- 12,035
- 15,559
I don't know what I was smoking in that calculation. Including everything Guacamolefletcher said, although he is kind of wrong if the object of reference is in front of what you're pixel scaling. While the results would be inaccurate, it's a low ball, which we accept over inflating results. That's not the case here, but I felt like nitpicking.
But the calc is also trying to px scale the cloud's thickness, which is impossible given the angle we have.