- 11,286
- 10,144
- Thread starter
- #41
Love how Sunday has to do allat to become an Aeon. Meanwhile Aha laughed at a baby falling off a tree and crying and became an Aeon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean, Aha had to travel to the highest branch of the Imaginary Tree as the first step to become an AeonLove how Sunday has to do allat to become an Aeon. Meanwhile Aha laughed at a baby falling off a tree and crying and became an Aeon.
Thanks!I was asked to comment here.
Not familiar with this verse, though, reading the text of the opening post, it seems reasonable enough to give my tentative to approval to it, & skimming the thread, I didn't see much contention or controversy. If, on the contrary, there is some conflict, please construct a conversation congenally to bring it to attention.
Hope this helps!
Is there any evidence of that newly born aeon being Sunday? I disagree with this CRT since Sunday will never ever become an Aeon. The Nascent Aeon in the context of Penacony isn't Sunday ascending godhood but rather Ena merged with Order path and reborn as new path of aeon.Sunday successfully turned himself into a shell of an egg. The Embryo of Philosophy. In this state, he is a newborn slumbering Aeon waiting to be awakened and ascend into Aeonhood as the Aeon of Philosophy. This is also confirmed in 3.1 where it was stated that the Trailblazer defeated a Nascent Aeon (referring to Sunday)
And in the cutscene, you can see sunday is reaching out a hand in the sky. The hand has the color and patterns of both Ena and Xipe.Oh, Ena (Aeon)... may you return! Awaken, judge of the world!
The important word is "an Aeon succmbed to slumber once more" and "this time, the Aeon met THEIR demise with dignity". This is very important cuz we all know that Ena didn't die with dignity. But rather they were cast into oblivion by their own creations. So, this time their demise is with dignity because it's a clash of philosophy rather than casting away your own creator. The wording "Slumber once more" clearly indicate, the nascent aeon is an existing aeon who was slumbered instead of Sunday becoming an Aeon. That's absurb.Whispers carried the tale of those fateful 48 system hours, when a sun teetered on the precipice of collapse, a paradise stood on the brink of destruction, and a world was poised to surrender to its new master. Amidst it all, a body decayed, a pack of vultures gathered, and a brother and sister were doomed for long separation.
And so, an Aeon succumbed to slumber once more. Some celebrated this fall, while others mourned. Among the insignificant witnesses, mere specks in the vast tapestry of the universe, it was said that this time, the Aeon met THEIR demise with dignity.
Hm…wouldnt he still merge with ena as well or is that only applicable to them aloneIs there any evidence of that newly born aeon being Sunday? I disagree with this CRT since Sunday will never ever become an Aeon. The Nascent Aeon in the context of Penacony isn't Sunday ascending godhood but rather Ena merged with Order path and reborn as new path of aeon.
Why? In the "Im Anfang war die Tat" stage of Sunday boss fight in 2.2 Penacony, the dialogue from Sunday said this.
And in the cutscene, you can see sunday is reaching out a hand in the sky. The hand has the color and patterns of both Ena and Xipe.
He is calling it out to return who is in this case "Ena", judge of the world. So, it's pretty clear it isn't him. Another evidence is this.
This is the narration after the end of Sunday Boss Fight after he lost.
The important word is "an Aeon succmbed to slumber once more" and "this time, the Aeon met THEIR demise with dignity". This is very important cuz we all know that Ena didn't die with dignity. But rather they were cast into oblivion by their own creations. So, this time their demise is with dignity because it's a clash of philosophy rather than casting away your own creator. The wording "Slumber once more" clearly indicate, the nascent aeon is an existing aeon who was slumbered instead of Sunday becoming an Aeon. That's absurb.
