we're about to get technical. This is more or less a copy-paste job of my MTG blog, so if you...

vsbattles.com

As I said, in the absence of Hax perhaps. If VS battle throws out Hax in favor of logic, then I have nothing to say.
Here's another analogy (perhaps should have included it from the start) using mathematics manipulation to make a 4D structure contain a 5D+ entity fully. If this is also an anti feat for the 5D+ entity, then it is what it is, my question has more or less been satisfied.

 

[FriendOfTheTeaParty]

I may have misunderstood this so correct me if I'm wrong.
So here goes, for a qualitative superior entity, it is considered an anti feat for them to enter a realm or world that is at least a quality inferior relative to themselves. Because they're irreducible to them and stuff.
My question is, why exactly is this considered an anti feat?
My perspective and conflict with this antifeat, is because Hax exists.
My analogy, dream hax and immersion for instance. An entity with certain abilities can enter an illusion/fiction equivalent realms without their parameters being reduced.
Of course if such an entity is shown to have their parameters reduced then I definitely agree on it being an anti feat.
And it may be a stretch or going off a tangent to say this, but I see it saying an entity moving in stopped time is an anti feat to time being stopped at all.

If a 1-A character can enter lower world and retain their stats even if they qualitatively reduce themselves that'd be a huge anti-feat because that means their 1-A stats are reducible to the lower reality. Only way it'd work is if they were to also lose their 1-A stats when being qualitatively reduced.

 

[SuperNova55555]

Really depends on context and how they accomplish the feat

 

[Impartial_Euler]

If a 1-A character can enter lower world and retain their stats even if they qualitatively reduce themselves that'd be a huge anti-feat because that means their 1-A stats are reducible to the lower reality. Only way it'd work is if they were to also lose their 1-A stats when being qualitatively reduced.

I see that as disregarding abilities that can make a qualitative superior entity store itself in a qualitative inferior realm. And before you say it's not logical, logic manipulation is a thing.
And from your explanation this is what I primarily understand.
•Such a thing is impossible without being an anti feat and no ability exists to makes it possible.
Or
•That is the acknowledged standard for qualitive superiority.

Really depends on context and how they accomplish the feat

So it's case by case basis?

 

[SuperNova55555]

So it's case by case basis?

Ofc