• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Are these eligible for deletion?

None of them went through the CRT proccess of them being added, dont meet the P&A requirement and contain wrong information. Though, i am reworking Kimyo page (talents will be merged into that) so maybe it can get outdated label instead?
Well tons of pages are using them, I'd suggest to make a crt for that.
 
 
Bro is huffing paint thinner

 
Bro is huffing paint thinner

Deleted. Thanks for reporting, although I'd prefer if you avoided references like that.
 
References have been required for new profiles for years at this point...
 
Genuinely on par with quality for the rest of the verse. Except the rest of the verse is literally ancient and this is a new profile from yesterday.
2020 ass profiles.
 
References have been required for new profiles for years at this point...
@Lloydblitzed plz add them
Genuinely on par with quality for the rest of the verse. Except the rest of the verse is literally ancient and this is a new profile from yesterday.
2020 ass profiles.
I'll leave instruction on their msg wall in some time, unless someone beats me to it.
 
Genuinely on par with quality for the rest of the verse. Except the rest of the verse is literally ancient and this is a new profile from yesterday.
2020 ass profiles.
Nuked the two stand alone pages, Monster Girl probably just needs a revision.
 
Extremely low effort, barebones, and scanless Digimon profiles:






(only scans are copy/pasted from other profiles with no indication of why or if they should scale to them)




Furthermore, Honeybeemon, Aegisdramon, MetalSeadramon, Espimon, Puppetmon, Takumi and Dorumon, Mayu and Kudamon, Michi and Salamon, Keito and Elecmon, Koh, Sayo, Akiho and Digitorin, Yuuya and Black, Nicolai and Sashenka, Rina and V.V., Tsurugi Tatsuno and Agumon, Hiro and Gammamon, Kiyoshiro and Jellymon, Ruli and Angoramon, Tagiru and Gumdramon, Quartzmon, Yoshino and Lalamon, and finally Meiko and Meicoomon are listed on the verse page but have no profile.

Medieval Gallantmon is listed but it goes to normal Gallantmon's page, and Neomyotismon is listed but goes to Devimon's profile.
 
Extremely low effort, barebones, and scanless Digimon profiles:






(only scans are copy/pasted from other profiles with no indication of why or if they should scale to them)




Furthermore, Honeybeemon, Aegisdramon, MetalSeadramon, Espimon, Puppetmon, Takumi and Dorumon, Mayu and Kudamon, Michi and Salamon, Keito and Elecmon, Koh, Sayo, Akiho and Digitorin, Yuuya and Black, Nicolai and Sashenka, Rina and V.V., Tsurugi Tatsuno and Agumon, Hiro and Gammamon, Kiyoshiro and Jellymon, Ruli and Angoramon, Tagiru and Gumdramon, Quartzmon, Yoshino and Lalamon, and finally Meiko and Meicoomon are listed on the verse page but have no profile.

Medieval Gallantmon is listed but it goes to normal Gallantmon's page, and Neomyotismon is listed but goes to Devimon's profile.
I mean almost all of them are very old profiles, some of them being like 10 yrs old. Wouldn't mind but they all can be reworked through crt.
What other supporters/Knowledgeable members thinks about those profiles? Have u asked in Discussion thread of verse?
 
I mean almost all of them are very old profiles, some of them being like 10 yrs old. Wouldn't mind but they all can be reworked through crt.
What other supporters/Knowledgeable members thinks about those profiles? Have u asked in Discussion thread of verse?
Digimon has a discussion thread?

The verse just went through a ton of revisions and they barely got touched so I thought it would make the most sense to just let the mods decide what to do with them.
 
 
Gave instructions and moved it to their blog.
 
I mean almost all of them are very old profiles, some of them being like 10 yrs old. Wouldn't mind but they all can be reworked through crt.
What other supporters/Knowledgeable members thinks about those profiles? Have u asked in Discussion thread of verse?
We're already working on reworked pages of all those linked profiles, including merging a few due to evolution lines.

As for the wrong links, the said Digimon forms were probably in the linked profiles before being removed in a past rework.

We'll cover all these in our next CRTs
 
We're already working on reworked pages of all those linked profiles, including merging a few due to evolution lines.

As for the wrong links, the said Digimon forms were probably in the linked profiles before being removed in a past rework.

We'll cover all these in our next CRTs
Bro can smell the word Digimon
 
Extremely low effort, barebones, and scanless Digimon profiles:






(only scans are copy/pasted from other profiles with no indication of why or if they should scale to them)




Furthermore, Honeybeemon, Aegisdramon, MetalSeadramon, Espimon, Puppetmon, Takumi and Dorumon, Mayu and Kudamon, Michi and Salamon, Keito and Elecmon, Koh, Sayo, Akiho and Digitorin, Yuuya and Black, Nicolai and Sashenka, Rina and V.V., Tsurugi Tatsuno and Agumon, Hiro and Gammamon, Kiyoshiro and Jellymon, Ruli and Angoramon, Tagiru and Gumdramon, Quartzmon, Yoshino and Lalamon, and finally Meiko and Meicoomon are listed on the verse page but have no profile.