For the staffs, please read this and make your own decision. I was busy so I didn't see this CRT so I was late. Hope you guys re evaluate with this in mind
Whether will he merge with Ena or not is a question without answer. We have no way of knowing right now. About resurrection part, it's not just his power alone. It's the wishes of the people.Hm…wouldnt he still merge with ena as well or is that only applicable to them alone
like when i read this scans i felt like sunday. (or dominicus in this case) would eventually merge with Ena and then we would have Ena get ressurected as aeon of order, if this is the case he csn just get eventually rating as “ressurected Ena” and just link their profile
If we consider those who directly or indirectly created Aeons as the same level as THEM, Zandar will be Aeon level too which doesn't make sense. The whole thing about Harmony is people becoming aware of the controls of order and uniting together to cast the creator away hence forming a new path. I still don't agree Sunday becoming or merging Aeon at all.Materialized as the Hive Mind's response to wishes, the hymns he conducts can reshape the world and create new laws per the wishes, and all who made this wish will become the source of his power.
(collective unconcious moment)Whether will he merge with Ena or not is a question without answer. We have no way of knowing right now. About resurrection part, it's not just his power alone. It's the wishes of the people.
If we consider those who directly or indirectly created Aeons as the same level as THEM, Zandar will be Aeon level too which doesn't make sense. The whole thing about Harmony is people becoming aware of the controls of order and uniting together to cast the creator away hence forming a new path. I still don't agree Sunday becoming or merging Aeon at all.
Whether will he merge with Ena or not is a question without answer. We have no way of knowing right now. About resurrection part, it's not just his power alone. It's the wishes of the people.
It's true that he controls over the power of the wishes but he will never become an Aeon since the newborn Aeon is Ena + Harmony rather than Sunday ascending godhood. Sunday ressurecting Ena is not his power alone, it's rather the hive mind. And the formation of new philosophy goes much deeper than ressurecting Aeon = have Aeon scale. So, still hard disagree for this.But he’s still the one who united those people, and he’s still the one who has control over their power, right? It could be something like, “With the wishes of the people of Penacony, Sunday eventually can become a nascent Aeon.”
Sure, Sunday wouldn’t be as strong without the people’s wishes, but with their wishes, he became that powerful. That’s why, in the Penacony quest, we’d rather stop the people from making those wishes than try to defeat Sunday right away.
Well, rather than resurrecting an Aeon, I think he just wants to resurrect the Path of Order, since he never said he wanted to resurrect an Aeon or become one.It's true that he controls over the power of the wishes but he will never become an Aeon since the newborn Aeon is Ena + Harmony rather than Sunday ascending godhood. Sunday ressurecting Ena is not his power alone, it's rather the hive mind. And the formation of new philosophy goes much deeper than ressurecting Aeon = have Aeon scale. So, still hard disagree for this..
But he just wants to use Order to make people happy.Sunday: It seems you have misunderstood my intentions. Allow me to clarify — My desire is not to resurrect a fallen Aeon or become one myself.
So yeah, Sunday wants to become an entity like an Aeon with the help of Ena (Order). I don’t know if he has an Aeon’s physiology or not, but he would definitely be as strong as one if he succeeded.Sunday: My sole objective is to create a paradise free from Aeons, where the Order ensures the dignity and happiness of all humanity. A paradise exclusive to us human beings.
The perfect version of Zandar is Aeon level, because the perfect version of Zandar is practically Nous themselvesIf we consider those who directly or indirectly created Aeons as the same level as THEM, Zandar will be Aeon level too which doesn't make sense. The whole thing about Harmony is people becoming aware of the controls of order and uniting together to cast the creator away hence forming a new path. I still don't agree Sunday becoming or merging Aeon at all.
