• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Revenant Marvel Comics Discussion Thread

Is the author statement for everything being a Universal manifestation even reliable at this point?
They show Eternity and Oblivion as inferior to the Living Tribunal, so they are definitely inside of Multi-Eternity, then it is said that Eternity abandoned the universe and if it was Multi-Eternity it couldn't be, the House of Ideas was moved somewhere, so it can't be the residence of the true form of The One Above All. They continue to talk about the universe, I don't recall them even mentioning the Multiverse
 
The Storm comicbooks are not remotely my favourite stories either. Just hollowly written ridiculously enormous power-inflation for the sake of itself, and no other point whatsoever, and the black winter is now supposedly retconned into just being one of many such servants of the Mesopotamian thunder deity Hadad, for the sole purpose of undermining Thor and making him a fourth rate Storm.

This seems like extremely petty and narrative-breaking storytelling by somebody who has read way too much Lionel Suggs or similar writers.

The only positive thing I can say about it, is that if Marvel Comics absolutely has to promote an official Mary Sue/Gary Stu, at least Storm is a less awful choice than Thanos used to be.

Let's hope that Storm eventually gets Jim Starlin's Thanos treatment with "it was all just a dream" or "it was a practical joke by the One Above All to see if Storm would turn into a hollow ranting egomaniac", which she did, or similar, but that seems unlikely. 🙏
 
black winter
I already didn't like the addition of the Black Winter and the retcon of Galactus as its herald, it would have been okay if the Black Winter just was the tool used by the Beyonders to destroy the old Cosmo and create a new one.
retconned into just being one of many such servants of the Mesopotamian thunder deity Hadad
The fact is that this comicbook is strange as to how it treats the Abstracts, technically these should be Universal aspects of the Black Winter, while the one Thor killed was a Multiversal one, but this comicbook keeps treating multiversal aspects of the Marvel's cosmology as part of the single Earth-616. I mean, is this a retcon of the whole cosmology and now we have universal aspects of every being, TOAA included?
 
I feel like Abstracts are getting nerfed hard. Like it kinda feels like there isn't a gap at all between Skyfather and Abstract levels at all anymore. For how much Thor has been done dirty power-wise, he seems to me to be treated as on the same level as Goddess Storm and Wanda.

Also should characters like Storm and Scarlet Witch have keys for their current states? Aren't they both much more powerful than they used to be.
 
The Storm comicbooks are not remotely my favourite stories either. Just hollowly written ridiculously enormous power-inflation for the sake of itself, and no other point whatsoever, and the black winter is now supposedly retconned into just being one of many such servants of the Mesopotamian thunder deity Hadad, for the sole purpose of undermining Thor and making him a fourth rate Storm.

This seems like extremely petty and narrative-breaking storytelling by somebody who has read way too much Lionel Suggs or similar writers.

The only positive thing I can say about it, is that if Marvel Comics absolutely has to promote an official Mary Sue/Gary Stu, at least Storm is a less awful choice than Thanos used to be.

Let's hope that Storm eventually gets Jim Starlin's Thanos treatment with "it was all just a dream" or "it was a practical joke by the One Above All to see if Storm would turn into a hollow ranting egomaniac", which she did, or similar, but that seems unlikely. 🙏
I think it’s funny how this isn’t even that narrative-breaking (to, at least, our narrative) compared to what Hickman did since it’s the equivalent of “sandbox writing” effectively. You can just bend over backwards to say things like “actually every universe has a copy of the multiverse, just scaled down!” to get around this, and it might work, in terms of actually not just blowing up what we currently accept and how the standards work in applying those accepted things.

(Meanwhile Hickman’s whole Dominion stuff is actually just a huge anti-feat for the entire cosmology having 1-A stuff, which was never really addressed here. Although that’s neither here nor there…)
 
(Meanwhile Hickman’s whole Dominion stuff is actually just a huge anti-feat for the entire cosmology having 1-A stuff, which was never really addressed here. Although that’s neither here nor there…)
Please elaborate. I also think that we are likely greatly exaggerating the scale of the cosmology by stacking all contradictory interpretations by different writers on top of each other. 🙏
 
Please elaborate. I also think that we are likely greatly exaggerating the scale of the cosmology by stacking all contradictory interpretations by different writers on top of each other. 🙏
Dominions are just super-AIs that have amassed so much computational power that they are capable of simulating entire universes and jumping throughout them without heeding linearity, reaching a point of processing that the energy capacity of their computation collapses the space-time around them into a singularity. Hickman then has multiple Dominions combined together into a super-Dominion (the Enigma) who is beyond the abstracts and can only be challenged by the Phoenix Force effectively.

