• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

DmC: Devil May Cry Downgrade (Part 2) - Sub-Rel Donte is Bogus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
5,428
Reaction score
4,859
Part 1. No complicated intro this time guys.

Currently, the DMC Reboot Cast get their Sub-Reltavistic Rating from this singular calc, and it has two massive issues.

1) It hasn't been evaluated. Other than @Golden_Void saying, "I assume the first value was used on the profile?" there is no further comments by any other CGM Members, current or prior. @Dalesean027 Evaled it. The Mach 344 End was accepted.
2) The Sub-Reltavistic Part of this calc is clearly Calc-Stacking. Its taking a timeframe derived from a different part of the fight and applying it to a seperate feat. This is like saying that if Character A moved 2 meters to block lightning, and later on in the fight they move a 100 Meters, you can use the timeframe dervived from the 2 Meter Feat.

Given this, I believe that the verse be debunked to Mach 344 or Massively Hypersonic, unless there any other problems with the calc.
 
Last edited:
If the calc wasn't approved then neither end should be used, and they should be scaled for different reasons entirely.

What's the next most impressive feat other than this one?
 
If the calc wasn't approved then neither end should be used, and they should be scaled for different reasons entirely.

What's the next most impressive feat other than this one?
I'll dig and see what I can find, but maybe Dante dodging lasers?
 
I mean, this one just seems simple I guess, do wonder who (if anybody) is going to make a thread to talk about any possible abilities Vergil gained in his DLC
 
I mean, this one just seems simple I guess, do wonder who (if anybody) is going to make a thread to talk about any possible abilities Vergil gained in his DLC
I'll see what I can do, but the P&A will probably go Dante -> Vergil -> Mundus
 
Most of his P&A have no referenecs+He is the MC.
TBH I think you can just tackle everyone in one CRT if that's the case. If its the same to Mundus, making a CRT to apply References for each one separately feels like it'll take too much time
 
Alright, its been 48 hrs, and I have applied the changes. Thread can be closed.
 
Alright, its been 48 hrs, and I have applied the changes. Thread can be closed.
I will close this then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top