I think they made it clear here by adding the "(or rather, a version of you stripped of human imperfections)" and "(as imperfect as you are)" that well: The First Genius is the imperfect Zandar, the one stripped of human imperfections is Nous themselves
Perfect Version of Zandar doesn't equal to Human Original Version of Zandar who created his perfection self (Nous). That's a play of words. Original Zandar was no where near Nous's level. Nous can easily peer into his mind and haunt him. If OG Zandar who created an Aeon was on the same level of energy output as the Aeon, he will just kill Nous on his own.The perfect version of Zandar is Aeon level, because the perfect version of Zandar is practically Nous themselves
For a human to ascend into an Aeon, they must embody the path completely. Sunday was just combining all the wishes of the people to revive Ena with different path.It's not really that shocking when you know, Nanook ascended as an Aeon of Destruction whilst he was just a mere mortal like Khaslana back then. The entire Amphoreus stuff, I'm sure it was meant to replicate that feat. Zandar knew about it
Well, rather than resurrecting an Aeon, I think he just wants to resurrect the Path of Order, since he never said he wanted to resurrect an Aeon or become one.
He did revive Ena and Ena is dead again, that's a hard fact. The narration at the end wasn't from news broadcast but rather by someone else possibly Elio. Anything more is just no more than assumptions with no facts in it. If vsb allow theories or assumptions to work on AP, sure why not. I have nothing to say thenSo yeah, Sunday wants to become an entity like an Aeon with the help of Ena (Order). I don’t know if he has an Aeon’s physiology or not, but he would definitely be as strong as one if he succeeded.
And Original Zandar is still capable of making Irontomb that actually has the potential to kill Nous and Erudition by changing all of their extrapolations into DestructionPerfect Version of Zandar doesn't equal to Human Original Version of Zandar who created his perfection self (Nous). That's a play of words. Original Zandar was no where near Nous's level. Nous can easily peer into his mind and haunt him. If OG Zandar who created an Aeon was on the same level of energy output as the Aeon, he will just kill Nous on his own.
Phase 3 Description about Harmonious ChoirFor a human to ascend into an Aeon, they must embody the path completely. Sunday was just combining all the wishes of the people to revive Ena with different path.
We have 1-B listed on the profiles for Emanators because they have the potential to kill their own Aeon like Irontomb, Acheron, Evernight and so on that's why they're listed as that through the Path of Remembrance in AP specifically. That's enough I suppose, you don't really need to kill the Aeon directly when Khaslana managed to wound Nanook themselves, getting the last blessing of Destruction and hence became a fully fledged Emanator of Destruction. The English version specifically stated that it's the real Nanook with The Herta saying it, either way due to that avatar key thread that was rejected which the proposal is to separate the true form of an Aeon with the avatar — As of now, the true form of an Aeon and the avatar are on the same level (1-B) unless we make a 1-A proposal in which the avatar is 1-B and the latter is 1-AHe did revive Ena and Ena is dead again, that's a hard fact. The narration at the end wasn't from news broadcast but rather by someone else possibly Elio. Anything more is just no more than assumptions with no facts in it. If vsb allow theories or assumptions to work on AP, sure why not. I have nothing to say then
Irontomb is capable of killing Nous because he was one of the neurons of Nous. And no Zandar didn't create Amphoreus Secpter. And Amphoreus is no mere Secepter but rather an Emperor's Scepter. These scepter by itself are designed to simulate towards destruction path.And Original Zandar is still capable of making Irontomb that actually has the potential to kill Nous and Erudition by changing all of their extrapolations into Destruction
So yeah your claim is wrongScrewllum: Are any of you familiar with... the Emperor's Scepter?
Herta: A colossal system among Emperor Rubert II's collection of scepters, operated by antilife equations and created to simulate destruction scenarios for innumerable civilizations...