The issue is then having an abstract level being just being a giant computer capable of scaling arbitrarily high into the cosmic hierarchy by just having more computer-“stuff” than anything else put together, so that it can do more math than anything else capable of doing math. This would clearly cap at L1-A, which would, of course, bring down the entire cosmology with it.

I don’t know how exactly you would keep this stuff without just breaking the entire setting as we accept it… maybe split Marvel into “Hickman” and “Ewing” cosmologies, lol…
 
Dominions are just super-AIs that have amassed so much computational power that they are capable of simulating entire universes and jumping throughout them without heeding linearity, reaching a point of processing that the energy capacity of their computation collapses the space-time around them into a singularity. Hickman then has multiple Dominions combined together into a super-Dominion (the Enigma) who is beyond the abstracts and can only be challenged by the Phoenix Force effectively.

The issue is then having an abstract level being just being a giant computer capable of scaling arbitrarily high into the cosmic hierarchy by just having more computer-“stuff” than anything else put together, so that it can do more math than anything else capable of doing math. This would clearly cap at L1-A, which would, of course, bring down the entire cosmology with it.

I don’t know how exactly you would keep this stuff without just breaking the entire setting as we accept it… maybe split Marvel into “Hickman” and “Ewing” cosmologies, lol…
@Elizio33 @Qawsedf234 @Emirp sumitpo

What do you think that we should do? 🙏
 
Dominions are just super-AIs that have amassed so much computational power that they are capable of simulating entire universes and jumping throughout them without heeding linearity, reaching a point of processing that the energy capacity of their computation collapses the space-time around them into a singularity. Hickman then has multiple Dominions combined together into a super-Dominion (the Enigma) who is beyond the abstracts and can only be challenged by the Phoenix Force effectively.

The issue is then having an abstract level being just being a giant computer capable of scaling arbitrarily high into the cosmic hierarchy by just having more computer-“stuff” than anything else put together, so that it can do more math than anything else capable of doing math. This would clearly cap at L1-A, which would, of course, bring down the entire cosmology with it.

I don’t know how exactly you would keep this stuff without just breaking the entire setting as we accept it… maybe split Marvel into “Hickman” and “Ewing” cosmologies, lol…
@The_Impress

Your input would also be appreciated here. 🙏
 
Personally I don't like the idea of cosmology splits at all. I don't think we should split anything that isn't a canonical difference
Yeah, I was being somewhat facetious there, if you couldn’t tell. I think we should generally avoid another possible disaster with splitting everything which other settings have experienced simply because of their own attempted solutions to problems like these…

Maybe a more general codification change with regard to how we regard anti-feats to long running series would be better? Because as it is now, one instance of disqualification can just blow everything else up immediately. And you can’t just shaft it into its own corner either, since there’s still a semblance of mainline continuity, and it’s not like this is some one-off story.
 
Last edited:
Personally I don't like the idea of cosmology splits at all. I don't think we should split anything that isn't a canonical difference
Although I dislike splits, I feel like sometimes it can be a better approach than repeating the same discussions time and time again because of inconsistencies.

Marvel doesn't has a solid cosmology that is unchanging, it's always changing and being retconned, sometimes for bigger stuff, other times it becomes more limited. There are times the universe is portrayed with infinities upon infinities, and other times in which it being finite is an important plot point.

Naturally, some attempts have been made to unify some cosmologies, but even those attempts aren't absolute and they themselves can have their elements set in levels that were not indented originally.

