- 1,455
- 952
The infamous sad furry dog...Deadass my imgur aint working for week so cant view scan![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The infamous sad furry dog...Deadass my imgur aint working for week so cant view scan![]()
Type 1: Exists purely as an abstraction. These characters lack a true physical form, and affecting them requires the ability to affect directly the abstraction itself, because eventual physical manifestations are merely avatars.
Type 2: Embodies an abstraction, and can be resurrected or regenerate indefinitely thanks to it. Destroying the abstraction is required to permanently kill those characters, but they can still be affected without directly altering it.
You're making a lot of sense. Though I do feel like I'll need to try and dive deeper into the points I raised and remove any confusion if possible.Tbh, you have a point with some of this. She was a manifestation as a human, but shed the form as a God. So she's not manifested as a human anymore in the endpoint. Thing is she is still using that power and has a human shape
She is the impossible though, and using her power of mana extends this. While she was AE2 as an avatar, it may be somewhat different in her Goddess key. As long as her power is there she can overlay settings and do anything she wants, including come back even if she is erased completely.
Unless we are saying, for type 1 that is, the human manifestation was like an avatar created by the power, and as she ascended she completely assimilated with that power or something. And as an avatar she represented it, in her true form she actually became it. OR the power was always there, which is herself, before and after creation, alovenus manifested later because of it. Thing is that would still be AE2 I think
I feel like type 2 can still work however, as even in the endpoint she directly uses the power in ways that make herself unkillable, and the others draw from that power.
I'll go back to this for a bit and summarize my whole point and argument so I don't repeat myself like anAs we know Gods are kind of like blanks that lack aspects, so they Alovenus's power impose stuff on themselves.
Interesting. What I gathered is there is no "'external power", just Alovenus herself who exists as a blank template (and makes other Gods who use her power do the same), until she decides to overlay her existence with the true part of her power, settings, which imposes attributes on everything. If these settings are wiped, and even if she is rendered non-existent, it's still like going back to her initial state.You're making a lot of sense. Though I do feel like I'll need to try and dive deeper into the points I raised and remove any confusion if possible.
I think it is fine that avatars can exist but here's the thing, avatars wouldn't be able to determine said AE type (at least from what I understood).
Both AE2 and AE1 characters can have avatars and losing your human form/body does not change your AE by itself. Essentially the "human" Alovenus being "AE2-like" as an avatar doesn’t actually matter all that much, unless the abstraction she embodied was external to her (and if so, at that point in time it would have made her human avatar be AE2), and her true existence remained distinct from it (already existed in the Final Point or elsewhere).
When you bring up the points of "as long as her power is there she can come back" or "she directly uses the power in the endpoint" or "others draw from that power"
This way of framing it would mean that it implicitly treats her power as an external abstraction or governing principle that isn't her. And I believe this is what causes the confusion and is exactly why it sounds like AE2.
As you said in Awlba Gods are blanks, they lack inherent aspects. All aspects (stats/forms/rules and even identity traits) are imposed via the setting.
So if Alovenus imposes power on herself, uses Settings to define her own existence and has no pre-existing metaphysical structure she draws from (Final Point is nothingness and a white canvas), then "her power" is not an external thing she can tap into and draw power from (unless we are arguing the setting is a separate higher entity that predates Alovenus and is the thing that made Awlba and Alovenus possible in the first place.)
I think I'm sounding like a broken record but I really want to drive this point home. The logic of AE2 is that of
Character ‹ depends on › abstraction.
But with Alovenus, if she's erased and disappears nothing external restores her, what she does instead is reassert herself through the setting and overwrite the current imposed rule/law (that law/rule/limit being from her own setting that others are using against her), thus there can't be any higher power or abstraction that sustains her. AE2 characters can return because the concept still exists. But Alovenus returns because she decides that she exists (while her concept and everything else about her is gone.) This also ties back to the whole "nothing can exist in the Final Point schtick" as her getting erased (in the Final Point) would mean she is just returning to her primal state in which she has no attributes as everything else in the Final Point. In layman's terms she ascended to godhood, she then first interacted with the Final Point and was rendered non-existent but she then grew bored of not existing and rewrote her existence (via the setting) into having a body there.
