Okkk, I’m back:
As i have said, having no dimensional information and even transcends dimensions stil only land you at BDE Type 1
I know.
Imaginary Singularity have no dimensional information doesn't make Imaginary Space have no dimension information either
This is not a problem. The main distinction happens in respect to Real dimensions, since it’s already known that Imaginary Space is an exotic Space-Time. That’s something that is warranted for
spaces too big to be qualified as standard Space-Time so it’s already in the definitions
Additionally, we qualify dimensions here as quantitative objects; so if quantity is delimited here (as Imaginary is a chaotic space), then there can’t be an ontic dimensional difference between Imaginary’s constituents
We did you get that cannot be ordered in size automatically mean quantitive distinction is delimited?. BDE1 also cannot be ordered in size but isn't mean quantitive distinction is delimited.
BDE1 by itself has no size at all (they have a quantity, as in, having 0 quantity. So it’s completely comparable; 0 < 1). Imaginary things have
something but they cannot be compared to one-another so that’s why quantitative distinction is delimited
Also cannot be ordered in size is nature of imaginary number, i think Qaw already said something about this
The imaginary axis exists, and I’m pretty sure you can order them there. But there are some math nerds here that may be able to confirm this point otherwise it’s mute if you just claim it like this.
Also, since when are Real things projections of Imaginary things irl? I already said it takes inspiration from Imaginary numbers (that’s extremely obvious) but it’s not 1:1
Real Space flows from Imaginary Singularity hardly mean anything, like a physical dimensions flows from void of nothingness is a normal thing in fiction, your logic will make them all Low 1-A. And being BDE1 already made it not qualified as spatial object to begin with. Don't exist in real coordinate space is another supporting point for BDE1, in fact it will be very strange for it to exist in real space
Voids in fiction famously have a size (infinite darkness in comparison to Space-Time). I.e they have a definite quantity, which is much different than actual privation (unless you speak of it in a Neoplatonic sense, but no fiction I know qualifies Voids like that).
Like the fact that universes have a comparable size is already a disqualifier here don’t you think? They even posit part-whole relationships in themselves as they correspond to differing constituents of various Space-Times they envelop. (Umm, basically there’s parts of the Void that are “above” and others that are “below”)
And many of them aren’t even the source of space lol. + Voids are already accepted as 1-A depending on
how they’re qualified:
- A void of nothingness is not necessarily 1-A; it is only 1-A if it encompasses or is vaster than reality in a qualitative manner. For example, imagine a void so distinct from reality that it lacks space-time, not because it’s simply empty, but because it is beyond dimensionality and space-time itself. In comparison, the reality we know would be even lesser than a drop of water in an ocean. In a context like this, the void possesses qualitative superiority, which is why it's referred to as a void of nothingness. no composition from our reality holds significance or meaning within it.
And the Singularity isn’t qualified like your DBZ-esque Void here. It doesn’t have genuine quantity but it still encompasses the dimensions in a universal-like sense. Which is
very different.
And that it can't interfere with real thing and need to be projected just killing the entire argument about Imaginary is quantitatively superior to real space, because if it was, real space be a mere extension and reduction of imaginary space and it can freely affect real thing.
“If a higher Reality can’t affect a lower one, then it means it isn’t 1-A, even though it literally doesn’t exist in comparison to it.”
Ya know, being “too big” to be qualified a certain thing means you can’t conventionally interact with that thing ye? Ya know universals don’t genuinely intersect with Space-Time, ye?
There is no anti-feat here.
Other Aeons who equals to HooH is another problem, as HooH and union of all opposites should and is zero-sum should be greater than individual parts of it
No issues here because we’re positing HooH as nondual to what participates in it (which is only Real Space and not Imaginary Space). Seems wack I know but there isn’t any mutual exclusivity with the Low 1-A rating here.
Also i remembered HooH scan specifically excludes space and time
This is only Arbitrators iirc, it’s why statements like this exist:
But universal laws have no control over time and space, and mortals can only pursue the beauty of Equilibrium[…]
But the rules of mortals are always riddled with flaws. Out of desperation, the Arbitrators were constantly forced over the inexorable passage of time to patch up past fallacies and mistakes, forever shifting the hopes of Equilibrium onto the next "patch." HooH watches on in silence, knowing that the restoration of order could never be shaken in the slightest by such vulgar mortal drama.
Also would be very contradictory if Imaginary in general doesn’t precede Space-Time. (As in, it would literally go against every interpretation of the cosmology)
And more, HooH is stated to have dissolved into a web of logic, yet in IX scans stated logic is just a part that made up one side of the coin, Nihility which is IX oppose the reality as the opposite side of the coin, both sides made up a complete universe.That mean it oppose even HooH
Pretty sure “Web of Logic” for HooH and “Logic” for IX are qualified differently.
The first one pertains to the topology of Real Space (as literally explained in the text), i.e the movement of it’s constituents, whereas the second probably pertains to rationality (since existence is something meant to be understood but nonexistence not).
Would be very weird if IX is just not-P but also isn’t qualified for the polarity derived from the Law of Non-Contradiction.
Plus, there’s literally nothing in the narrative that implies IX is beyond logic in any sense aside from that singular line. So it’d really be veryyyyyyy weird if HooH and IX talk about the same thing.
Or if we’re reallyyy using our wanking spirit, we could also just say IX is nondual as well. Hehehe
So........the verse contradict itself?
Bro finally realized what a shithole Hoyo scaling is.
->Verse: HooH controls, sees, qualifies and envelops all things
->Also verse: Just another fraud doing jack
(I still think he’s the strongest btw, my mind hasn’t changed. I’m js not debating it any further cuz it’s irrelevant to the scaling atp)
So here’s what we do:
Either,
1) We admit the writers are illiterate monkeys and punish the verse for it (considering Shaoji tho, it might not be too farfetched an assumption)
or,
2) Steelman their writings and go with interpretations that make the most logical coherence (like separating the “logic” from HooH and IX)