Because saying there's no "canonical difference" isn't really right, the difference in canons is very clear. The only thing that isn't official is the names and "authors related to X cosmology", those are things that are decided by each fan, but knowing that different writers portray marvel and its characters differently is a very clear thing that has been recognized many times, going beyond even singular writers even into editorial. There were times in which Marvel has an editorial that is very certain about a certain lore that needs to be followed, and other times in which that isn't the case.

If someone attempts to make a singular "Marvel cosmology" that is impossible because of inconsistencies, then choices need to be made. Deciding what it a retcon or not, where each thing is in the cosmological hierarchy, which cosmic being is above the other, these are things that are all over the place so even deciding in one over the other is already making a personal choice.

I would say that the cosmology split is a way of at least acknowledging all these different inconsistent point of views as valid to their own, and although some elements are incorporated by others, it's not done without some level of retconning for example.

Naturally, making such choices would need a lot of research and nuanced discussion on Marvel, but I wouldn't say it's something that is absurd, just one of the many consequences of having a widely contradictory work.
 
I don't really have a problem with splitting, but I don't like how easy it is becoming. It makes sense of there are many contradictions but at least the marvel one there were pretty much none, the whole argument was that those characters simply don't show up anywhere else, but that's literally what happens almost every time that the writer changes. If it becomes too easy it will start being a split for every new writer because he/she decided to ignore the previous stories.
 
Aside, this reminds me of the guy writing Miles Morales as a shonen MC (which, to be fair, kinda works for him) where he gets a bunch of powers like lightning laser swords, dialed to 11. The issue with this is that as soon as these people leave these books editorial is going to have to deal with the problem of why these characters don’t just solve everything since they’re uber-duper-powerful, which is one of the issues Ewing tried to deal with while coming after Cates for Thor.
 
Me reading the newest issue of One World Under Doom: Damn, Doom is making some excellent points about the failures of all the heroes, why is this guy a villain again-
Turns out he's harvesting a million Latverians' souls to fuel his magic
...Oh that's why.

(Note: He's not killing the Latverians, but it's clear that they're in extreme pain)
 
World under doom #6 just came out

Reed Challanges Doom into a argument fight.
Marie Hill somehow "magically" discovered a weakness in Doom's shield to let avengers get in.
As expected Doom was doing evil stuff sacrificing people to fuel powerful magics.
I saw somebody claim that last one might have been mandated by Tom Breevort, as it apparently contradicts how Doom was depicted in stuff like Blood Hunt and Doom Academy, but I haven't read any of these comics, so I can't really say much...
 
I saw somebody claim that last one might have been mandated by Tom Breevort, as it apparently contradicts how Doom was depicted in stuff like Blood Hunt and Doom Academy, but I haven't read any of these comics, so I can't really say much...
He bombs Shelbyville earlier in the OWUD arc with a nuke just to punish Winter Soldier for trying to sabotage his plans.
 
Regarding Dominions, they are weird, yes. But not cosmology breaking weird I think. I always assumed they just exist as information so pure that they transcend into the Overspace.
Besides, our wiki already recognises Asgardian Gods as myth turned into reality by mankind’s belief. In turn, Dominions are made by combining millions of minds, and are similarly stated to be Digital Gods, so it’s not that of a stretch (Especially with the Natural-Order-of-Things being a new machine-representing Abstract).
 
Me reading the newest issue of One World Under Doom: Damn, Doom is making some excellent points about the failures of all the heroes, why is this guy a villain again-
Turns out he's harvesting a million Latverians' souls to fuel his magic
...Oh that's why.

(Note: He's not killing the Latverians, but it's clear that they're in extreme pain)
Doom's points are also full of crap when you realize that he's guilty for doing the exact same things. He could peacefully share his advancements with the world but instead he limits it to Latveria and uses everything else to kill the Fantastic Four and/or take over the world. Even when he had the power to shape the multiverse to his whims he ended up making the absolute nightmare hellhole that was Battleworld instead of making an actual utopia.
 
