• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Review on Yogiri and his abilities (Tier 0 Upgrade)

BoastJr

He/Him
Messages
2,758
Reaction score
3,983
Yogiri is Tier 0 because nobody actually knows who he is.

Like, genuinely. Ask someone to explain Yogiri and they’ll say:

"Uh… he kills things by… existing? I think?”

Boom. Already beyond knowledge.

If a character cannot be fully known, described, or explained, then they have surpassed epistemology. And if they’ve surpassed epistemology, they’ve surpassed language. And if they’ve surpassed language, they’re ineffable.

And what do we call beings that are ineffable, beyond description, beyond comprehension?

That’s right: Tier 0.

You can’t scale what you can’t conceptualize.
You can’t conceptualize Yogiri because every explanation collapses into “trust me bro.”
Therefore Yogiri exists in the same ontological category as:
• The Tao
• Nirvana
• That one SCP article nobody finished reading

Also, consider this:
If Yogiri were not Tier 0, someone would have explained him clearly by now.

But they haven’t.

Which means:
• He transcends lore consistency
• He transcends power-scaling terminology
• He transcends the wiki itself

At this point Yogiri isn’t a character, he’s a metaphysical blind spot.

Trying to argue against Yogiri being Tier 0 is like trying to refute divine simplicity with a YouTube comment. The act of debating him only proves his supremacy.

In conclusion:
Yogiri is Tier 0
Because Tier 0 is where you put things
When you give up understanding them

QED. 🗿

Yogiri is kills anything.
Not “anything that exists.”
Not “anything with a power level.”
Anything.
Physical objects? Dead.
Immortal beings? Dead.
Abstract concepts? Also dead.
Narrative tension? Executed on sight.
If it can be thought, Yogiri can kill it.
If it can’t be thought, Yogiri has already killed the idea of thinking about it.
People say:
“But what about beings beyond death?”
Cool. Yogiri doesn’t kill you.
He kills the condition that allows you to not be dead.
That’s not an attack. That’s ontological tax evasion.

At this point Yogiri isn’t interacting with the universe — he’s issuing cease-and-desist orders to reality.
Death gods? He kills death.
Fate manipulators? He kills fate.
Authors? Don’t get cocky.

And here’s the real Tier 0 logic bomb:
If Yogiri can kill anything, then he can kill: Power systems, Scaling frameworks, The very concept of “tiers”, Which means Tier 0 isn’t a rank he occupies — it’s a courtesy label we invented so battleboard forums don’t collapse. Also notice: Yogiri doesn’t scream. He doesn’t charge up. He doesn’t explain. He just decides something should stop being a problem, and reality nods politely. That’s not power.

That’s administrative authority over existence. You can’t outscale Yogiri because scaling implies comparison, and Yogiri has already killed comparison. You can’t say “my character resists death” because Yogiri isn’t using death — he’s using finality as a lifestyle choice.

In summary: Yogiri kills beings, Yogiri kills abstractions, Yogiri kills mechanics, Yogiri kills arguments Therefore Yogiri is Tier 0 not because he’s strong, but because debating him is a self-terminating process. The moment you try to argue otherwise, your premise is already dead.


Literally. 💀

here is scans incase people try to refute the most obvious tier upgrade

this is totally not stolen btw and 100% my scans

Senses


Instant Death Ability

Capabilities:



Automatic Defenses:


True Form


Miscellaneous

In conclusion : Yogiri solos your verse

Agrees :
Disagrees :
Undecided :

IMG-3925.jpg
 
Last edited:
Okay, since someone asked me to "debunk" this… wtf does it even mean, also bold of you if you think it was the OP himself

Yogiri is Tier 0 because nobody actually knows who he is.

Like, genuinely. Ask someone to explain Yogiri and they’ll say:

"Uh… he kills things by… existing? I think?”

Boom. Already beyond knowledge.

That implies no notion of a existing beyond the confines of Epistemology in its entirely.
If a character cannot be fully known, described, or explained, then they have surpassed epistemology. And if they’ve surpassed epistemology, they’ve surpassed language. And if they’ve surpassed language, they’re ineffable.

Having Apophatic Theology or being Ineffable does not necessitate to be Tier-0

And what do we call beings that are ineffable, beyond description, beyond comprehension?

That’s right: Tier 0.

Ig Cthulhu Mythos can be Tier-0 again then if "beyond comprehension" is enough 🥀
You can’t scale what you can’t conceptualize.
You can’t conceptualize Yogiri because every explanation collapses into “trust me bro.”