Nothing in there indicates Sunday will become an AeonPhase 3 Description about Harmonious Choir
I don't really mind Phainon getting 1-B for wounding Nanook but others having the same scale just because they are also emanators is wonky. The whole idea about Phainon's destruction is the destruction of the destruction itself. That's why he is able to damage THE DESTRUCTION. I can't see other doing the same. Yeah, people be talking about "I'm gonna kill this aeon and that" but can they really do it? It's still a possibility as of right now. Even Irontomb is just still in its egg and Irontomb is specially designed to infect Nous. But will Nous let that happen? will it work? There're a lot of questions we can make and that makes the scaling unsure. So yeah, I agree with Phaion 1-B and others? No!We have 1-B listed on the profiles for Emanators because they have the potential to kill their own Aeon like Irontomb, Acheron, Evernight and so on that's why they're listed as that through the Path of Remembrance in AP specifically. That's enough I suppose, you don't really need to kill the Aeon directly when Khaslana managed to wound Nanook themselves, getting the last blessing of Destruction and hence became a fully fledged Emanator of Destruction. The English version specifically stated that it's the real Nanook with The Herta saying it, either way due to that avatar key thread that was rejected which the proposal is to separate the true form of an Aeon with the avatar — As of now, the true form of an Aeon and the avatar are on the same level (1-B) unless we make a 1-A proposal in which the avatar is 1-B and the latter is 1-A
That still doesn't change the fact that Acheron and Evernight are capable, if Zandar isn't on the same level then he wouldn't even know about it firsthand regardless. It's still considered the same level, just through technological means. Literally he was able to create Nous anyway.Irontomb is capable of killing Nous because he was one of the neurons of Nous. And no Zandar didn't create Amphoreus Secpter. And Amphoreus is no mere Secepter but rather an Emperor's Scepter. These scepter by itself are designed to simulate towards destruction path.
So yeah your claim is wrong
Nothing in there indicates Sunday will become an Aeon
I don't really mind Phainon getting 1-B for wounding Nanook but others having the same scale just because they are also emanators is wonky. The whole idea about Phainon's destruction is the destruction of the destruction itself. That's why he is able to damage THE DESTRUCTION. I can't see other doing the same. Yeah, people be talking about "I'm gonna kill this aeon and that" but can they really do it? It's still a possibility as of right now. Even Irontomb is just still in its egg and Irontomb is specially designed to infect Nous. But will Nous let that happen? will it work? There're a lot of questions we can make and that makes the scaling unsure. So yeah, I agree with Phaion 1-B and others? No!
Do tell me how Acheron and Evernight are capable? Just because they said so? Are you serious? To be honest Zandar didn't even create Nous as it's now. All he created was a super computer which can evolve itself. By evolving itself Nous became an Aeon which is unrelated to Zandar's own power. Nous became an Aeon not because it's a machine meant to query all knowledge in the universe but by doing so it will embody the Erudition path along the way which is something Zandar didn't intend to do. That's why he is trying to destroy it.That still doesn't change the fact that Acheron and Evernight are capable, if Zandar isn't on the same level then he wouldn't even know about it firsthand regardless. It's still considered the same level, just through technological means. Literally he was able to create Nous anyway.
The other stuff that supports Harmonious Choir will become an Aeon is already on the thread, if that's not clear enough for you.
The whole idea of Emanator getting 1-B other than their potential in the first place is because they're deemed way more stronger than Pseudo-Emanators or Pathstriders below them which is supported by HSR itself when they described Emanators and it's been shown consistently nonetheless.
Emantors getting 1-B just because they're stronger than pseudo-emanators and pathstriders is much much more wonky than scaling Emanators to Aeons. Yes, they are stronger but there's nothing to quantify it. It's just an estimate that they are much stronger than average Joes. But who knows how much like even in the Emanators, the power balance is very unbalanced.Not familiar with this verse, though, reading the text of the opening post, it seems reasonable enough to give my tentative to approval to it, & skimming the thread, I didn't see much contention or controversy. If, on the contrary, there is some conflict, please construct a conversation congenally to bring it to attention.
Hope this helps!
I don’t know how Ena appearance is a problem when Ena is the Aeon that represents Order.He did revive Ena and Ena is dead again, that's a hard fact. The narration at the end wasn't from news broadcast but rather by someone else possibly Elio. Anything more is just no more than assumptions with no facts in it. If vsb allow theories or assumptions to work on AP, sure why not. I have nothing to say then
And Sunday wants to achieve his goals with the help of Order.