Medieval Gallantmon is listed but it goes to normal Gallantmon's page, and Neomyotismon is listed but goes to Devimon's profile.
This should probably be addressed.
 
This should probably be addressed.
It already has, impatient one.
We're already working on reworked pages of all those linked profiles, including merging a few due to evolution lines.

As for the wrong links, the said Digimon forms were probably in the linked profiles before being removed in a past rework.

We'll cover all these in our next CRTs
 
Cool, someone with a terrible track record in getting CRTs done on time who isn't even a mod said vaguely that they were fixing it in an even later CRT. So can it actually be addressed now?
"A CRT is coming" stops profile deletions. That is sufficient addressing. Spend some time fixing the billion horrible Pokémon profiles instead please.
 
Cool, someone with a terrible track record in getting CRTs done on time who isn't even a mod said vaguely that they were fixing it in an even later CRT. So can it actually be addressed now?
On time?... on time of what? There isn't any rush dude, this is a hobby, there is no time-line anyone on this site needs to reach... all of this is purely for fun, it takes time to make things look good, so... yeah, it is going to be addressed in a later CRT, alongside other things, in fact, some profiles like Leomon were updated... so some WAS addressed, it just takes time... and that's ok
 
@Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera please calm down and lay off Reaper. Things often happen slowly on this Wiki, and when a page is updating we usually either wait or at worst put an Outdated sticker on it if the profile is particularly bad. We don't throw the whole profile away. Given you don't have a fondness for Digimon, it might be better for you to ignore it.
 
@Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera please calm down and lay off Reaper. Things often happen slowly on this Wiki, and when a page is updating we usually either wait or at worst put an Outdated sticker on it if the profile is particularly bad. We don't throw the whole profile away. Given you don't have a fondness for Digimon, it might be better for you to ignore it.
I'm an Opponent of the verse. Pointing things out like those profiles is what I do.
 
No, it doesn't, and I haven't been able to stop similar profiles from being deleted with similar arguments. He'd say anything to keep those profiles up.
OK?

And we Digimon supporters are currently working on the profiles? We also recently finished a CRT.

How does that remotely suggest the profiles be deleted?
I mean almost all of them are very old profiles, some of them being like 10 yrs old. Wouldn't mind but they all can be reworked through crt.
What other supporters/Knowledgeable members thinks about those profiles? Have u asked in Discussion thread of verse?
We recently just finished Digimon Physiology/Data Manipulation/Hellfire CRT.

If anything, one of the reasons we wanted to finish and prioritize that CRT was to make profile reworks much easier.
There should really be a Sean isn't allowed to do anything with digimon rule. His 15 year grudge because of Death Battle is stupid and malicious
I unironically agree.

This behavior of his regarding Digimon on this forum (as well as other social media) isn't the first time.

For example:


However it's understandable if staff doesn't make a rule about it. But this repeating behavior of his is completely ridiculous.
I'm an Opponent of the verse. Pointing things out like those profiles is what I do.
You've been told repeatedly that we're recently working on the profiles and that we've recently finished a CRT.

This is more of you problem. You usually never do this in good faith.

Why don't you focus on outdated Pokemon profiles instead of endlessly complaining on how we Digimon supporters handle outdated Digimon profiles?

For the record, I have no hate towards the Pokemon supporters. Although, my annoyance (not hatred) is solely with Sean.
 
OK?

And we Digimon supporters are currently working on the profiles? We also recently finished a CRT.

How does that remotely suggest the profiles be deleted?
It doesn't, the profiles do.

I unironically agree.

This behavior of his regarding Digimon on this forum (as well as other social media) isn't the first time.

For example:


However it's understandable if staff doesn't make a rule about it. But this repeating behavior of his is completely ridiculous.
Do you seriously believe that I just go around looking for things to delete? I have agreed multiple times to keep my beef with the Digimon verse and its supporters offsite, and I have. Just because you disagree that something should be deleted doesn't mean I'm doing anything more than my share as an Opponent of the verse.

You've been told repeatedly that we're recently working on the profiles and that we've recently finished a CRT.

This is more of you problem. You usually never do this in good faith.

Why don't you focus on outdated Pokemon profiles instead of endlessly complaining on how we Digimon supporters handle outdated Digimon profiles?

For the record, I have no hate towards the Pokemon supporters. Although, my annoyance (not hatred) is solely with Sean.
Yes, and I never see any change, and it appears that they only do this to deflect any criticism against how the verse appears.

I would need a Pokemon CRT for that. I have 5 going. Perpetually. Because nobody gives a shit about Pokemon in VS anymore and I can't move until they do.
 
Back
Top