"Trust me bro" can be debunk with "Nah uh" though.
Therefore Yogiri exists in the same ontological category as:
• The Tao
• Nirvana
• That one SCP article nobody finished reading

The Tao's Ineffability comes from its greatness not because the epistemology of someone who Yogiri meets is lower than basic human.

It depends where you scale his Nirvana

SCP articles have NEP because no one was able to finish them thus they are non-existent, which NEP does not qualify for Tier-0

Also no mention of good ol' Neoplatonism so gg
Also, consider this:
If Yogiri were not Tier 0, someone would have explained him clearly by now.

Yogiri has passive illiteracy hax which makes people lose the ability to debate, SweetDao already surpassed this hax and gained immunity so it doesn't hold.
But they haven’t.

Which means:
• He transcends lore consistency

But not bad written allegation, again, another anti feat
• He transcends power-scaling terminology
Did not transcend the Named Dao aka SweetDao, so already below Nameless Dao, that's category error.
• He transcends the wiki itself
Nah, lies, he got soloed by someone from this wiki itself
At this point Yogiri isn’t a character, he’s a metaphysical blind spot.

ChatGPT level written
Trying to argue against Yogiri being Tier 0 is like trying to refute divine simplicity with a YouTube comment.

If the YouTube comment is made by me… then yea it seems it isn't impossible
The act of debating him only proves his supremacy.

Yeah sure… already debunked.
In conclusion:
Yogiri is Tier 0
Because Tier 0 is where you put things
When you give up understanding them

QED. 🗿

Yogiri is kills anything.
Not “anything that exists.”
Not “anything with a power level.”
Anything.
Physical objects? Dead.
Immortal beings? Dead.
Abstract concepts? Also dead.
Narrative tension? Executed on sight.
If it can be thought, Yogiri can kill it.
If it can’t be thought, Yogiri has already killed the idea of thinking about it.
People say:
“But what about beings beyond death?”
Cool. Yogiri doesn’t kill you.
He kills the condition that allows you to not be dead.
That’s not an attack. That’s ontological tax evasion.

ChatGPT diffed

At this point Yogiri isn’t interacting with the universe — he’s issuing cease-and-desist orders to reality.
Which ain't Tier-0
Death gods? He kills death.
Fate manipulators? He kills fate.
Authors? Don’t get cocky.
He still got solo by Named Dao so… Named Dao > Yogiri > Author > Gods > Fate?
And here’s the real Tier 0 logic bomb:
If Yogiri can kill anything, then he can kill: Power systems, Scaling frameworks, The very concept of “tiers”, Which means Tier 0 isn’t a rank he occupies — it’s a courtesy label we invented so battleboard forums don’t collapse.

All this to get soloed by average human
Also notice: Yogiri doesn’t scream. He doesn’t charge up. He doesn’t explain. He just decides something should stop being a problem, and reality nods politely. That’s not power.

Yea it ain't power it is just boring writing, agree with you
That’s administrative authority over existence. You can’t outscale Yogiri because

He's so bum you probably just don't want to
scaling implies comparison, and Yogiri has already killed comparison.

Max I can give this feat is 11C
You can’t say “my character resists death” because Yogiri isn’t using death — he’s using finality as a lifestyle choice.

It implies he has any form of life to have "style" for so… take it as you will.
In summary: Yogiri kills beings, Yogiri kills abstractions, Yogiri kills mechanics, Yogiri kills arguments Therefore Yogiri is Tier 0 not because he’s strong, but because debating him is a self-terminating process. The moment you try to argue otherwise, your premise is already dead.

In summary: Nah uh. Also Named Dao victim.
Literally. 💀

here is scans incase people try to refute the most obvious tier upgrade

this is totally not stolen btw and 100% my scans

Senses


Instant Death Ability

Capabilities:



Automatic Defenses:


True Form


Miscellaneous

In conclusion : Yogiri solos your verse

IMG-3925.jpg

Ain't reading allat so gg

Hate you for forcing me to write this unfunny brainrot
 
Okay, since someone asked me to "debunk" this… wtf does it even mean, also bold of you if you think it was the OP himself



That implies no notion of a existing beyond the confines of Epistemology in its entirely.


Having Apophatic Theology or being Ineffable does not necessitate to be Tier-0



Ig Cthulhu Mythos can be Tier-0 again then if "beyond comprehension" is enough 🥀


"Trust me bro" can be debunk with "Nah uh" though.


