- 470
- 307
Sonic as well as the other god-tiers of the Sonic game continuity are currently rated as having 6D AP due to scaling to a cosmology with one extra spatial dimension on top of the already existing 3+1 dimensions, as well as an additional extra dimension via a "hypertimeline" that encompasses the Sonic multiverse. In this thread, I will demonstrate that the given justification for asserting the existence of such a "hypertimeline" in the Sonic verse is invalid and flagrantly misinterprets any reasonable set of standards for what constitutes a "hypertimeline." Thus, I propose that this line of scaling be nuked from the Sonic verse entirely.
Now let's make a checklist of how to prove that a hypertimeline exists via a concise checklist as well as discuss examples of what does not count as sufficient proof of the existence of a hypertimeline:
Checklist
Now, I will point out that the blog cites the fact that Sonic says "Time travel!" at the end of the game when reflecting on the fact that even after all the stuff he did over the course of Generations, his chili dog was still warm. But does that mean that time travel was the method used to go from one hypersnapshot to another? No, that's a huge stretch and there's no reason to interpret it that way. All this means is that all the weird things Sonic did running through time made it so that he looped back to the same moment in time (not an entire hypersnapshot, but a normal snapshot, as the timelines were still damaged as I pointed out above) even though it felt like a long time from his perspective. The fact that the timeline is still damaged directly contradicts the idea that Sonic just used hypertime travel to get back to the same hypersnapshot to eat his chili dog while it was still warm because it actually wasn't the same hypersnapshot.
Since there is no proof that any sort of hypertime travel occurred, there is no proof of a hypertimeline either in this case.
Since there is no proof that any sort of hypertime travel occurred, there is no proof of a hypertimeline either in this case.
On top of that, the fact that only echoes are left of Mephiles's timeline being erased contradicts the claim of a hypertimeline, because if there was a hypertimeline, the erasure of Mephiles's timeline would be nothing more than a movement from one snapshot to another. Mephiles's timeline would still exist in its entirety as a past snapshot. The fact that only echoes are left of Mephiles's timeline contradicts this. This is further supported by the fact that Gerald confirms that if Shadow were to change his past, it would also rewrite his future and that all the things he did in the timeline originally would cease to be, which is absolutely not how a hypertimeline works.
Also, it's outright confirmed both here and here that there is just a singular dimension of time, that time is only one dimension.
Disagree: Maverick_Zero_X, Theglassman12, DarkDragonMedeus
Neutral:
Introduction and Standards
First off, let's (quickly) discuss what a hypertimeline is and how the blog attempts to prove it. A hypertimeline operates along an extra dimension of time and is a collection of multiple "snapshots" of entire timelines or even sets of timelines (let's call these "hypersnapshots") with all of these hypersnapshots coexisting in the hypertimeline. Additionally, these hypersnapshots are connected in a continuous, "time-like" manner; as a result, there are an uncountably infinite amount of these hypersnapshots contained by the hypertimeline. The existence of such a hypertimeline can be proven by citing a case where someone in the verse uses some sort of "time travel" to travel from one "hypersnapshot" to an entirely different hypersnapshot (We can call this "hypertime travel") (time travel is assumed to be movement along a "time-like" series of snapshots, which I accept and will not contend).Now let's make a checklist of how to prove that a hypertimeline exists via a concise checklist as well as discuss examples of what does not count as sufficient proof of the existence of a hypertimeline:
Checklist
- Cite an instance where someone travels from one hypersnapshot to another
- Method must specifically be time travel ("Hypertime travel")
- Snapshots do not encompass an entire timeline, but are simply subsets of a timeline (they're not "hyper")
- Method of going from one hypersnapshot to another not being time travel
Evaluating the Supposed Evidence
1. Sonic x Shadow Generations
Now, the blog attempts to prove the existence of a hypertimeline by pointing to three cases where time travel is allegedly used to travel from one hypersnapshot to another. However, none of these examples hold up. The first given example is that of the two Sonics restoring the multiverse in Sonic Generations. However, time travel is never said or indicated to be the method Sonic uses to restore his multiverse. The game explains that the two Sonics are restoring spacetime by using their speed to restore the dimensional energy that was drained by the Time Eater. While they do run back in time, that's not them using time travel to go to an entirely different "hypersnapshot" where the timelines weren't destroyed yet, not even close. The fact that they're piecing reality together bit by bit (as opposed to as a whole all at once) with nothing being reversed outside of those comparably tiny bits also contradicts the idea that they're using some sort of hyper time travel to get to an entirely different hypersnapshot where the multiverses are still intact. The idea that the Sonics used "hypertime travel" falls even further apart under this very simple question: If they really were using hyper time travel, why didn't they just rewind to a hypersnapshot before Time Eater absorbed all of the dimensional energy? And even if they had some convoluted reason not to do so, then why didn't they use this hypertime travel at the end of the game? The timelines were still broken when the classic and modern characters were partying together, so they had not in fact traveled to a previously existing "hypersnapshot" where the timelines were fixed. It makes no sense.Now, I will point out that the blog cites the fact that Sonic says "Time travel!" at the end of the game when reflecting on the fact that even after all the stuff he did over the course of Generations, his chili dog was still warm. But does that mean that time travel was the method used to go from one hypersnapshot to another? No, that's a huge stretch and there's no reason to interpret it that way. All this means is that all the weird things Sonic did running through time made it so that he looped back to the same moment in time (not an entire hypersnapshot, but a normal snapshot, as the timelines were still damaged as I pointed out above) even though it felt like a long time from his perspective. The fact that the timeline is still damaged directly contradicts the idea that Sonic just used hypertime travel to get back to the same hypersnapshot to eat his chili dog while it was still warm because it actually wasn't the same hypersnapshot.