Moreover, I already brought up the dialogue where Sunday himself said that he doesn’t want to resurrect the fallen Aeons, which refers to EnaSunday: That is what I want to do Unite people's happiness under the banner of Order. They won't need to make bitter choices any longer, nor face the weaknesses of humanity. They can cast aside their primal instincts, to build a haven for mankind.
But even though he said himself that he doesn’t want to become like the Aeons, he’s actually not that different from them.Sunday: It seems you have misunderstood my intentions. Allow me to clarify — My desire is not to resurrect a fallen Aeon or become one myself.
Sunday: My sole objective is to create a paradise free from Aeons, where the Order ensures the dignity and happiness of all humanity. A paradise exclusive to us human beings.
Sunday: That is what I want to do: Unite people's happiness under the banner of Order. They won't need to make bitter choices any longer, nor face the weaknesses of humanity. They can cast aside their primal instincts, to build a haven for mankind.
I don’t get why it’s such a big deal that HoYo didn’t explicitly say “Sunday will become an Aeon,” when the entire Penacony quest of 2.2 already shows that Sunday can become one if not stopped at the right time — and the game itself even states that the Trailblazer toppled an almost nascent Aeon, which clearly refers to Sunday.
No they don’t lol? Using Iron tomb or any Lord ravager as basis here does NOT work because they are unique cases, Acherons goal of killing IX does not mean anything.And Original Zandar is still capable of making Irontomb that actually has the potential to kill Nous and Erudition by changing all of their extrapolations into Destruction
Phase 3 Description about Harmonious Choir
We have 1-B listed on the profiles for Emanators because they have the potential to kill their own Aeon like Irontomb, Acheron, Evernight and so on that's why they're listed as that through the Path of Remembrance in AP specifically. That's enough I suppose, you don't really need to kill the Aeon directly when Khaslana managed to wound Nanook themselves, getting the last blessing of Destruction and hence became a fully fledged Emanator of Destruction. The English version specifically stated that it's the real Nanook with The Herta saying it, either way due to that avatar key thread that was rejected which the proposal is to separate the true form of an Aeon with the avatar — As of now, the true form of an Aeon and the avatar are on the same level (1-B) unless we make a 1-A proposal in which the avatar is 1-B and the latter is 1-A
If you discard the argument entirely because it's nonsensical to you then yes, though you didn't say anything about Evernight that being saidNo they don’t lol? Using Iron tomb or any Lord ravager as basis here does NOT work because they are unique cases, Acherons goal of killing IX does not mean anything.
“Of course it doesn’t mean anything if you’re just going to discard it cause you don’t like it.” The argument in itself does not make any sense lol, not because “I don’t like it.” Not all Emanators are on the same level of power, if they were? Your argument would have some sort of credibility to it. But that just isn’t the case and if we argue “Well uhm they have a goal to kill their Aeon so err they should scale clearly cuz errr.” Okay that’s fine, then that means annihilation gang trash should also be capable of killing their Aeon since that’s their goals after all?If you discard the argument entirely because it's nonsensical to you then yes, though you didn't say anything about Evernight that being said
Of course it wouldn't mean anything if you're just going to discard it cause you just, don't like it? Like what's your point
Emanators are on the same level of power, it's just that the means for those are different like how Destruction Emanators are just through brute force, Remembrance and Nihility through hax and Erudition through technological means. Annihilation gang is a lost cause, it's literally strawman because genuinely NOWHERE was it stated their goal is to kill an Aeon“Of course it doesn’t mean anything if you’re just going to discard it cause you don’t like it.” The argument in itself does not make any sense lol, not because “I don’t like it.” Not all Emanators are on the same level of power, if they were? Your argument would have some sort of credibility to it. But that just isn’t the case and if we argue “Well uhm they have a goal to kill their Aeon so err they should scale clearly cuz errr.” Okay that’s fine, then that means annihilation gang trash should also be capable of killing their Aeon since that’s their goals after all?