The Tao's Ineffability comes from its greatness not because the epistemology of someone who Yogiri meets is lower than basic human.

It depends where you scale his Nirvana

SCP articles have NEP because no one was able to finish them thus they are non-existent, which NEP does not qualify for Tier-0

Also no mention of good ol' Neoplatonism so gg


Yogiri has passive illiteracy hax which makes people lose the ability to debate, SweetDao already surpassed this hax and gained immunity so it doesn't hold.


But not bad written allegation, again, another anti feat

Did not transcend the Named Dao aka SweetDao, so already below Nameless Dao, that's category error.

Nah, lies, he got soloed by someone from this wiki itself


ChatGPT level written


If the YouTube comment is made by me… then yea it seems it isn't impossible


Yeah sure… already debunked.


ChatGPT diffed


Which ain't Tier-0

He still got solo by Named Dao so… Named Dao > Yogiri > Author > Gods > Fate?


All this to get soloed by average human


Yea it ain't power it is just boring writing, agree with you


He's so bum you probably just don't want to


Max I can give this feat is 11C


It implies he has any form of life to have "style" for so… take it as you will.


In summary: Nah uh. Also Named Dao victim.


Ain't reading allat so gg
all of them wrong so irrelevant
 
What if someone's fav verses and character are Isekai at Peace and Shallow Vernal🤨
Ah, good question.

While I do posit that Yogiri’s existence would necessitate Tier 0, he himself is not truly killing anyone. According to divine simplicity, ultimate reality is one, indivisible, and without parts; the All-in-One cannot be reduced or broken down into separable components.

Reality, then, is illusory in the sense of apparent differentiation. We are already part of Yogiri — a philosophical ensemble in which all distinctions are internal rather than external. Yogiri merely generates the appearance that something is being “killed,” but this could not be further from the truth.





Nothing is destroyed, because nothing was ever ontologically separate to begin with. Every verse, every structure, and every entity was already contained within him from the start.
 
Ah, good question.

While I do posit that Yogiri’s existence would necessitate Tier 0, he himself is not truly killing anyone. According to divine simplicity, ultimate reality is one, indivisible, and without parts; the All-in-One cannot be reduced or broken down into separable components.

Reality, then, is illusory in the sense of apparent differentiation. We are already part of Yogiri — a philosophical ensemble in which all distinctions are internal rather than external. Yogiri merely generates the appearance that something is being “killed,” but this could not be further from the truth.





Nothing is destroyed, because nothing was ever ontologically separate to begin with. Every verse, every structure, and every entity was already contained within him from the start.
Can he beat Goku tho
 
Okay, since someone asked me to "debunk" this… wtf does it even mean, also bold of you if you think it was the OP himself

Saying Yogiri is “beyond knowledge” is not a statement about human ignorance, but about epistemic closure. In philosophy, something can be fully defined negatively (via limits of knowing) without being reducible to ignorance. This is standard apophatic reasoning, not a concession of weakness.

In other words: Yogiri isn’t unknowable because people are dumb — he’s unknowable because the framework of knowing collapses when applied to him.

It’s about systemic failure of total explanation. In philosophy of science, if every attempt at formalization breaks, we infer a category-transcendent object, not bad writing.


That implies no notion of a existing beyond the confines of Epistemology in its entirely.
Having Apophatic Theology or being Ineffable does not necessitate to be Tier-0

You’re correct that ineffability alone doesn’t equal Tier 0.

But that was never the argument.
Tier 0, philosophically, corresponds to that which is ontologically prior to all differentiations, not merely mysterious. Yogiri’s ineffability is paired with causal finality — he doesn’t just evade description, he terminates the conditions that allow descriptions to function.


Ig Cthulhu Mythos can be Tier-0 again then if "beyond comprehension" is enough 🥀
Apophatic theology + causal primacy ≠ random cosmic fog.

