- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #41
FrNinjago as a franchize will end before CGM takes a look at this
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ninjago Planet size issue
- Thread starter Lloydblitzed
- Start date
Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,716
- 1,602
Deserved for putting useless link as proof of Astor city non canonicity. If you click on it, you see only Andreasen saying "no" to some deleted tweet. Use this link instead, put it on top of first post and shout "city used as reference for size is non-canonical, calc shouldn't be used", write CGM members on their profiles, and they would probably agree. No need to go about minimum size of habitable planets.
- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #43
Fixed
Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,716
- 1,602
Nice.
Damn, looking at it again, my rant sounds too harsh. I was just joking around.
Probably would try to summarise arguments for "planets can't be smaller than Cuba", with proper scientific backing.
StarShooter80
He/Him- 6,051
- 4,891
I definitely agree, an additional issue would be the gravity needing to be incredibly light. The opposing arguments don't hold up at all either, with half of it just bad mouthing OP or not having any real arguments against the debunk
- 7,271
- 6,735
so…did this pass or not?
- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #47
Not yet
- 6,248
- 4,028
No, cuz no CGM arrived here sadly.
Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,716
- 1,602
Let's start.
1. Assuming same density as Earth, Ninjago would have 107 times smaller surface gravity. I don't need to explain why this is wrong.
2. To get same surface gravity as Earth, Ninjago would have to have density of 600,000 kg/m^3(30 times greater than most densest materials). Let's roll with it.
3. Assuming same surface gravity, Ninjago planet would have escape velocity of 1.1 km/s(10 times smaller than Earth, 2 times smaller than Moon). It wouldn't be able to retain any kind of atmosphere at all.
I can continue this rant, but it's pretty obvious that Ninjago can't have diameter of 118 km. Given that this value itself comes from non-canonical source, it's better to disregard it completely, and stick to default policy (assume that Ninjago have same dimension as Earth).
- 1,549
- 591
I agree to this thread
- 11,266
- 10,110
In 50 years it will. Also go back to your old pfp fr
- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #52
lmao fr
Ghostimuscrime
He/Him- 3,678
- 3,958
Half this thread is about when and how long it’ll take to get evaluated and the other half is about the actual proposal
& it’s not even a controversial topic/verse
we NEED those CGM promos to come out asap
& it’s not even a controversial topic/verse
we NEED those CGM promos to come out asap
- 1,549
- 591
I find it weird that a calculation group staff consciously thought this made sense to begin with
- 12,034
- 15,547
Why are we assuming the planet is smaller than Earth to begin with?
I haven't seen any evidence in the calcs that this planet should be treated as tiny. Default assumption is that a planet is Earth size until we're given evidence of the contrary.
Note: I haven't taken a detailed look at either of the calcs, so I can't give an opinion on them right now.
I haven't seen any evidence in the calcs that this planet should be treated as tiny. Default assumption is that a planet is Earth size until we're given evidence of the contrary.
Note: I haven't taken a detailed look at either of the calcs, so I can't give an opinion on them right now.
Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,716
- 1,602
Due to use of fan created(with help of one of the show creators) map. Obviously it's non-canonical
- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #57
Honestly yeah. We should just use default Earth size assumption
- 6,248
- 4,028
Just as a note: as I clarified in the beginning of the thread, my calc (which is presented in “solution”) does assume that planet is as big as Earth, and based off that assumption, it merely estimates the “continents” of Ninjago as the continents are clearly different from real world (it is simply a land that FSM split in two during Stone Wars in the past).
- 6,248
- 4,028
Bump?
- 6,618
- 3,528
- Thread starter
- #60
Is this concluded?
- 6,248
- 4,028
Idk
Ghostimuscrime
He/Him- 3,678
- 3,958
2 CGM votes are required to replace an old calculation, so gotta get one more vote
- 11,266
- 10,110
Bump
Ghostimuscrime
He/Him- 3,678
- 3,958
No need to bump, ya got 2 votes, this is accepted go get it closed
- 11,266
- 10,110
Oh lol. I thought it had 1 for some reason
Similar threads
- Locked