Regarding Dominions, they are weird, yes. But not cosmology breaking weird I think. I always assumed they just exist as information so pure that they transcend into the Overspace.
Besides, our wiki already recognises Asgardian Gods as myth turned into reality by mankind’s belief. In turn, Dominions are made by combining millions of minds, and are similarly stated to be Digital Gods, so it’s not that of a stretch (Especially with the Natural-Order-of-Things being a new machine-representing Abstract).
Yeah, the method of them getting to Overspace would be the problem there, since the idea is that they accumulate so much computing power that they effectively “fall through” reality due to generating so much density, falling so far through they land outside of space-time itself. The way Hickman formats it is that there’s a “critical density” of intelligence you can accumulate, and once you have enough super-minds together you become a Dominion, and you can add Dominions up to get super-Dominions (like Enigma). Of course, adding arbitrarily large quantities of one specific substance (in this case, compute) would never be able to reach 1-A levels on its own, especially if this transformation was done specifically through reaching such a threshold of generating infinite density and “unmooring” yourself from relativistic space-time.
 
Doom's points are also full of crap when you realize that he's guilty for doing the exact same things. He could peacefully share his advancements with the world but instead he limits it to Latveria and uses everything else to kill the Fantastic Four and/or take over the world. Even when he had the power to shape the multiverse to his whims he ended up making the absolute nightmare hellhole that was Battleworld instead of making an actual utopia.
And he barely shares his stuff with Latveria either (though modern comics seem to make Latveria a developed country finally).

Compare that to Ultimate Latveria which is stated to be the 9th biggest economy and is incredibly advanced (even if Doom uses tech to control the population)
 
I saw somebody claim that last one might have been mandated by Tom Breevort, as it apparently contradicts how Doom was depicted in stuff like Blood Hunt and Doom Academy, but I haven't read any of these comics, so I can't really say much...
I read blood hunt and Doom academy he barely shows up, even in Doom academy all he did was shown up to save the kids from some magic book creatures becoming real, and in blood hunt all he did was manipulate strange to became sorcerer supreme.
 
Although I dislike splits, I feel like sometimes it can be a better approach than repeating the same discussions time and time again because of inconsistencies.

Marvel doesn't has a solid cosmology that is unchanging, it's always changing and being retconned, sometimes for bigger stuff, other times it becomes more limited. There are times the universe is portrayed with infinities upon infinities, and other times in which it being finite is an important plot point.

Naturally, some attempts have been made to unify some cosmologies, but even those attempts aren't absolute and they themselves can have their elements set in levels that were not indented originally.

Because saying there's no "canonical difference" isn't really right, the difference in canons is very clear. The only thing that isn't official is the names and "authors related to X cosmology", those are things that are decided by each fan, but knowing that different writers portray marvel and its characters differently is a very clear thing that has been recognized many times, going beyond even singular writers even into editorial. There were times in which Marvel has an editorial that is very certain about a certain lore that needs to be followed, and other times in which that isn't the case.

If someone attempts to make a singular "Marvel cosmology" that is impossible because of inconsistencies, then choices need to be made. Deciding what it a retcon or not, where each thing is in the cosmological hierarchy, which cosmic being is above the other, these are things that are all over the place so even deciding in one over the other is already making a personal choice.

I would say that the cosmology split is a way of at least acknowledging all these different inconsistent point of views as valid to their own, and although some elements are incorporated by others, it's not done without some level of retconning for example.

Naturally, making such choices would need a lot of research and nuanced discussion on Marvel, but I wouldn't say it's something that is absurd, just one of the many consequences of having a widely contradictory work.
Strongly agreed. 🙏
Aside, this reminds me of the guy writing Miles Morales as a shonen MC (which, to be fair, kinda works for him) where he gets a bunch of powers like lightning laser swords, dialed to 11. The issue with this is that as soon as these people leave these books editorial is going to have to deal with the problem of why these characters don’t just solve everything since they’re uber-duper-powerful, which is one of the issues Ewing tried to deal with while coming after Cates for Thor.
That was almost Ewing's official explanation, yes, but, as I have stated previously, Ewing has also overpowered plenty of other characters, including Storm, far beyond Thor's Cates level, so, given the context of the overall treatment of Thor by most Marvel writers, I think that Ewing was likely insincere in his answer, and that there is an overall prejudice against Thor because he is a cisgendered male heterosexual scandinavian former viking, which is seemingly considered automatically extremely politically incorrect by them in comparison to the characters that Ewing heavily helped to overpower.