Lovecraftian entities are epistemically opaque but ontologically contingent. They exist within a narrative cosmos, are subject to fear, madness, and cosmic structure. Yogiri, by contrast, ends structures rather than inhabits them
"Trust me bro" can be debunk with "Nah uh" though.
Non sequitr
The Tao's Ineffability comes from its greatness not because the epistemology of someone who Yogiri meets is lower than basic human.
The Author would know what the Tao is because anyone with access to the internet can find out about it therefore its qualities would be retained in whatever work they presented

The Named Dao may govern the beginning while Yogiri governs the end and the beginning. If the ultimate God who is said to be omniscient and therefore logically knows all mortal things such as the Eternal Nameless Tao could not understand Yogiri then Yogiri is logically in the same category as the Eternal Nameless Tao
It depends where you scale his Nirvana

SCP articles have NEP because no one was able to finish them thus they are non-existent, which NEP does not qualify for Tier-0

Also no mention of good ol' Neoplatonism so gg

In Neoplatonism, the One does not “fight” — it emanates, and lower layers dissolve when reabsorbed. Yogiri functions as an inverse emanation: instead of overflowing being, he collapses it.

The Named Dao argument fails here because the Dao sustains.
Yogiri has passive illiteracy hax which makes people lose the ability to debate, SweetDao already surpassed this hax and gained immunity so it doesn't hold.
I disagree

Did not transcend the Named Dao aka SweetDao, so already below Nameless Dao, that's category error.


The “Named Dao > Yogiri” chain assumes linear metaphysics.


Advanced metaphysics isn’t linear. A sustaining principle (Dao) and a terminating principle (Yogiri) are orthogonal, not hierarchical.

He still got solo by Named Dao so… Named Dao > Yogiri > Author > Gods > Fate?
The Ultimate God would know all ontological concepts and still concluded that Yogiri is beyond any which falls under the definition of tier 0

This is a circular argument
All this to get soloed by average human
As Yogiri is all things in one, we shoud logically scale humans to tier 0 as they are merely a facet of Yogiri without invoking multiplicity
Yea it ain't power it is just boring writing, agree with you


He's so bum you probably just don't want to


Max I can give this feat is 11C


It implies he has any form of life to have "style" for so… take it as you will.


In summary: Nah uh. Also Named Dao victim.

He’s Tier 0 because:

He terminates ontology, He collapses epistemology, He renders scaling incoherent as Scaling a character who is not made to be powerscaled falls under paraconsist logic
Ain't reading allat so gg
Concession
Hate you for forcing me to write this unfunny brainrot
Thank you bro ❤️
 
Saying Yogiri is “beyond knowledge” is not a statement about human ignorance, but about epistemic closure. In philosophy, something can be fully defined negatively (via limits of knowing) without being reducible to ignorance. This is standard apophatic reasoning, not a concession of weakness.

In other words: Yogiri isn’t unknowable because people are dumb — he’s unknowable because the framework of knowing collapses when applied to him.

It’s about systemic failure of total explanation. In philosophy of science, if every attempt at formalization breaks, we infer a category-transcendent object, not bad writing.


That implies no notion of a existing beyond the confines of Epistemology in its entirely.

Your argument does more heavy lifting then scans implies, the scan is merely speaking about the person being too illiterate to truly bypass Yogurt's hax.

The value of notion itself vary verse by verse, and even if we would say it indeed qualifies for anything "beyond epistemology" it would merely mean a form of Ineffability that does not grant any Tier-0.
You’re correct that ineffability alone doesn’t equal Tier 0.

Then you shouldn't have even mentioned this wrong equivalent of Ineffability 🥀
But that was never the argument.
Tier 0, philosophically, corresponds to that which is ontologically prior to all differentiations, not merely mysterious. Yogiri’s ineffability is paired with causal finality — he doesn’t just evade description, he terminates the conditions that allow descriptions to function.

Again, the philosophy is true, however the argument does not hold, Yogiri is a being that has been regularly transcended by fine written and basic media literacy.

Apophatic theology + causal primacy ≠ random cosmic fog.

Lovecraftian entities are epistemically opaque but ontologically contingent. They exist within a narrative cosmos, are subject to fear, madness, and cosmic structure. Yogiri, by contrast, ends structures rather than inhabits them

You do not gain a tier by being above to the prior structures, so it still do not hold.
Non sequitr

Whatever bro
The Author would know what the Tao is because anyone with access to the internet can find out about it therefore its qualities would be retained in whatever work they presented

The Named Dao may govern the beginning while Yogiri governs the end and the beginning. If the ultimate God who is said to be omniscient and therefore logically knows all mortal things such as the Eternal Nameless Tao could not understand Yogiri then Yogiri is logically in the same category as the Eternal Nameless Tao

It is wrong, we DO NEED in verse demonstration, Daoism that qualifies for Tier-0 is a very narrow, very specific concept that needs to have all its statements aligned to a Tier-0 (or else GGZ Yog-Sothoth is also Tier-0 all over again).