Ehhhhh... They once tried to kill IX, but were never seen again after they went for that mission, but that's itEmanators are on the same level of power, it's just that the means for those are different like how Destruction Emanators are just through brute force, Remembrance and Nihility through hax and Erudition through technological means. Annihilation gang is a lost cause, it's literally strawman because genuinely NOWHERE was it stated their goal is to kill an Aeon
No they aren’t lol??? Aelenev is the PRIME example of this, read up on them and tell me with a straight face someone like Herta without prep or Jing yuan is beating that thing, considering that Nanook had to PERSONALLY kill them and we know they’re willing to send their Lord ravagers to fight (Zephyro and Phainon). And to head onto your second point? No it wasn’t a strawman you clearly haven’t watched the Myriad Celestia as that directly implied that they have their own goals of taking down Aeons? To add to this, the Trailblazers goal is to beat Nanook too btw? If you genuinely think we can beat them or scale to THEM in any way shape or form as of right now? You’re cooked. Anyways, your argument is literally “Well er it’s their goal and they don’t have any feats of fighting any Aeons but errr? It’s their goal” Like what???Emanators are on the same level of power, it's just that the means for those are different like how Destruction Emanators are just through brute force, Remembrance and Nihility through hax and Erudition through technological means. Annihilation gang is a lost cause, it's literally strawman because genuinely NOWHERE was it stated their goal is to kill an Aeon
On what basis? Just because HSR fandom wiki linked the word into Embryo of Philosophy? After I showed y'all the proof that the Nascent Aeon in this context is not Sunday in new form but rather Ena with Order Path as you can see how Embryo of Philosophy Sunday calling out to THEM aswhen they toppled an almost Nascent Aeon, which is clearly about the Embryo of Philosophy?
And Ena's hand reaching out to him. And the narrator clearly explaining that newborn Aeon is an Aeon that once existed before which is Ena and clearly not Sunday.Oh, Ena (Aeon)... may you return! Awaken, judge of the world!
Whispers carried the tale of those fateful 48 system hours, when a sun teetered on the precipice of collapse, a paradise stood on the brink of destruction, and a world was poised to surrender to its new master. Amidst it all, a body decayed, a pack of vultures gathered, and a brother and sister were doomed for long separation.
And so, an Aeon succumbed to slumber once more. Some celebrated this fall, while others mourned. Among the insignificant witnesses, mere specks in the vast tapestry of the universe, it was said that this time, the Aeon met THEIR demise with dignity.
Well, the most prominent example of the usage of "eventually XYZ Tier" are this profile and this CRTI don't think I've ever seen a profile write "eventually XYZ tier" instead...
1-B overtime with The Embryo of Philosophy (Justification about how Sunday will eventually become an Aeon)
...seems much more fitting for our formatting standards.
Everything else is fine.
Eventually XYZ tier mean a hypothetical state that the character could reach in the future; in most cases is if the character isn't stopped by something or someoneI don't think I've ever seen a profile write "eventually XYZ tier" instead...
Overtime mean thing happen overtime, which mean a character is capable of doing X feat but take time, This implies they was already be able to do such feat, which contrast with eventually tier which imply the level a character could reach in the future in a different scenario1-B overtime
I see, if that's the case, eventually is fine then.Eventually XYZ tier mean a hypothetical state that the character could reach in the future; in most cases is if the character isn't stopped by something or someone
Overtime mean thing happen overtime, which mean a character is capable of doing X feat but take time, This implies they was already be able to do such feat, which contrast with eventually tier which imply the level a character could reach in the future in a different scenario
Also, 1-B overtime is kinda, moot, because 1-B is higher infinity, 1-B overtime is just flat out 1-B