Mind you, given the absolutely destructive mess that the cisgendered "caucasian" male heterosexual population of the United States has currently helped to unleash upon the world by electing Donald Trump as president, I can definitely understand that the progressive writers are feeling bitter about it, but I don't want them to project that bitterness into systematically undermining potentially great characters that have nothing to do with it. 🙏
 
Last edited:
Doom's points are also full of crap when you realize that he's guilty for doing the exact same things. He could peacefully share his advancements with the world but instead he limits it to Latveria and uses everything else to kill the Fantastic Four and/or take over the world. Even when he had the power to shape the multiverse to his whims he ended up making the absolute nightmare hellhole that was Battleworld instead of making an actual utopia.
Strongly agreed, and let's not forget that Doom also blew up an entire populated universe, just because he felt spiteful about that his counterpart there was a well-adjusted happy family man who had helped to turn his world into an utopia... as opposed to the absolutely nightmarishly dystopian amoral cosmic horror mess that is Marvel Comics as a whole. 🙏
 
Strongly agreed. 🙏

That was almost Ewing's official explanation, yes, but, as I have stated previously, Ewing has also overpowered plenty of other characters, including Storm, far beyond Thor's Cates level, so, given the context of the overall treatment of Thor by most Marvel writers, I think that Ewing was likely insincere in his answer, and that there is an overall prejudice against Thor because he is a cisgendered male heterosexual scandinavian former viking, which is seemingly considered automatically extremely politically incorrect by them in comparison to the characters that Ewing heavily helped to overpower.

Mind you, given the absolutely destructive mess that the cisgendered "caucasian" male heterosexual population of the United States has currently helped to unleash upon the world by electing Donald Trump as president, I can definitely understand that the progressive writers are feeling bitter about it, but I don't want them to project that bitterness into systematically undermining potentially great characters that have nothing to do with it. 🙏
dude stop brining real world politics to this thread
 
Okay. My apologies. I did not know how to explain the context for what I think is going on any other way. 🙏
 
Dominions as a concept actually pretty logical. Like there already many characters who able put universe into the box computer (like that guy who killed Amadeus Cho family and scientists from Miracleman), there also was super advanced computers who evolved to abstract level before Dominions (like stark computer from Venom:the end). And main universe is also called simulation ( in avengers A.I.). So in my opinion it logical that there exist computers able to evolve to outside multiverse.
 
@The_Impress

Your input would also be appreciated here. 🙏
...on a discussion thread?

Make a CRT and we'll see, you can't do a revision on a General Discussion thread, or verify anything, it should be demonstrated on a proper forum, otherwise we're engaging in a pointless yapfest (and if you just want community acknowledgement for some idea you're floating around, the person talking about it, do it on Discord or smth lol)
 
Dominions as a concept actually pretty logical. Like there already many characters who able put universe into the box computer (like that guy who killed Amadeus Cho family and scientists from Miracleman), there also was super advanced computers who evolved to abstract level before Dominions (like stark computer from Venom:the end). And main universe is also called simulation ( in avengers A.I.). So in my opinion it logical that there exist computers able to evolve to outside multiverse.
This, plus there is a scan indicating how Dominions are similar to gods in how belief gives them power
 
I feel like the Marvel Comics verse page should have a more detailed "Power of the Verse" section. Like list more characters who fit into each level, give more detailed explanations of why those characters are that tier, etc. It should explain the primary feat used for each tier.

I also think that it needs to do a better job at explaining where the 1-A characters are relative to each other. Like we have Thor at 1-A, and the Infinity Gauntlet, and the Living Tribunal. I understand why we currently have everyone from Skyfathers up together in 1-A (although I think there was some discussions of downgrades?) but to an outside observer, it would look like saying Thor is the same level of power as the Living Tribunal.

And there needs to be a better explained split between the 3-C and Low 1-C Heralds. They are kinda lumped in together on the powerscaling rules and both treated as Herald peaks, but that just doesn't work. We need an explanation of the difference between Low Herald vs. Mid Herald vs. High Herald. Kinda needs new names for these tiers anyway, since "Low Mid Tier" is basically nonexistent, and in most threads I've seen, 5-Bs have been refered to as "Low Herald" instead of "Upper Mid Tier."