There are more to Daoism than the a general idea (that you already took flawly). It's like saying a JRPG series has some "God", and also has a "holy book" in which it has Bible quote so T0 God.

There's a lot more to it like the Zhuangzi, Liezi, Huainanzi, Wenzi, Taipingjing, Lingbao Scriptures, and the Daozang in general, which comprises 1,500 texts.

You need the Tao being explicitly defined as what it is as a Tier-0.
In Neoplatonism, the One does not “fight” — it emanates, and lower layers dissolve when reabsorbed. Yogiri functions as an inverse emanation: instead of overflowing being, he collapses it.

No Tier-0 fights, in Neoplatonism The One indeed does "emanates." The first principle of reality is "the One", an utterly simple, ineffable, beyond being and non-being, unknowable subsistence which is both the creative source of the universe and the teleological end of all existing things.

It is true that from the One emanations of different levels of lesser realities known as "hypostases" comes, such as The One emanates the Nous, the first principle after the One and contains all knowledge in a unified form. It is both the knower, the known, and the act of knowing, embodying a complete unity. However, it makes the next problem…

Divine Simplicity, similar to Apophatic Theology, does NOT hold.

Your argument for Divine Simplicity is mere unity it a self realized wholeness that is completely wrong.

The nature of Intellect and Being is the true and primary cosmos, one that is not separated from itself and is not weak because of division nor deficient, even with respect to its parts, inasmuch as each part is not torn off from the whole. But the entire life of this true cosmos and Intellect entire, since it lives and thinks together in unity, ensures that the part is the whole and everything is in friendship with itself without one thing being cut off from another or becoming different in isolation and estranged from the rest. Hence, one does not commit injustice against another even if they are opposites.

Oneness ≠ divine simplicity, Oneness just means to be “one”, which is something all things possess through self-identity and it isn’t at all exclusive to Tier 0. It does not necessitate a form of "Simple" existence prior to all divisions.

A good example of what it would look like to experience something that is really without parts is:

Yet, my feet did not stop. Not even the will to stop arose. The flow itself was me, and I was the flow. Why should I fear returning to the place I was born?

I was dreaming. I was aware of that. The surroundings were like darkness, yet in truth, it was not darkness at all. It was not light either—perhaps it was the absence of color itself, or so I thought. I was severed from everything. Only the flow remained.

The subject experiencing the ultimate reality does not experience anything nor multiplicity whatsoever, it is an state beyond experience in its own way, they are removed wholly phenomenologically from the experience of multiplicity entirely or in other words, there is the lack of phenomenology, and only experience an undivided "flow" that can not be "experience" in multiplicity and subject-object relationship, as everything is just the simple, accidentless flaw.


The Named Dao argument fails here because the Dao sustains.

It does not, the Named Dao already has overpowered Yogiri, and even if it would not, the argument for Nameless Tao equivalence is ridiculously weak.
I disagree

Your disagreement is irrelevant.
The “Named Dao > Yogiri” chain assumes linear metaphysics.

Which he's bound to
Advanced metaphysics isn’t linear. A sustaining principle (Dao) and a terminating principle (Yogiri) are orthogonal, not hierarchical.

It is hierarchical principle because it is following a hierarchical principle of DIFFERENT ontological states whatsoever by the very notion of power difference nevertheless of statements existing.
The Ultimate God would know all ontological concepts and still concluded that Yogiri is beyond any which falls under the definition of tier 0

It does not you are side stepping the anti-feats, the most blatant anti-feats, of being defeated and bringing another argument that even without the anti-feats would not hold for Tier-0.
This is a circular argument

As Yogiri is all things in one, we shoud logically scale humans to tier 0 as they are merely a facet of Yogiri without invoking multiplicity

Your argument falls into a lack of true depth and understand about Tier-0. You can't escape the argument with "it is facet of Tier-0 so it is not anti-feat", it implies forms of changes and accident, and a form of "distinction" nevertheless how you want to sugarcoat it. The moment one "returns" to the "Absolute" (Tier-0) they lose all the distinctions of any form and their individuality, such that even if there be any mention of "distinctions" it should be purely illusionary and without causing any form of cause and effect or part-whole relationship with the wholeness itself, which it does not follow.
He’s Tier 0 because:

He terminates ontology, He collapses epistemology, He renders scaling incoherent as Scaling a character who is not made to be powerscaled falls under paraconsist logic.

