• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Star Wars Discussion Thread Canon/Legends- Episode VI Return of the Threadi

6bc56726a956.jpg
 
If a ship has 75 MGLT and something could reach simular speeds in space with the ship would that mean it would also have 75 MGLT in speed aswell?
 
Only if we have some statement that the first spacecraft is at maximum speed.
In Han Solo movie we see that the Summa Verminoth could keep up in speed with the Millenium Falcon to some degree which with its mass if i calculated right would end up in the multi-continental areas with it being consistant as it survived near clusters (not inside tho).
 
When is star wars legends going to get updated?
To be direct, as far as I know nobody is planning anything.

I mean, there were one or two users saying they wanted to do something, but no news.

Me and @DaReaperMan were planning to update the P&A of some Sith Lords since they basically have identical P&A with only a few changes (but that won't be something anytime soon because we're focusing on other things). If you want to contribute you can talk to him too.
 
if we can get this High 6-A through then illl prob simp for the calc because it lets me make a legends vs canon matchup i wanna do
 
theres a few, vader and thrawn are on a whole better in canon, Thrawn from zahn in both his novel trilogies is much less of caricature than his legends counterpart , that being said whenever Filoni handles thrawn its shit so maybe you can argue it cancels out lol, vader is far more consistent in canon and isnt a ***** made every time the author gets a chance like in legends.

I generally prefer how clones are handled in canon too, legends often feels like it was trying to ape the spartan program from halo, which isnt helped by Karen travis constantly being the biggest mandalorian bootlicker that she ruins other characters to prop them up.

theres other stuff i can talk about that canon does better or legends does better, either way i actually dont have much of a favorite because i like different things or dislike different stuff from both. so for me these kinds of questions are hard because they treat both as monolith
 
vader is far more consistent in canon and isnt a ***** made every time the author gets a chance like in legends.
damn, there was another post about which character is better written in canon than legends

and everyone seems to have the same opinion on Vader.

Besides the Non-canon Comic where a Stormtrooper greets Vader a happy birthday, I don't know much about Legends Vader, so uh wdym by making Vader a *****?
 
damn, there was another post about which character is better written in canon than legends

and everyone seems to have the same opinion on Vader.

Besides the Non-canon Comic where a Stormtrooper greets Vader a happy birthday, I don't know much about Legends Vader, so uh wdym by making Vader a *****?
many authors took lucas idea of Vader being a broken man to the extreme often undermining him at every opportunity, both emotionally and physically, to clarify im not saying villains cant be explored emotionally and physically at their worst but when its a consistent pattern across almost all your appearances its an issue, and its often against random no name jobbers, like from a powerscaling POV, pre prequels vader and post prequels Vader is treated way differently in the continuity, Vader was considered a massive deal even by dark empire,which clarifies Luke didnt surpass him yet, by the time of the prequels and there after we have like 10+ statements from TPM alone that places Vader below padawan Obi wan and on screen feats of him jobbing constantly, without ignoring a critical amount of anti feats, you'll struggle to get vader in top 30 strongest sith, let alone force users.
 
many authors took lucas idea of Vader being a broken man to the extreme often undermining him at every opportunity, both emotionally and physically, to clarify im not saying villains cant be explored emotionally and physically at their worst but when its a consistent pattern across almost all your appearances its an issue, and its often against random no name jobbers, like from a powerscaling POV, pre prequels vader and post prequels Vader is treated way differently in the continuity, Vader was considered a massive deal even by dark empire,which clarifies Luke didnt surpass him yet, by the time of the prequels and there after we have like 10+ statements from TPM alone that places Vader below padawan Obi wan and on screen feats of him jobbing constantly, without ignoring a critical amount of anti feats, you'll struggle to get vader in top 30 strongest sith, let alone force users.
damn.
 
yo Hagane, the High Republic Jedi calc isn't High 6-A+ it's just High 6-A, the value isn't enough to reach the "+"

you should correct it (just remove the +, considering that's the only thing wrong with it.)
 
yo Hagane, the High Republic Jedi calc isn't High 6-A+ it's just High 6-A, the value isn't enough to reach the "+"

you should correct it (just remove the +, considering that's the only thing wrong with it.)
I don't agree with the method we currently use to define where a value can be considered "+", VS Battles definites the differences of AP values based on ratios of the high end and low end over the difference between them, so it does not make sense to do a linear approach to finding the "+" as with using (low end + high end)/2, it's better to do low end*sqrt(high end/low end) to get it.

This is especially because when the ratio between high and low end values for 4-B, for example, is over 686.97 billion, dividing by two to find the "+" value does not help out at all!
 
I don't agree with the method we currently use to define where a value can be considered "+", VS Battles definites the differences of AP values based on ratios of the high end and low end over the difference between them, so it does not make sense to do a linear approach to finding the "+" as with using (low end + high end)/2, it's better to do low end*sqrt(high end/low end) to get it.

This is especially because when the ratio between high and low end values for 4-B, for example, is over 686.97 billion, dividing by two to find the "+" value does not help out at all!
unfortunately, that's how the wiki does it, so uh unless your planning on changing how people add the "+" I suggest you remove the "+" on the calc.
 
what y'all consider, the worst Star Wars Legends related media
Incredibly, it's too free.

In the sense of the authors creating the stories.

This can (and has) created many contradictions. For example, Legends is divided into several levels of canonicity.

If it's already complicated to see the consistency in the powerscaling of the canon, for instance, which tries to be more consistent, imagine in Legends? That's why I avoid going into too much detail.
 
Incredibly, it's too free.

In the sense of the authors creating the stories.

This can (and has) created many contradictions. For example, Legends is divided into several levels of canonicity.

If it's already complicated to see the consistency in the powerscaling of the canon, for instance, which tries to be more consistent, imagine in Legends? That's why I avoid going into too much detail.
I'm mostly talking about in writing
 
Back
Top