Since there is no proof that any sort of hypertime travel occurred, there is no proof of a hypertimeline either in this case.
2. Sonic '06
This one's simpler to explain. The blog says that since the story, which involved the repairing of damaged timelines, was referred to as a time travel story, it must have been time travel that caused the repair of the damaged timelines. But that interpretation doesn't really make any sense. Time travel occurs multiple times throughout the game without repairing the timelines Ex: Eggman sending Sonic to the future, Silver traveling back to the present, and Shadow traveling to the past. When time travel happens, it doesn't repairs the timelines. On the contrary, it's them blowing out Solaris's flame that restores the timeline. Even right before they blew out Solaris's flame in the past, the timelines were still damaged. There was no point in the story where they just used "hyper time travel" to go back to a hypersnapshot in hypertime where the timelines were still intact. And as an aside, the hypertimeline interpretation of Sonic '06 really does pose the same problem as in Generations where if hypertime travel really was a thing, they could just reverse any and all bad things that happen during the story.Since there is no proof that any sort of hypertime travel occurred, there is no proof of a hypertimeline either in this case.
3. Sonic Prime
This one's the easiest to cover. In Sonic Prime, Sonic uses the Paradox Prism to restore his universe before its spacetime was messed up. But this simply isn't time travel, it's just using magic to restore a multiverse. That's obviously not proof of a hypertimeline.The underlying issue with all of these arguments
Underlying all of the bad arguments that the blog makes is the assumption that a change to timelines in the verse must have been done through time travel, even if no causal link was established. It's a false cause fallacy. In cases where Sonic mentions time travel to explain why his chili dog is still warm, where time travel is mentioned as an important part of the story, and even in cases where the blog can't even cite any mentions of time travel, the blog assumes without good reason that time travel must have also been the mechanism by which timelines were restored in these stories.Last words
None of these three instances serve as evidence for a hypertimeline in the Sonic verse. As such, this 6D scaling for game Sonic needs to be nuked.Edit: Other information I found
Mephiles wasn't brought back by the Time Eater through time travel, he was more likely a residual echo of his erased timeline. It definitely makes more sense than TIme Eater just deciding to bring back an erased timeline for no reason. (The "past" being mentioned isn't proof of hypertime btw as multiple factors such as Sonic, Shadow, and even time healing itself were restoring parts of time, allowing for the "past" to exist).On top of that, the fact that only echoes are left of Mephiles's timeline being erased contradicts the claim of a hypertimeline, because if there was a hypertimeline, the erasure of Mephiles's timeline would be nothing more than a movement from one snapshot to another. Mephiles's timeline would still exist in its entirety as a past snapshot. The fact that only echoes are left of Mephiles's timeline contradicts this. This is further supported by the fact that Gerald confirms that if Shadow were to change his past, it would also rewrite his future and that all the things he did in the timeline originally would cease to be, which is absolutely not how a hypertimeline works.
Also, it's outright confirmed both here and here that there is just a singular dimension of time, that time is only one dimension.
Staff evaluation:
Agree: Qawsedf234Disagree: Maverick_Zero_X, Theglassman12, DarkDragonMedeus
Neutral:
Last edited: