Sans vs Uzi Doorman

[VIZION99]

I dont think you have brought up a new agurment in pages you just keep saying the same thing over and over. I doubt they have been convinced by the same aguremnt you have been trying since like page 1.

But don't you agree with me? Uzi's immorality and regeneration would allow her to survive slightly longer to Sans's attacks, giving her enough time to one shot him with her abilities.

 

[Ebihara]

But don't you agree with me? Uzi's immorality and regeneration would allow her to survive slightly longer to Sans's attacks, giving her enough time to one shot him with her abilities.

no I dont agree with you. people can disagree otherwise every matchup would be X-0. I think you are a little aggressive trying to get votes for your side, asking people if things are a vote when they just aren't or anything close to it, unless someone clearly states it "NAME fra" or "Ill vote NAME for X reason." As well as @ people to see if they changed there vote when they clearly also disagree/aren't convinced. Some people will get sensitive about that and might end up in RVRT wrongfully for attempting to manipulate votes.

 

[Comiphorous]

@Comiphorous Do you still think Sans would win?

I'm gonna be honest, I myself had a better run convincing me Uzi won than anyone did in this thread besides maybe FinePoint in it's whole 6 pages.

 

[VIZION99]

I'm gonna be honest, I myself had a better run convincing me Uzi won than anyone did in this thread besides maybe FinePoint in it's whole 6 pages.

Wait, you are telling me you are changing your vote to Uzi?

 

[Comiphorous]

Wait, you are telling me you are changing your vote to Uzi?

Absolutely ******* not LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[Ebihara]

See, exactly this. If people are going to vote they will be EXPLICT about it.

 

[Comiphorous]

See, exactly this. If people are going to vote they will be EXPLICT about it.

No in all fairness sometimes im just a ******** and not be super explicit about it. valid question.

 

[Ebihara]

Ok, should be explict they are voting is better way to put it.

 

[VIZION99]

So its a grace for Sans now

 

[VIZION99]

no I dont agree with you. people can disagree otherwise every matchup would be X-0. I think you are a little aggressive trying to get votes for your side, asking people if things are a vote when they just aren't or anything close to it, unless someone clearly states it "NAME fra" or "Ill vote NAME for X reason." As well as @ people to see if they changed there vote when they clearly also disagree/aren't convinced. Some people will get sensitive about that and might end up in RVRT wrongfully for attempting to manipulate votes.

I am new to making versus threads, sorry if I sound aggressive. I didn't mean to it. When someone disagrees with me, I want to know a reason why. So far, you haven't explain to me how would Sans supposed to kill Uzi first when I pointed out that Uzi has immorality and regeneration along the fact her abilities are one shots while Sans's attacks are just durability negation and poison damage.

 

[VIZION99]

Ok, should be explict they are voting is better way to put it.

You are right about that, I forget about it sometimes. Next time, I will always make sure I do that. Thank you for telling me that.

 

[Comiphorous]

You are right about that, I forget about it sometimes. Next time, I will always make sure I do that. Thank you for telling me that.

no that was 100% directed toward me apparently people want me to be "clear who i'm voting for." as if i'd ever...

 

[Ebihara]

no that was 100% directed toward me apparently people want me to be "clear who i'm voting for." as if i'd ever...

no it was in general. PSA

 

[Comiphorous]

no it was in general. PSA

too late my ego has interpreted your words to always be talking about me!!!!!!!!!! foiled again, worm!!!!!!