Beyond logic and comprehension

[Ioffersomename12]

basicly two questions

1: what tier is "beyond logic"

2: what tier is "beyond comprehension"

 

[Lycoris4812]

Nothing by itself.

 

[Question_Man_I_guess]

It needs more context.

 

[Ioffersomename12]

It needs more context.

I mean the sentence is litterally "ıt is that which is beyond comprehension. It is that which is beyond human understanding"

 

[Question_Man_I_guess]

I mean the sentence is litterally "ıt is that which is beyond comprehension. It is that which is beyond human understanding"

On its own, I don't think it implies anything.
I can assume it MIGHT be of a high level, but there isn't enough evidence to categorize it into any tier, although it could serve as a feature for something higher.

 

[AKUTO123]

basicly two questions

1: what tier is "beyond logic"

2: what tier is "beyond comprehension"

Be logic itself = high 1A+ ( be three basic law of logic : the law of identity (LOI), the law of non-contradiction (LNC), and the law of excluded middle (LEM).[2] if it embodiment of that its high1A + if it beyond of that probably it just omnipotent and tier 0 or high 1A+ . But its need to context and proof for this

 

[AKUTO123]

Be logic itself = high 1A+ ( be three basic law of logic : the law of identity (LOI), the law of non-contradiction (LNC), and the law of excluded middle (LEM).[2] if it embodiment of that its high1A + if it beyond of that probably it just omnipotent and tier 0 or high 1A+ . But its need to context and proof for this

Note: just called its beyond logic dosent apply to high 1A+ even just lack one of law dosent result high 1A+

 

[Vietthai96]

Beyond logic doesn't mean anything on it own

 

[SuperNova55555]

Note: just called its beyond logic dosent apply to high 1A+ even just lack one of law dosent result high 1A+

Tier 0s aren’t beyond logic. Logic itself has nothing to do with their substantiality, nor would logic even ever be an ontological object.

 

[ScrollerGNL]

1) Nowhere because that is impossible.
2) Depends on context, generally +1D.

Be logic itself = high 1A+ ( be three basic law of logic : the law of identity (LOI), the law of non-contradiction (LNC), and the law of excluded middle (LEM).[2] if it embodiment of that its high1A + if it beyond of that probably it just omnipotent and tier 0 or high 1A+ . But its need to context and proof for this

Logic isn't an object, you can't "be logic". H1-A+ is simply just being a necessary existence or having abilities that allow for the affection of all possible worlds. Tier 0 isn't above logic, like, how do you think divine attribution works?

 

[AKUTO123]

Tier 0s aren’t beyond logic. Logic itself has nothing to do with their substantiality, nor would logic even ever be an ontological object.

Bro we talk about fiction you know this right? Tloi from dkd is literally itself of law of identity and even author confirm its itself of basic logic...

 

[SuperNova55555]

Bro we talk about fiction you know this right? Tloi from dkd is literally itself of law of identity and even author confirm its itself of basic logic...

It still doesn’t scale anywhere. Simply being A=A in some arbitrary sense is meaningless