I mentioned this earlier but I'd also like a lot of clarification on Abstract vs. Skyfather scaling. Nightmare is compared to both Mephisto and Eternity on his profile. Is he Skyfather level or Abstract level? If we are currently accepting all those characters to be roughly comparable that's cool, but that should be explained. And if not, there needs to be clarification. And as we were discussing earlier, Thor's Phoenix Flames scaling to Multiversal Abstract causes problems here too. Scarlet Witch's profile implies she scales above the Phoenix Force, but it also puts her at like 1/3 the level of presumably Universal Eternity.

And since there are so many revisions down the pipeline for basically every tier, there should also be a note that the verse is in a state of flux so that the ratings may change while we figure things out.

Since Marvel Comics is one of the most powerful and complicated verses out there, I think it requires much more explaining than we currently have.

I get that this is quite a difficult undertaking and there is a lot of work going into fixing the verse right now, so I don't want to rush. Basically I just want to bring up this issue I have with the verse and that once everything is ironed out, I want the verse page to give good explanations on every conclusion.
 
Last edited:
Dominions as a concept actually pretty logical. Like there already many characters who able put universe into the box computer (like that guy who killed Amadeus Cho family and scientists from Miracleman), there also was super advanced computers who evolved to abstract level before Dominions (like stark computer from Venom:the end). And main universe is also called simulation ( in avengers A.I.). So in my opinion it logical that there exist computers able to evolve to outside multiverse.
Yeah, it’s definitely not narrative-breaking in terms of what’s accepted in Marvel, it would just be standard-breaking in terms of what’s codified on this wiki.
I feel like the Marvel Comics verse page should have a more detailed "Power of the Verse" section. Like list more characters who fit into each level, give more detailed explanations of why those characters are that tier, etc. It should explain the primary feat used for each tier.

I also think that it needs to do a better job at explaining where the 1-A characters are relative to each other. Like we have Thor at 1-A, and the Infinity Gauntlet, and the Living Tribunal. I understand why we currently have everyone from Skyfathers up together in 1-A (although I think there was some discussions of downgrades?) but to an outside observer, it would look like saying Thor is the same level of power as the Living Tribunal.

And there needs to be a better explained split between the 3-C and Low 1-C Heralds. They are kinda lumped in together on the powerscaling rules and both treated as Herald peaks, but that just doesn't work. We need an explanation of the difference between Low Herald vs. Mid Herald vs. High Herald. Kinda needs new names for these tiers anyway, since "Low Mid Tier" is basically nonexistent, and in most threads I've seen, 5-Bs have been refered to as "Low Herald" instead of "Upper Mid Tier."

I mentioned this earlier but I'd also like a lot of clarification on Abstract vs. Skyfather scaling. Nightmare is compared to both Mephisto and Eternity on his profile. Is he Skyfather level or Abstract level? If we are currently accepting all those characters to be roughly comparable that's cool, but that should be explained. And if not, there needs to be clarification. And as we were discussing earlier, Thor's Phoenix Flames scaling to Multiversal Abstract causes problems here too. Scarlet Witch's profile implies she scales above the Phoenix Force, but it also puts her at like 1/3 the level of presumably Universal Eternity.

And since there are so many revisions down the pipeline for basically every tier, there should also be a note that the verse is in a state of flux so that the ratings may change while we figure things out.

Since Marvel Comics is one of the most powerful and complicated verses out there, I think it requires much more explaining than we currently have.

I get that this is quite a difficult undertaking and there is a lot of work going into fixing the verse right now, so I don't want to rush. Basically I just want to bring up this issue I have with the verse and that once everything is ironed out, I want the verse page to give good explanations on every conclusion.
The 5-B tiers are broken as well (as Impress has noted and is trying to solve), and there definitely is a broken chain from 3-C to L1-C as seen in Black Bolt’s 3-C justification including him harming Thanos with his voice even though Thanos in base is just rated as L1-C. And that’s after a good 30 seconds of searching through the 3-C tiers, btw.
 
Back
Top