• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about "Incontable finite number" in attack potency

Messages
58
Reaction score
1
In the Attack Potency, in 3-A, it says: "To any higher finite number".
Then, how would that be?
Would it have to specify a number greater than Quettaexafoe?
Or is it a count that's incalculable enough to put it in that category?
How would it work? Should it also specify that they destroy a finite universe?
Thanks for your answers!
 
It mean it go higher forever, but not reaching infinite, ad-infinitum
 
In the context of verse matches with another 3-A how much higher would we treat it?
Unqualifiable, unless you make a match a character that have concrete number, such as countless joules vs n-number joules. Though ad-infinitum > countless
 
I'll be a bit exaggerated with this.
Let's say Character A has an attack power equivalent to Quetta Quetta Quetta Quetta Quetta foe, but it only destroyed a city or an island. Does that still count as category 3-A?
Well, yeah, unless the statement is retconned or have proof that it is just flowery language (which is most of the time not). Since well always separate Area of Effect with Attack Potency
 
Well, yeah, unless the statement is retconned or have proof that it is just flowery language (which is most of the time not). Since well always separate Area of Effect with Attack Potency
But it can have that potency and it can have a low range? I mean. There is many characters with an attack potency of 4-B (or they are consider like that), but his range is a few meters, right?
 
Yeah, it will have a low range, unless you have proof that range can be scale from AP
 
Scaled from AP, mean you have proof that A have this level of AP, A too have the same level of range, kinda like that


But, if the narrator and many characters says that "the attack potency of a characters is equal to QuettaQuettaFoe"?
Still AP, not range if you want to ask
 
Scaled from AP, mean you have proof that A have this level of AP, A too have the same level of range, kinda like that



Still AP, not range if you want to ask
Sorry, I am new in this VS Wiki Forum. Do you have a page that talks/explains about AP?
For example: Character A and B have the same power described as "his attack power is equivalent to countless foes or Quetta Quetta Quetta foes." Character A can destroy entire universes through an external means (weapon, equipment, transformation), but Character B doesn't have that ability, yet he faces and defeats Character A.
So, Character A and B would belong to the same tier?
 
Sorry, I am new in this VS Wiki Forum. Do you have a page that talks/explains about AP?
For example: Character A and B have the same power described as "his attack power is equivalent to countless foes or Quetta Quetta Quetta foes." Character A can destroy entire universes through an external means (weapon, equipment, transformation), but Character B doesn't have that ability, yet he faces and defeats Character A.
So, Character A and B would belong to the same tier?
Ah AP is attack potency, right? Haha my bad.
But, the example with the characters it is okay?
 
Sorry, I am new in this VS Wiki Forum. Do you have a page that talks/explains about AP?
For example: Character A and B have the same power described as "his attack power is equivalent to countless foes or Quetta Quetta Quetta foes." Character A can destroy entire universes through an external means (weapon, equipment, transformation), but Character B doesn't have that ability, yet he faces and defeats Character A.
So, Character A and B would belong to the same tier?
A will have universal range, though if the universe is infinite his range will be High 3-A. Though his range applied only the external means, not his own inherrent ability

B however will not have the same range because range will not be scaled like AP, you need direct proof for range

A and B of course will have the same tier and AP
 
A will have universal range, though if the universe is infinite his range will be High 3-A. Though his range applied only the external means, not his own inherrent ability

B however will not have the same range because range will not be scaled like AP, you need direct proof for range

A and B of course will have the same tier and AP
And if the universe is finite? Then, the range will be Universal, right?
 
In short, if character A has an attack power described as "countless foe or joules without reaching infinity," it would be 3-A.
If character B with a similar attack power destroys a non-infinite universe, it would have Universal range, while if character A defeats it, not only would it be stronger, even if they belong to the same tier, but its range would be a few meters.
Am I okay with this?
 
In short, if character A has an attack power described as "countless foe or joules without reaching infinity," it would be 3-A.
If character B with a similar attack power destroys a non-infinite universe, it would have Universal range, while if character A defeats it, not only would it be stronger, even if they belong to the same tier, but its range would be a few meters.
Am I okay with this?
Yes
 
Back
Top