All points above has said how this logic simply does not work
Concession

Bro that is a long list of hax that does not scale anywhere, I hope you understand.
Thank you bro ❤️

Just for you bro ❤️
 
Last edited:
Your argument does more heavy lifting then scans implies, the scan is merely speaking about the person being too illiterate to truly bypass Yogurt's hax.

The value of notion itself vary verse by verse, and even if we would say it indeed qualifies for anything "beyond epistemology" it would merely mean a form of Ineffability that does not grant any Tier-0.


Then you shouldn't have even mentioned this wrong equivalent of Ineffability 🥀


Again, the philosophy is true, however the arch does not hold, Yogiri is a being that has been regularly transcended by fine written and basic media literacy.



You do not gain a tier by being above to the prior structures, so it still do not hold.


Whatever bro


It is wrong, we DO NEED in verse demonstration, Daoism that qualifies for Tier-0 is a very narrow, very specific concept that needs to have all its statements aligned to a Tier-0 (or else GGZ Yog-Sothoth is also Tier-0 all over again).

There are more to Daoism than the a general idea (that you already took flawly). It's like saying a JRPG series has some "God", and also has a "holy book" in which it has Bible quote so T0 God.

There's a lot more to it like the Zhuangzi, Liezi, Huainanzi, Wenzi, Taipingjing, Lingbao Scriptures, and the Daozang in general, which comprises 1,500 texts.

You need the Tao being explicitly defined as what it is as a Tier-0.


No Tier-0 fights, in Neoplatonism The One indeed does "emanates." The first principle of reality is "the One", an utterly simple, ineffable, beyond being and non-being, unknowable subsistence which is both the creative source of the universe and the teleological end of all existing things.

It is true that from the One emanations of different levels of lesser realities known as "hypostases" comes, such as The One emanates the Nous, the first principle after the One and contains all knowledge in a unified form. It is both the knower, the known, and the act of knowing, embodying a complete unity. However, it makes the next problem…

Divine Simplicity, similar to Apophatic Theology, does NOT hold.

Your argument for Divine Simplicity is mere unity it a self realized wholeness that is completely wrong.



Oneness ≠ divine simplicity, Oneness just means to be “one”, which is something all things possess through self-identity and it isn’t at all exclusive to Tier 0. It does not necessitate a form of "Simple" existence prior to all divisions.

A good example of what it would look like to experience something that is really without parts is:



The subject experiencing the ultimate reality does not experience anything nor multiplicity whatsoever, it is an state beyond experience in its own way, they are removed wholly phenomenologically from the experience of multiplicity entirely or in other words, there is the lack of phenomenology, and only experience an undivided "flow" that can not be "experience" in multiplicity and subject-object relationship, ass everything is just the simple, accidentless flaw.




It does not, the Named Dao already has overpowered Yogiri, and even if it would not, the argument for Nameless Tao equivalence is ridiculously weak.


Your disagreement is irrelevant.


Which he's bound to


It is hierarchical principle because it is following a hierarchical principle of DIFFERENT ontological states whatsoever by the very notion of power difference nevertheless of statements existing.


It does not you are side stepping the anti-feats, the most blatant anti-feats, of being defeated and bringing another argument that even without the anti-feats would not hold for Tier-0.


Your argument falls into a lack of true depth and understand about Tier-0. You can escape the argument that "it is facet of Tier-0 so it is not anti-feat", it implies forms of changes and accident, and a form of "distinction" nevertheless how you want to sugarcoat it. The moment one "returns" to the "Absolute" (Tier-0) they lose all the distinctions of any form and their individuality, such that even if there be any mention of "distinctions" it should be purely illusionary and without causing any form of cause and effect or part-whole relationship with the wholeness itself, which it does not follow.


All points above has said how this logic simply does not work


Bro that is a long list of hax that does not scale anywhere, I hope you understand.


Just for you bro ❤️
you are just embrassing yourself with lack of the knowledge about ID ngl
 
then, instead of Yogiri being tier 0 boundless. is there a boundless hax tier? since it seems to make no sense when a being at tier10 to tier4 is able to wipe tier 0 beings out if their powers do work on each other xD
 
I don't think the said character can interact with nep type 2 beings let alone nep type 1

Anos isn't even the real one to kill him yogiri needs to find the source that is non existence

End needs something to perceive

Everything needs a logic to function

Some true form needs to be above phanoma and yogiri is stated within that shit

The Novel jp and eng language doesn't even match properly
 
Back
Top