And those two concepts in my eyes, are not the same thing.
I'll go back to this for a bit and summarize my whole point and argument so I don't repeat myself like anidiot. In short yea that description of the gods is correct and is the reason why I believe this would directly contradict AE2 for them because that would again require a defined abstraction that precedes or transcends the gods. But as you said the gods are blanks and have no attributes prior to them imposing any and all laws. So if Alovenus starts as a blank, then defines herself entirely through the setting, and has no metaphysical power source other than herself. Then the only thing that exists fundamentally is her self-definition and it all ultimately collapses back into Alovenus always existing as herself and being her own power as a an all-encompassing singularity (which she is stated to be as well).
Edit: if you're curious here is a general definition of an all-encompassing singularity. "In essence, the all-encompassing singularity in metaphysics is a foundational principle of unity, a unified state of awareness, or an ultimate reality from which everything originates and to which everything is connected."
Honestly not sure what's allowed on this wiki when it comes to stuff like this, she doesn't cleanly fall under any of the types such as concept and/or thought. Though an abstraction is a form of existence that is not bound to physical reality and does not require a concrete form to exist, and it doesn't have to be a concept per se.Only thing us, what would the abstract be? Since no concepts exist. Or perhaps "'alovenus" is the only one. Not sure on this part
If we were to point out the aspects, we'd need to explain she is "'the impossible" which is the same as "concept of herself", and all notions that shouldn't exist. So her AE is technically "herself", however I don't think I've seen the term "self defining" used on a profile on this site tbh. Similar to what I suggested for immunity, maybe it could be called "lack of metaphysical aspects" or something, or something like "asepctless existence". Or we just wouldn't point out a specific type, and just explain how her AE works instead in description.Honestly not sure what's allowed on this wiki when it comes to stuff like this, she doesn't cleanly fall under any of the types such as concept and/or thought. Though an abstraction is a form of existence that is not bound to physical reality and does not require a concrete form to exist, and it doesn't have to be a concept per se.
So maybe it could look something like this "Abstract Existence (Type 1 [Memories, Ideas, Concept [Type 3], Empathic, Philosophies & Spirit];"
But instead for Alovenus
"Abstract Existence (Type 1 [Primordial Void, Source Of Existence, Pre-creation, Nothingness]; Alovenus is a purely abstract and a self-subsisting being whose true nature originates from a primordial void like state predating all laws, concepts, identities and structures. Any and all physical or defined form she exhibits is merely a self-imposed manifestation via Settings and does not constitute her true existence or nature."
Honestly if you have any other ideas for what to use, I'm all ears. The problem is that if I say she is "nothingness" or liken her to a concept such as love, beauty, among other, it would be kinda misleading because she is technically none of those. She is an abstract existence that just can't be likined to anything else. I've seen many profiles where they do have AE type 1 without any further explanation (unless that's wrong then I think that's the strategy.) But we could try and use God physiology as a base though.
There's actually more statements than I thought... Orms attacks, Heaven ouroboros, sanieve also did it.Yea, there also statements about planets and stars being destroyed in Ruphas vs Orm.
Just a matter of actually doing a CRT for an upgrade.
Sounds greatIf we were to point out the aspects, we'd need to explain she is "'the impossible" which is the same as "concept of herself", and all notions that shouldn't exist. So her AE is technically "herself", however I don't think I've seen the term "self defining" used on a profile on this site tbh. Similar to what I suggested for immunity, maybe it could be called "lack of metaphysical aspects" or something, or something like "asepctless existence". Or we just wouldn't point out a specific type, and just explain how her AE works instead in description.
Assuming Type 1 gets the go ahead. We'll see the opinions when I actually post it. The AE would tie into the immunity though so it does connect with God physiology